You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just tried running inference in batch mode using the two images in the test data using the BACH model.
What happens is that a progress bar shows. All good. However, the progressbar seems to work a little differently than assumed.
What happens is that it iterates up to 50%, patch-by-patch, before it goes to the next image, and continues to 100%.
At least the user has verbose for both images, but there is no information on how many images it has iterated through, unless you do the math yourself.
I would think two progressbars here make more sense and is more user friendly:
showing which image it is currently processing
for the current image, how far has the patch processing come
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just tried running inference in batch mode using the two images in the test data using the BACH model.
What happens is that a progress bar shows. All good. However, the progressbar seems to work a little differently than assumed.
What happens is that it iterates up to 50%, patch-by-patch, before it goes to the next image, and continues to 100%.
At least the user has verbose for both images, but there is no information on how many images it has iterated through, unless you do the math yourself.
I would think two progressbars here make more sense and is more user friendly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: