You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Situation: I run assnake result dada2-filter-and-trim --preset def -d $DNAME gather -j 50 --run
It returned the result I was not pleased with. I changed a preset and run again. Then, I realised, that assnake used not the original raw data, but a preprocessed one by the first run.
To my mind, it is not very obvious behaviour. But I am interested is there an option to use the original raw dataset (or maybe an option to outline a name of preprocessed version of dataset (a folder name), for example : raw, or raw__dada2fat_def.fbe5687 or raw__dada2fat_def.fbe5687__dada2fat_manual
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, I found some logic inconsistency:
before I run assnake result dada2-filter-and-trim, I run assnake result dada2-full. It failed, then I used dada2-filter-and-trim. After that, I run again assnake result dada2-full considering that like at the situation descibed in my previous comment this script will use the newest (filtered and trimmed) dataset. But it wasn't.
Situation: I run
assnake result dada2-filter-and-trim --preset def -d $DNAME gather -j 50 --run
It returned the result I was not pleased with. I changed a preset and run again. Then, I realised, that assnake used not the original raw data, but a preprocessed one by the first run.
To my mind, it is not very obvious behaviour. But I am interested is there an option to use the original raw dataset (or maybe an option to outline a name of preprocessed version of dataset (a folder name), for example :
raw
, orraw__dada2fat_def.fbe5687
orraw__dada2fat_def.fbe5687__dada2fat_manual
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: