You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Identify subcommittee: at least one plug-in vendor, and at least one host
Discuss the idea in this issue
Write new or updated code and doc
Publish updates as a pull request (ideally on a feature/PROPOSAL-NAME branch)
Make sure that PR references this issue number to keep them in sync
Discuss and review code in the PR
Meet all requirements below for accepting PR
When subcommittee signs off and other members don't have any further review comments,
maintainer merges PR to master which closes PR and issue
Requirements for accepting a standard change:
Header files updated
Documentation updated
Release notes added
Compatibility review completed
Working code demonstrated with at least one host and one plugin
At least two members sign off
No further changes requested from membership
Summary
The latest version as of today is 1.4 ( released in 2015, 7 years ago ). May be its time to release and bump up the version number.
Motivation
There's a fork of the library by Natron project ( https://github.com/NatronGitHub/openfx ) which is 1201 commits ahead of this original branch ( Not sure if those commits are specific to Natron ). Looking at the commits & discussion in the issues, there clearly is a lot of work done & going on. It would be a good idea to consolidate those changes and release a new version.
Problem
In absence of continuous releases, the clients aren't able to make use of the hard-work added by the contributors. Also, the project appears dormant, and clients keep facing the issues with little to no help.
Impact
Is this a new feature (no compatibility impact), a change to an existing function suite (version
the suite to avoid compatibility issues), a change to an existing property, or a documentation
change?
How will hosts and plugins negotiate use of this change? Show how it works when a host implements
it but not plugin and vice versa.
Documentation Impact
What changes to the docs are needed for this change?
Stakeholders
Who will benefit from this proposed change? Plug-ins, hosts, or both? Specific types of hosts?
Discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Especially now that OpenFX is joining the Academy Software Foundation, we are very interested in looking at the Natron changes. Would someone like to attend the next OpenFX TSC meeting to present the changes and discuss how to integrate them, where it makes sense?
Open Effects Proposal for Standard Change
Please read the contribution guidelines first.
Standard Change Workflow
standard change
tagfeature/PROPOSAL-NAME
branch)maintainer merges PR to master which closes PR and issue
Requirements for accepting a standard change:
Summary
The latest version as of today is 1.4 ( released in 2015, 7 years ago ). May be its time to release and bump up the version number.
Motivation
There's a fork of the library by Natron project ( https://github.com/NatronGitHub/openfx ) which is 1201 commits ahead of this original branch ( Not sure if those commits are specific to Natron ). Looking at the commits & discussion in the issues, there clearly is a lot of work done & going on. It would be a good idea to consolidate those changes and release a new version.
Problem
In absence of continuous releases, the clients aren't able to make use of the hard-work added by the contributors. Also, the project appears dormant, and clients keep facing the issues with little to no help.
Impact
Is this a new feature (no compatibility impact), a change to an existing function suite (version
the suite to avoid compatibility issues), a change to an existing property, or a documentation
change?
How will hosts and plugins negotiate use of this change? Show how it works when a host implements
it but not plugin and vice versa.
Documentation Impact
What changes to the docs are needed for this change?
Stakeholders
Who will benefit from this proposed change? Plug-ins, hosts, or both? Specific types of hosts?
Discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: