We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instead of,
export const concat = makeOperator1ToN<OperatorType.CONCAT, string, string>( OperatorType.CONCAT, tm.string(), TypeHint.STRING );
Use this,
export const concat : Operator1ToN<string, string> = makeOperator1ToN<OperatorType.CONCAT, string, string>( OperatorType.CONCAT, tm.string(), TypeHint.STRING );
We cannot rely on type inference. We need to explicitly add type annotations or AMD declaration emit will break.
Keep an eye on this, microsoft/TypeScript#37267
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to #283
d71a858
Merge pull request #284 from AnyhowStep/explicit-type-annotations-for…
e7602d8
…-operators Related to #283
AnyhowStep
No branches or pull requests
Instead of,
Use this,
We cannot rely on type inference. We need to explicitly add type annotations or AMD declaration emit will break.
Keep an eye on this,
microsoft/TypeScript#37267
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: