Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statement of values #3

Open
nottrobin opened this issue Apr 11, 2013 · 10 comments
Open

Statement of values #3

nottrobin opened this issue Apr 11, 2013 · 10 comments

Comments

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor

This statement would presumably impact on which charities could be donated to through our service.

This is related to #2 because under oatman's model the political directions would be decided by the trustees. If we were to go with a more democratic model we would need a statement to keep the whole community on track.

The theory here is that online community values can perpetuate even with complete democracy - only people with similar values will be attracted, and the community develops an identity around the values.

For that theory to work we need a statement of what these values are. This should presumably be as vague as possible (to allow for evolution) while satisfying everyone's most important principles.

Some suggestions:

  • openness & transparency
  • secularity & humanism
  • egalitatianism
  • democracy
  • human rights
@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think human rights is an interesting one, because different people have different ideas of what constitutes human rights - for example "western" cultures tend to associate freedoms, especially freedom of expression, with human rights more than "eastern" cultures.

If we have something around human rights it should be more clearly defined.

@0atman
Copy link
Member

0atman commented Apr 11, 2013

I propose we take inspiration from http://conscientiousmechanist.com/

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Some discussion on this topic has taken place in ticket #2. I've closed that issue - discussion on values should now happen here. I'm now going to try to duplicate relevant points here.

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

oatman mentioned this as a place to draw inspiration from:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ivlfp9zzq9pevoa/ConscientiousMechanist.pdf

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reposting another oatman comment:

Just a note from chat:

11:13:44      @nottrobin | personally my principles are focused on global equality, global thinking            │
                         | (anti-nationalist), sustainability (zero-growth), utilitarian state, reabilitation  │
                         | over punishment                                                                     │
11:13:53      @nottrobin | just thought I'd get that down                                                      │
11:14:53      @nottrobin | I suppose there might be room for nonviolence, anti-poverty, environmental          │
                         | responsibility and secularity of state in there too                                 │
11:16:24         @oatman | agreed                                                                              │

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's a document for drafting ideas for the charter:
https://docs.google.com/a/robinwinslow.co.uk/document/d/1A3FUu3dXUbkCi89Y4adQbPyBvQyD6LheGanifIFHtxA

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Chaps does anyone object to me publicly linking to the document? Say in a blog post?

@deadlight
Copy link
Member

It's a little too early for me to feel comfortable just yet

On 16 April 2013 16:42, Robin Winslow [email protected] wrote:

Chaps does anyone object to me publicly linking to the document? Say in a
blog post?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3#issuecomment-16452289
.

Karl Williams
+44(0)7903 226710
deadlight.net
@karlwilliams

@0atman
Copy link
Member

0atman commented Apr 16, 2013

It'll be publicly linkable when we have our draft in the repository.

Tris

On 16 April 2013 16:44, Karl Williams [email protected] wrote:

It's a little too early for me to feel comfortable just yet

On 16 April 2013 16:42, Robin Winslow [email protected] wrote:

Chaps does anyone object to me publicly linking to the document? Say in
a
blog post?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/blackgate-foundation/charter/issues/3#issuecomment-16452289>

.

Karl Williams
+44(0)7903 226710
deadlight.net
@karlwilliams


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3#issuecomment-16452427
.

@nottrobin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coolbeans. I'll wait until then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@0atman @deadlight @nottrobin and others