You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I rechecked the MARKUP list to see what had been discussed as to which the Unicode character to use for the interpunct.https://lsv.uky.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1910&L=MARKUP&P=R22907 I had selected the more correct U+2E31 WORD SEPARATOR MIDDLE DOT and we were encoding the glyph as <g type="interpunct">x</g> where "x" stands for the U+2E31 code point. Given that it doesn't seem to exist in any font, I think it may be better to change the U+2E31 to the MIDDLE DOT U+00B7 · or even GREEK ANO TELEIA U+0387 · because ultimately, the type="interpunct" attribute is what identifies the character. So we can use any typography that works.
There are not many inscriptions with interpuncts.
Make sure the update the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Elli,
Thanks so much for your work with this and the images! I’m thinking Middle dot makes more sense and I will update the documentation accordingly. Chat with you and Michael this afternoon!
Regards,
Chris
From: Elli Mylonas<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: December 16, 2020 8:22 PM
To: Brown-University-Library/iip-texts<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Subscribed<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Brown-University-Library/iip-texts] interpuncts not displaying properly (#152)
EXTERNAL EMAIL:
I rechecked the MARKUP list to see what had been discussed as to which the Unicode character to use for the interpunct.https://lsv.uky.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1910&L=MARKUP&P=R22907 I had selected the more correct U+2E31 WORD SEPARATOR MIDDLE DOT and we were encoding the glyph as <g type="interpunct">x</g> where "x" stands for the U+2E31 code point. Given that it doesn't seem to exist in any font, I think it may be better to change the U+2E31 to the MIDDLE DOT U+00B7 · or even GREEK ANO TELEIA U+0387 · because ultimately, the type="interpunct" attribute is what identifies the character. So we can use any typography that works.
There are not many inscriptions with interpuncts.
Make sure the update the documentation.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#152>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AROODOMLPLIXHV52FASDNJTSVFMLVANCNFSM4U62SCOA>.
I rechecked the MARKUP list to see what had been discussed as to which the Unicode character to use for the interpunct.https://lsv.uky.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1910&L=MARKUP&P=R22907 I had selected the more correct U+2E31 WORD SEPARATOR MIDDLE DOT and we were encoding the glyph as
<g type="interpunct">x</g>
where "x" stands for the U+2E31 code point. Given that it doesn't seem to exist in any font, I think it may be better to change the U+2E31 to the MIDDLE DOT U+00B7·
or even GREEK ANO TELEIA U+0387·
because ultimately, thetype="interpunct"
attribute is what identifies the character. So we can use any typography that works.There are not many inscriptions with interpuncts.
Make sure the update the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: