Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inaccurate evidence codes? #431

Open
kcs3 opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

inaccurate evidence codes? #431

kcs3 opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@kcs3
Copy link
Collaborator

kcs3 commented Oct 9, 2019

In https://ctd2-dashboard.nci.nih.gov/dashboard/#observation/20190212-columbia-paracne-1-colony-0, I note a few possible problems the automatically assigned evidence codes (found with the question mark icons in the evidence type column:

In the 5th and 6th rows, which link out to submitter-assigned ECO codes, the automatically assigned code for evidence type "Link" is http://www.evidenceontology.org/term/ECO:0000212/, "combinatorial evidence". The term description is "A type of evidence in which at least two distinct types of evidence have been integrated.". This does not seem right for a generic link.

However, in looking through the ECO ontology terms, I do not find anything appropriate...

@kcs3 kcs3 self-assigned this Oct 9, 2019
@kcs3 kcs3 changed the title incorrect evidence codes? inaccurate evidence codes? Oct 9, 2019
@kcs3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcs3 commented Oct 17, 2019

suggest wild cards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant