-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing key algorithms by configuration Multiple public keys. #1654
Comments
Could you please include your |
Sure. Currently, the public and private keys have not been deployed yet. I can send it to you for a look. <asymmetric-key>
<name>secp384</name>
<algorithm>secp384r1</algorithm>
<public-key>MHYwEAYHKoZIzj0CAQYFK4EEACIDYgAE+H0OgQVKQ/stq0qUem7m6Enb2BEWZ8XJiXLUk7rmQuVAAAOX4+g46jpBV0hCtgtj4HXUJmQnTx/GKC35rfj4Ol2FKaZnkyY8mwK9UVeV6ZJQYK19McHhFcXja/bIgUrD</public-key>
<private-key>MIGkAgEBBDAHBUQ1Tz+OuAMAGpaGsm7hYRyz26zgB2dkrmeeAr93RKLXJxsArkciNYKOVB74Nt+gBwYFK4EEACKhZANiAAR1ZQGs0zdFVNlCfEXdeiHDTphlOn2B/R3nbX+M0X/LYGi4E8zSGZcjgYmPivrZkv1wz958NTP9pUecJFxGE3xdLr6Ho0MjE7Gt4pmV6LvK7lYY/1CDMZV+xtzBwwhqjiE=</private-key>
</asymmetric-key>
<asymmetric-key>
<name>secp256</name>
<algorithm>secp256r1</algorithm>
<public-key>MFkwEwYHKoZIzj0CAQYIKoZIzj0DAQcDQgAEUNnV0WexOQfkg45Cnn/PNhNqI2DGGjEtBUmc+lUd1rbMc3VLn/wPvsCvabrOXQ4daFFL+gep/AhHZHvF1Mi3kw==</public-key>
<private-key>MHcCAQEEIANphBqVgGmqoNHZq7Rmpqa1ddAPNVCJmBgfK6mr7tkeoAoGCCqGSM49AwEHoUQDQgAEUNnV0WexOQfkg45Cnn/PNhNqI2DGGjEtBUmc+lUd1rbMc3VLn/wPvsCvabrOXQ4daFFL+gep/AhHZHvF1Mi3kw==</private-key>
</asymmetric-key>
<asymmetric-key>
<name>secp521</name>
<algorithm>secp521r1</algorithm>
<public-key>MIGbMBAGByqGSM49AgEGBSuBBAAjA4GGAAQA0jmyxfD+YMC+Tazec4oIfUjI/nci4Xwqa5SboqRJPwGfzMZviqFRGMhu+UrcqONuXSc0wXOYPW5NQpNfKH5t6OQBA64ehR6M56PIhiSrOQ5xZ3PE8ktmZlMu+XYGQe3U2zFXSXLv2ZGn1GgDtJMouH2TMQV9TM63tLPQOtzrJN3iFVQ=</public-key>
<private-key>MIHcAgEBBEIAdPQe0C6H895JvKL1Z1DET9sKlgiYptE0pJ5y57kYWqMhZ+qsHpKA0I7MP/5I8t9WF1JTsMH5AgBSJSBgex6lIKSgBwYFK4EEACOhgYkDgYYABADSObLF8P5gwL5NrN5zigh9SMj+dyLhfCprlJuipEk/AZ/Mxm+KoVEYyG75Styo425dJzTBc5g9bk1Ck18ofm3o5AEDrh6FHozno8iGJKs5DnFnc8TyS2ZmUy75dgZB7dTbMVdJcu/ZkafUaAO0kyi4fZMxBX1Mzre0s9A63Osk3eIVVA==</private-key>
</asymmetric-key>
<asymmetric-key>
<name>x25519</name>
<algorithm>x25519</algorithm>
<public-key>MCowBQYDK2VuAyEAv3emx3R4Bp/Ob8E2YIFs6lGye2KzejbXu/HMlqT19Qs=</public-key>
<private-key>MC4CAQAwBQYDK2VuBCIEIJgE+P5q9sAhyd7AbUlhOB8m2NM9kw9PTkwrg1aZPiRC</private-key>
</asymmetric-key> |
So what libnetconf2/netopeer2 version are you using? It really seems like an old one so I may not be able to provide any support. |
Netopeer2 V2.1.62 libnetconf V2.1.34 |
It it now more than a year old, in our development schedule that is quite a lot, the used YANG modules were updated and the whole configuration works differently. So I cannot provide proper support and I do not understand why |
As shown in the figure, I have configured multiple encryption methods in netconf. However, when I verify it, I find that only two of them are supported.
There is another problem. When I try to add the public key and private key of X25519, the server will report an error. Is it a problem with the format I added?
Could you please help me check if this is a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: