Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Long term VSS source format #9

Open
erikbosch opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Long term VSS source format #9

erikbosch opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@erikbosch
Copy link
Collaborator

Today we use "vspec" - Yaml with some extra semantics for include. This is sometimes criticized as we have no "formal" schema/ruleset to describe "correct" VSS. Some have proposed that a schema shall be created for JSON, but that then require that we first convert/expand to JSON.

But now we have ontologies getting more interest. Is vspec a viable long term format, or would something else be better. Possibly based on some ontology format (RDF? Owl?). Something that still "easily" can be converted to existing JSON/Yaml so that whoever wants to work with current tooling can reuse it. Like RDF->Yaml->Protobuf? Might allow a more expressive model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant