You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Today we use "vspec" - Yaml with some extra semantics for include. This is sometimes criticized as we have no "formal" schema/ruleset to describe "correct" VSS. Some have proposed that a schema shall be created for JSON, but that then require that we first convert/expand to JSON.
But now we have ontologies getting more interest. Is vspec a viable long term format, or would something else be better. Possibly based on some ontology format (RDF? Owl?). Something that still "easily" can be converted to existing JSON/Yaml so that whoever wants to work with current tooling can reuse it. Like RDF->Yaml->Protobuf? Might allow a more expressive model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Today we use "vspec" - Yaml with some extra semantics for include. This is sometimes criticized as we have no "formal" schema/ruleset to describe "correct" VSS. Some have proposed that a schema shall be created for JSON, but that then require that we first convert/expand to JSON.
But now we have ontologies getting more interest. Is vspec a viable long term format, or would something else be better. Possibly based on some ontology format (RDF? Owl?). Something that still "easily" can be converted to existing JSON/Yaml so that whoever wants to work with current tooling can reuse it. Like
RDF->Yaml->Protobuf
? Might allow a more expressive model.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: