Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

5.1.0 format has inconsistent timestamp, wrong description, and lacks string format #314

Open
ostefano opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ostefano
Copy link

ostefano commented May 22, 2024

In the just released 5.1 schema, field timestamp is type string with an unspecified format (while 5.0 had format date-time). Is there a reason for this?

Also, timestamp description is actually wrong:

Date/time format based on RFC3339 and ISO ISO8601, with an optional timezone in the format 'yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ss[+-]ZH:ZM'

While the regex (and actual timestamp values, see here for example https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/09b7c787c45c0193ce24c1fdcb98930c562741ef/cves/2024/31xxx/CVE-2024-31340.json) matches another format: yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ss with optional Z or Z[+-]HH:mm (regex (Z|[+-][0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2})?).

@ostefano ostefano changed the title 5.1 format has inconsistent timestamp, wrong description, and lacks string format 5.1.0 format has inconsistent timestamp, wrong description, and lacks string format May 22, 2024
@jayjacobs jayjacobs added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants