MethodError: no method matching Circuitscape.RasterData(::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Int64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Tuple{Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Nothing, ::Circuitscape.RasterMeta)

[luroy]

Dear all,

I’ve just started using Circuitscape on Julia with to connect only some focal node pairs (for which the Euclidean distance is less than a given threshold theshold). So I apologize in advance if my following comment is due to my unfamiliarity with Circuitscape include/exclude' option.

From a given input, I ran Circuiscape in all-to-one mode with a file indicating focal node pairs to include following the example file "listofpairstoinclude.txt" in the examples directory. I got the following error when running ini file:

• in R using “JuliaCall” package:

Erreur : Error happens in Julia.
MethodError: no method matching Circuitscape.RasterData(::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Int64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Tuple{Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Nothing, ::Circuitscape.RasterMeta)
Closest candidates are:
Circuitscape.RasterData(::Matrix{T}, ::Matrix{V}, ::Matrix{T}, ::Matrix{T}, ::Tuple{Vector{V}, Vector{V}, Vector{V}}, ::Matrix{T}, !Matched::Circuitscape.IncludeExcludePairs{V}, ::Circuitscape.RasterMeta) where {T, V} at C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\io.jl:35
Stacktrace:
[1] load_raster_data(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\io.jl:443
[2] raster_one_to_all(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\raster\onetoall.jl:4
[3] _compute(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape .\operators.j

• in Julia 1.6.1 console:

[ Info: 2021-07-29 15:33:18 : Logs will recorded to file: log_file
[ Info: 2021-07-29 15:33:19 : Precision used: Double
[ Info: 2021-07-29 15:33:24 : Reading maps
[ Info: 2021-07-29 15:33:33 : Resistance/Conductance map has 7318334 nodes
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching Circuitscape.RasterData(::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Int64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Tuple{Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}}, ::Matrix{Float64}, ::Nothing, ::Circuitscape.RasterMeta)
Closest candidates are:
Circuitscape.RasterData(::Matrix{T}, ::Matrix{V}, ::Matrix{T}, ::Matrix{T}, ::Tuple{Vector{V}, Vector{V}, Vector{V}}, ::Matrix{T}, ::Circuitscape.IncludeExcludePairs{V}, ::Circuitscape.RasterMeta) where {T, V} at C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\io.jl:35
Stacktrace:
[1] load_raster_data(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\io.jl:443
[2] raster_one_to_all(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\raster\onetoall.jl:4
[3] _compute(T::Type, V::Type, cfg::Dict{String, String})
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\run.jl:0
[4] macro expansion
@ .\timing.jl:287 [inlined]
[5] compute(path::String)
@ Circuitscape C:\Users\l.uroy.julia\packages\Circuitscape\Qr6wW\src\run.jl:31
[6] top-level scope
@ REPL[9]:1

However, I have no error when I do this with the "one-to-all" mode.

Please find all input files and the .ini file associated at the following link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wdBCJvFvKUArEZjF4MaRfYS9NPawzo-q?usp=sharing

Thank you for your attention to this matter,

Léa

[ranjanan]

@luroy the header of your include / exclude pairs file should have the words "mode" and "include"/"exclude" like https://github.com/Circuitscape/Circuitscape.jl/blob/master/test/input/raster/pairwise/17/pairs_to_include.txt, yours has "X1" and "X2". Having said that, a more sensible error message is in order.

[luroy]

@ranjanan thank you very much for your answer. I'm really sorry. In trying to report about the error I get when the file is correctly formatted (#311), I induced this error by formatting the file incorrectly...

[ranjanan]

No worries at all @luroy, please don't apologize. Your issues add value to this project by improving it's functionality and polish. 😄 Thanks a lot for reaching out and being involved!

[ranjanan]

I will check out #311 shortly.