Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package #50

Open
dataPulverizer opened this issue Jun 15, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@dataPulverizer
Copy link

There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package

@John-Colvin
Copy link
Member

Could be done as a dub sub-package?

@dataPulverizer
Copy link
Author

dataPulverizer commented Jun 15, 2016

I didn't know about sub-dub, just looked at it in the manual. You guys know more about the DUB packaging system in which I am still a novice but my thinking is that lapack can exist as a library with cblas binding as a dependency that DUB can manage.

At the moment we have scid, mir, others, cblas. It may be a good idea for packages to be fragmented to allow users to piece what they want together until things solidify a bit more.

@kyllingstad
Copy link
Member

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the sub-package idea. Deimos is also an option.

@John-Colvin
Copy link
Member

I agree, it should be a separate package entirely
On 16 Jun 2016 1:37 p.m., "Lars T. Kyllingstad" [email protected]
wrote:

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under
DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the
sub-package idea. Deimos https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos is
also an option.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#50 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABx9tdm4jCgE5NQIL7jIFr87GHyrkblpks5qMUN4gaJpZM4I2sdo
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants