Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question about Expansion function #3

Open
thuanpv opened this issue Oct 28, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Question about Expansion function #3

thuanpv opened this issue Oct 28, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@thuanpv
Copy link
Collaborator

thuanpv commented Oct 28, 2020

Looking at the current implementation (https://github.com/Alan32Liu/AFLNet_MCTS/blob/2945f1097223fab28ff81404f55121ba9d4d89be/MCTS/TreeNode.c#L445), I think Expansion does not take into account the cases in which response_codes list contains more than one new states/response codes. Am I right?
@DonggeLiu
Copy link
Owner

Yep, it does not distinguish multiple new states from one in each trace.
For each trace of response codes, if it contains one new state/code, then that trace is new.
If fuzzing a seed finds multiple traces, then we repeat it for each trace.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thuanpv @DonggeLiu