You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current reference set pages, such as for the lung reference sets, are extremely difficult to manage.
The page essentially consists of a large "typed table" block with 16 columns. Table editing in Wagtail is not the greatest:
Wagtail's editing column is narrow. This is fine for a table with three to five columns, but untenable for 16
columns
The table also has 10 rows, requiring more scrolling
Many of the columns are blank; combined with the many rows, this means that when updating or adding new cells, it's difficult to tell which value goes in which columns (the column headings are hidden way off the scrolled page at the top—and combined with the narrow editing column, it's easy to get lost)
Many of the columns are blank—however blank cells are not allowed in a typed table! This means having to look up a special Unicode character "U+2060", also known as "WORD JOINER", and pasting that into cells that should be blank. Only one person in on the team knows how to even produce such a character!
Jackie Dahlgren and others at the DMCC have tried to update the page themselves and give up because of these challenges.
🎇 What Solution You'd Like
The reference sets should instead of a specific page model with fill-in-the-blank forms that can be edited by anyone—include the DMCC!
The model would consist of
Optional organ name: plain text
Optional protocol ID: a pick-list from existing protocols
Reference set title: optional hyperlink to an existing page or document
Cases, Controls, Total participants: three optional integer fields
Participant groups: optional plain text
Specimen type: a pick list to types of specimens
Number of specimens: optional integer field, formatted with commas for convenient display since the numbers can get large
Volume range: optional plain text
Radio buttons: specimens at NCI-F, discovery set, follow-up data, pathology, image files incident cancer
The radio buttons would be:
Yes
No
Unknown
TBD
This way, updating a single reference set or adding a new one would be as easy as filling out a form.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🤔 Tell Us About the Feature
The current reference set pages, such as for the lung reference sets, are extremely difficult to manage.
The page essentially consists of a large "typed table" block with 16 columns. Table editing in Wagtail is not the greatest:
columns
Jackie Dahlgren and others at the DMCC have tried to update the page themselves and give up because of these challenges.
🎇 What Solution You'd Like
The reference sets should instead of a specific page model with fill-in-the-blank forms that can be edited by anyone—include the DMCC!
The model would consist of
The radio buttons would be:
This way, updating a single reference set or adding a new one would be as easy as filling out a form.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: