You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran hyperex on sequences from the SILVA (v138.1, U translated to T) database
on a Linux distribution (Ubuntu), using the binary distribution (v0.1.0) and also
the v0.1.1 from the cargo install.
Its works well at the beginning of the multifasta but crashes at one
sequences and then stops (same issue, using the v0.1.0 or the v0.1.1)
The error message is the following:
thread 'main' panicked at 'slice index starts at 1388 but ends at 294', src/utils.rs:404:42
....
26: 0x561cc0688038 - main
27: 0x7f9b3f61c083 - __libc_start_main
28: 0x561cc06163ca - _start
29: 0x0 - <unknown>
Aborted (core dumped)
According to a previous Issues (#3), you mentionned that the sequence is in reverse
and if I understand well, version 0.1.1 should have corrected the problem.
Is it the case ? Or can you give some hints for correcting the bug for
people in fluent in rush ? for example, just how to skip the
sequence without crash in order to get all other sequences processed ?
I have a toy sequence that I succeed to extract from the SILVA DB for testing
the problem using the v1v2 region if needed.
$ ./hyperex-0.1.0/hyperex -V
hyperex 0.1.0
$ ./hyperex-0.1.0/hyperex --region v1v2 seq-that-failed-v1v2.fa --force 2> err
[13:53:02][INFO] This is hyperex v0.1.0
[13:53:02][INFO] Written by Anicet Ebou
[13:53:02][INFO] Available at https://github.com/Ebedthan/hyperex.git
[13:53:02][INFO] Localtime is 13:53:02
[13:53:02][INFO] You are dmestivier
[13:53:02][INFO] Operating system is Linux
[13:53:02][WARN] Overwriting hyperex_out.fa and hyperex_out.gff files
[13:53:02][INFO] Sequence type is DNA
[13:53:02][WARN] Sequence length is less than 1500 bp. We may not be able to find some regions
Aborted (core dumped)
$ ~/.cargo/bin/hyperex --region v1v2 seq-that-failed-v1v2.fa --force > out 2> err
Aborted (core dumped)
$ head -4 err
thread 'main' panicked at 'slice index starts at 1388 but ends at 294', /home/dmestivier/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/hyperex-0.1.1/src/utils.rs:404:42
stack backtrace:
0: 0x5569312d33fb - std::backtrace_rs::backtrace::libunwind::trace::h909d8dc7fbe5a4dc
at /build/rustc-K9H5El/rustc-1.59.0+dfsg1~ubuntu1~llvm/library/std/src/../../backtrace/src/backtrace/libunwind.rs:93:5
Thank you for the great job and any for any ideas.
Sincerely yours
Denis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I try to something after reading a little big about RUST.
I add a test in the "utils.rs" file (line 391, hyperex 0.2.0) like this 👍
if !region.is_empty() {
//dm <2022-07-30 sam.>: if sequence forward_start > reverse_start
//==> CRASH
// with 'thread 'main' panicked at 'slice index starts at X but ends at Y X>Y
// We test and do not output such situation...
if forward_start < reverse_start {
fasta_writer.write_record(
&fasta::Record::with_attrs(
record.id(),
It works well and do not crash anymore.
However, I am not sure of what to do for the other situations ( forward_start > reverse_start) and I am not sure that
it comes from an inverted sequence.
Dear developers,
Thank you for your very helpful work.
I ran
hyperex
on sequences from the SILVA (v138.1, U translated to T) databaseon a Linux distribution (Ubuntu), using the binary distribution (v0.1.0) and also
the v0.1.1 from the
cargo
install.Its works well at the beginning of the multifasta but crashes at one
sequences and then stops (same issue, using the v0.1.0 or the v0.1.1)
The error message is the following:
According to a previous Issues (#3), you mentionned that the sequence is in reverse
and if I understand well, version 0.1.1 should have corrected the problem.
Is it the case ? Or can you give some hints for correcting the bug for
people in fluent in rush ? for example, just how to skip the
sequence without crash in order to get all other sequences processed ?
I have a toy sequence that I succeed to extract from the SILVA DB for testing
the problem using the v1v2 region if needed.
Thank you for the great job and any for any ideas.
Sincerely yours
Denis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: