-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-10-24] [$250] Track - User appears with offline avatar on Submit expense page for distance request #48476
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @zanyrenney ( |
@zanyrenney FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.User appears with offline avatar on Submit expense page for distance request What is the root cause of that problem?We don't want to include the p2p option if it's distance request in
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Solution 1. We shouldn't show the What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
Edited by proposal-police: This proposal was edited at 2024-09-03 20:55:23 UTC. ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Track - User appears with offline avatar on Submit expense page for distance request What is the root cause of that problem?We are passing
so all p2p/dm reports are filtered out and the user is only being added as a new invitee/ userToInvite , hence the offline avatar.
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Because we are allowing P2P distance request when it is submitted from tracked expense we need to include P2P for action
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Because we currently allow p2p distance request when App/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionItem.tsx Lines 425 to 432 in fc33ac1
|
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021832021050151052347 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @abdulrahuman5196 ( |
adding external to get a contributor to take a look at the propsals. |
@abdulrahuman5196, @zanyrenney Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
@abdulrahuman5196, @zanyrenney Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too... |
Checking now |
Updated to add alternative approach |
bump @abdulrahuman5196 can you review please? |
📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸 |
@abdulrahuman5196, @zanyrenney Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this? |
@zanyrenney What is the expectation here? I am only getting Screen.Recording.2024-09-17.at.9.09.29.PM.mov |
@abdulrahuman5196 @zanyrenney this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
just tried again and can't repro this, so going to close. |
@abdulrahuman5196 PR ready |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.49-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-24. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
payment summary @FitseTLT requires payment automatic offer (Contributor) - paid $250 on upwork |
We don't need a regression test here. |
@zanyrenney Why shouldn't this one get a regression test? Also, can you and @abdulrahuman5196 please fill out and complete the BZ checklist? |
I thought it was spotted in a testrail session from the OP, so it is already covered in TestRail. Is that incorrect? @tgolen |
Definitely can update the checklist though! @abdulrahuman5196 please can you add the answers on this |
bump @abdulrahuman5196 please complete the checklist |
I also thought this. Anyways will complete checklist |
I don't think a specific PR caused this issue. Could be due to different changes made between projects.
N/A
N/A since couldn't be covered part of reviewer checklist.
Yes.
|
Hey @abdulrahuman5196 mind doing this in the correct format from the checklist please? You have missed a bunch of the questions out. |
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Hi, Updated the checklist. |
Complete! |
$250 approved for @abdulrahuman5196 |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.0.28-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/4913193&group_by=cases:section_id&group_id=309130&group_order=asc
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
User should be displayed with default/custom avatar photo
Actual Result:
User appears with offline avatar on Submit expense page for distance request
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6591566_1725358268612.Recording__3856.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @zanyrenneyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: