-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-11-11] Remove redundant reassure tests and improve documentation #51637
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 ( |
Hi! I'm Olimpia from Callstack and I'd like to work on this issue. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.56-9 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-11. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
@mountiny @strepanier03 The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
Coming from this proposal in Slack.
Problem:
There are redundant/flaky performance tests in the Reassure suite. These tests are difficult to maintain and provide low value, as their scenarios are already covered elsewhere or offer little regression detection. This creates unnecessary complexity, slows down the test suite, and increases the likelihood of false positives.
Solution:
Remove the redundant tests that verify scenarios already covered in separate tests. Eliminate tests that check interactions with minimal impact on regression detection. Focus on retaining tests that provide high-value regression coverage, and reorganize the test suites for better maintainability by moving essential tests to lower levels where they are easier to manage.
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @strepanier03The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: