Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align prop and misc identifier requirements for the official FedRAMP namespace #773

Open
11 of 15 tasks
aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
11 of 15 tasks

Comments

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

This is a ...

improvement - something could be better

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Registry
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Content
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP System Security Plans (SSP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Plans (SAP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Results (SAR)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Validations

User Story

As a developer of OSCAL-based tools for FedRAMP documentation, I would like alignment on the properties @ns, @system and other identifier URIs that FedRAMP uses in different variations in their customization of the upstream custom models.

Goals

  • Document a uniform approach in a decision record
  • Review and update constraints accordingly
  • Update website documentation accordingly

Dependencies

N/A

Acceptance Criteria

  • All FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption (https://github.com/GSA/fedramp-automation) affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

No response

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Rene2mt volunteer to start this off for now and work on the ADR to start.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants