You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Guiomar has proposed that it may make sense to add information about the utility frequency at the place where a study has been conducted. We are wondering whether there may be a scenario where such information is useful and the person needing it cannot extract it either from the paper (participant sample description) or from the data that they are reanalysing (frequency spectrum) - it would be good to add questions that someone may make use of, but it is also important not to burden users with unnecessary questions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PowerLineFrequency is documented in BIDS datasets as a required field.
The frequency of the power line is either 50 or 60 Hz, and from information in the paper it might be deduced from the specification where the lab is located (although not trivial in the case of Japan, where 50 and 60 are both used). It is not a piece of information commonly specified in papers, and as reader/reviewer I am not missing it. If there are potential concerns with power-line affecting the interpretation (e.g. when studying gamma-band activity), then that is usually explicitly discussed.
Guiomar has proposed that it may make sense to add information about the utility frequency at the place where a study has been conducted. We are wondering whether there may be a scenario where such information is useful and the person needing it cannot extract it either from the paper (participant sample description) or from the data that they are reanalysing (frequency spectrum) - it would be good to add questions that someone may make use of, but it is also important not to burden users with unnecessary questions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: