-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can BigStitcher-Spark do fusion on a downsampled resolution (s1)? #18
Comments
Hi, sorry, I missed that ... yes, it can do it multiple ways. The easiest would be to define your own downsampling steps (see here): BigStitcher-Spark/src/main/java/net/preibisch/bigstitcher/spark/AffineFusion.java Lines 107 to 108 in 7eaf5be
You could also simply apply a transformation to all views in BigStitcher that sets a downsampling as you want (e.g. 2,2,2 or 2,2,1) and then normally fuse knowing s0 is actually s1. Please let me know if I can help with the details of both approaches ... |
Thanks Stephan! It is very straightfoward and I will try this. I have noticed this |
@StephanPreibisch I tried your suggestion by adding I am able to revert to the older version and run without Below is my command and the log. Thanks so much!
|
Can BigStitcher-Spark do fusion based on
s1
instead ofs0
resolution?For large data (20 tiles; 2TB), this would be a very useful feature, as in many cases
s1
, and evens2
s3
are enough for downstream tasks. I know this can be done by first fusing as0
image and then generating a multi-resolution pyramid. But it is not clear to me that if we can directly generate a downsampled fused image.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: