Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add brightest interestpoint filtering to match-interestpoint step in interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY mode #30

Open
kgabor opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kgabor
Copy link
Contributor

kgabor commented May 2, 2024

In our data, the overlapping tile areas are significantly photobleached due to second acquisition exposure.
We observe a factor of 10 difference in the number of detected interestpoints (with the same intensity and threshold parameters) in the pariwise overlapping area between the tiles. This can disrupt the geometric descriptor based matching.

As interestpoint intensities can be available, we propose the introduction of --pairwiseBrightest=N option for the --interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY case. If N>0, then in the pairwise matching step, the number of interestpoints should be limited to the min(N,N_ta,N_tb) brightest ones on each tile in the pairwise overlapping area. (N_ta, N_tb is the number of points in the tileA pairwise overlapping area and tileB pairwise overlapping area respectively.) So that the number of interestpoints becomes equal that go into the descriptor based matching and the brightest ones supposed to be the same on both tiles.
(Or maybe min(N, 2* N_ta, 2* N_tb) to allow for some noisy detections.)

@kgabor kgabor changed the title Add brightest interestpoint filtering to matching-interestpoint step in interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY mode Add brightest interestpoint filtering to match-interestpoint step in interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY mode May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant