You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our data, the overlapping tile areas are significantly photobleached due to second acquisition exposure.
We observe a factor of 10 difference in the number of detected interestpoints (with the same intensity and threshold parameters) in the pariwise overlapping area between the tiles. This can disrupt the geometric descriptor based matching.
As interestpoint intensities can be available, we propose the introduction of --pairwiseBrightest=N option for the --interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY case. If N>0, then in the pairwise matching step, the number of interestpoints should be limited to the min(N,N_ta,N_tb) brightest ones on each tile in the pairwise overlapping area. (N_ta, N_tb is the number of points in the tileA pairwise overlapping area and tileB pairwise overlapping area respectively.) So that the number of interestpoints becomes equal that go into the descriptor based matching and the brightest ones supposed to be the same on both tiles.
(Or maybe min(N, 2* N_ta, 2* N_tb) to allow for some noisy detections.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kgabor
changed the title
Add brightest interestpoint filtering to matching-interestpoint step in interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY mode
Add brightest interestpoint filtering to match-interestpoint step in interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY mode
May 2, 2024
In our data, the overlapping tile areas are significantly photobleached due to second acquisition exposure.
We observe a factor of 10 difference in the number of detected interestpoints (with the same intensity and threshold parameters) in the pariwise overlapping area between the tiles. This can disrupt the geometric descriptor based matching.
As interestpoint intensities can be available, we propose the introduction of
--pairwiseBrightest=N
option for the--interestpointsForReg=OVERLAPPING_ONLY
case. If N>0, then in the pairwise matching step, the number of interestpoints should be limited to the min(N,N_ta,N_tb) brightest ones on each tile in the pairwise overlapping area. (N_ta, N_tb is the number of points in the tileA pairwise overlapping area and tileB pairwise overlapping area respectively.) So that the number of interestpoints becomes equal that go into the descriptor based matching and the brightest ones supposed to be the same on both tiles.(Or maybe min(N, 2* N_ta, 2* N_tb) to allow for some noisy detections.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: