Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure compedium into a knowledge wiki #108

Open
capsulecorplab opened this issue May 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Restructure compedium into a knowledge wiki #108

capsulecorplab opened this issue May 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@capsulecorplab
Copy link
Member

capsulecorplab commented May 1, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The code-coffee-compendium resource page should serve more as a zettelkasten/wiki-like knowledge base rather than a documentation page, as to be able to link between related notes/ideas in a structured approach for greater discoverability of content - i.e., a choose your own adventure resource page for LTC community members.

Describe the solution you'd like
Convert the code-coffee-compendium into a personal knowledge management system, using an open-source markdown-based tools s.a., Dendron

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
Desired outcomes include:

@capsulecorplab capsulecorplab pinned this issue Jun 27, 2022
@capsulecorplab
Copy link
Member Author

Reading more into Dendron, it natively supports an approach called hierarchical note taking which (from what I understand) is similar to the Dewey Decimal System but for structuring notes through an iterative process using schemas. I think this is the right approach moving forward with converting the current compendium into a knowledge base.

@capsulecorplab capsulecorplab added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant