Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect work of role accesses in API #1175

Open
awersate opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Incorrect work of role accesses in API #1175

awersate opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@awersate
Copy link

awersate commented Jul 8, 2022

When adding access to view a generic object to a role, I cannot see this field through api
Through ui role access works correctly
Screenshot_1

to get access through api, you need to give the role access to everything and start taking away unnecessary
but at the same time, having taken away the rights to view the generic object, I still see it
Screenshot_2
I checked on other fields such as vm, service, requests, etc., but did not find similar behavior
I repeat that through ui the fields are displayed correctly

@Fryguy Fryguy transferred this issue from ManageIQ/manageiq Jul 20, 2022
@Fryguy Fryguy added the bug label Jul 20, 2022
@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Feb 27, 2023
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Feb 27, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@miq-bot miq-bot closed this as completed May 29, 2023
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 29, 2023

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

Feel free to reopen this issue if this issue is still valid.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@kbrock kbrock reopened this Jul 13, 2023
@kbrock kbrock removed the stale label Jul 13, 2023
@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Oct 16, 2023
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 16, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@kbrock kbrock removed the stale label Oct 17, 2023
@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Jan 22, 2024
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 22, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

2 similar comments
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Apr 29, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 5, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants