You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering whether scVI dimensions can be used with miloR. Specifically, each cell is transformed into a low dimensional latent vector of normal random variables. The issue I see possibly occurring is that this vector only has 10 dimensions, instead of your typical 20-40 for PCs. Using algorithms like Leiden and UMAP, I've been getting pretty good results just based on the 10D scVI output (it is basically a latent embedding and used like PCs) . However, I wasn't quite sure how heavily this would affect miloR specifically.
Hi all,
I was wondering whether scVI dimensions can be used with miloR. Specifically, each cell is transformed into a low dimensional latent vector of normal random variables. The issue I see possibly occurring is that this vector only has 10 dimensions, instead of your typical 20-40 for PCs. Using algorithms like Leiden and UMAP, I've been getting pretty good results just based on the 10D scVI output (it is basically a latent embedding and used like PCs) . However, I wasn't quite sure how heavily this would affect miloR specifically.
Publication for reference:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-018-0229-2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: