-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ground temperature at locations (x, y, z) #265
Comments
@MassimoCimmino |
No, this feature is not ready yet. Note that soil temperatures are not necessary for the simulation of GCHP systems using g-functions. |
@MassimoCimmino |
Will this request be fed through Will the required input be a Is it possible to consider a segment-to-point thermal response where the point has no thermal emission? |
Yes, this would be part of the options in the I would support two options:
Thermal response factors will be calculated in some |
These concepts are detailed in literature, but I emphasize the distinction from CFD due to the vastly different methodologies. While direct comparisons to high-quality CFD calculations will be valuable, until the feature described here is implemented, you may want to investigate utilizing the borehole wall temperature profiles. The borehole wall temperature profiles can be calculated by setting pygfunction/examples/unequal_segments.py Lines 91 to 97 in 78fb638
|
@j-c-cook |
This issue is to implement the evaluation of field-to-point thermal response factors to evaluate ground temperatures at precise locations in the ground.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: