Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFE] Children for Same-Sex Marriages #5057

Open
5 tasks done
WeaverThree opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
5 tasks done

[RFE] Children for Same-Sex Marriages #5057

WeaverThree opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Personnel Personnel-related Issues (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations

Comments

@WeaverThree
Copy link
Collaborator

Prerequisites and Pre-Issue Checklist

  • I'm reporting the RFE to the correct repository:

  • MegaMek

  • MegaMekLab

  • MekHQ

  • Does this conform with our Content Policy linked above?

  • I've searched the GitHub tracker and haven't found a similar feature request listed

RFE Details *

This is an improvement to an existing feature

Brief Description *

A new pair of campaign options to allow children for same-sex marriages: one for adopted children and one perhaps called 'other' that covers scientific methods of babymaking.

These could also be allowed for oppostie-sex couples, come to think of it. More checkboxes for the checkbox god?

MekHQ Suite Version *

v0.50.1-SNAPSHOT: 2024-10-15 or thereabouts

Attach Files

No response

Final Checklist

  • I've checked to make sure that this RFE has not already been filed
  • I am requesting implementation of only one relevant set of features in this ticket for clarity and focus
@WeaverThree WeaverThree added the (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations label Oct 17, 2024
@WeaverThree WeaverThree changed the title [RFE] Children for Same-Sex marriages [RFE] Children for Same-Sex Marriages Oct 17, 2024
@repligator repligator added the Personnel Personnel-related Issues label Oct 17, 2024
@IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

While I agree that this would be a pretty awesome thing to add, I've taken a (quick) feasibility review and I get the impression adding this would be quite involved. Especially as we would need to incorporate any changes into the simulated relationship history system.

@WeaverThree
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh, yeah. I've never looked at that stuff, I imagine it's a bit complicated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Personnel Personnel-related Issues (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants