You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we are limited to 10 models, due to hard coding the rose-meta.conf file with this many sections. If you want to run more than that you are required to first modify the rose-meta.conf (and a single line in jinja_utils.py).
Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally we'd dynamically allow this at runtime, however rose config-edit doesn't support this. Instead we could follow the example of the RES, and have a script to generate the rose-meta.conf with the required number of models. With this it would be easier for people to add their own limit, or even for us to ship a much higher default limit (e.g. hundreds).
Describe alternatives you've considered
This might not actually be needed, as no one I've talked to can think of a case where you would be comparing more than 10 different models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just for the record, I have been contacted by people asking if the Regional Evaluation Suite could be made to do more than 10 models. It's very infrequent but it has happened in the past.
What problem does your feature request solve?
Currently we are limited to 10 models, due to hard coding the
rose-meta.conf
file with this many sections. If you want to run more than that you are required to first modify therose-meta.conf
(and a single line injinja_utils.py
).Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally we'd dynamically allow this at runtime, however rose config-edit doesn't support this. Instead we could follow the example of the RES, and have a script to generate the
rose-meta.conf
with the required number of models. With this it would be easier for people to add their own limit, or even for us to ship a much higher default limit (e.g. hundreds).Describe alternatives you've considered
This might not actually be needed, as no one I've talked to can think of a case where you would be comparing more than 10 different models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: