Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capturing device data related to ARIs #154

Open
mfarina1 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Capturing device data related to ARIs #154

mfarina1 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mfarina1
Copy link
Collaborator

mfarina1 commented Oct 9, 2024

As we were looking to create a page that would show a health report for node and the traffic it was received in relation to ARIs, a lot of that data wasn't even being collected on the device. Fixing this could be good for backend development.

@mfarina1 mfarina1 added bug Something isn't working CRIT-4 Defect means software does not work as originally intended. labels Oct 9, 2024
@mfarina1 mfarina1 added this to the ANMS v1.2.0 milestone Oct 9, 2024
@mfarina1 mfarina1 added this to ANMS Oct 9, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in ANMS Oct 9, 2024
@mfarina1 mfarina1 added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working CRIT-4 Defect means software does not work as originally intended. labels Oct 9, 2024
@mfarina1 mfarina1 removed this from the ANMS v1.2.0 milestone Oct 22, 2024
@mfarina1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

According to @BrianSipos, we're not recording the data per device/node and the difficulty relates to the mechanisms of ADMs and ION, not necessarily ANMS. It's not an ANMS responsibility to figure out how to collect this data. ION does not collect per-hope node data, for example, and anything that involves modifying the "bookkeeping" of ION is troublesome. Also note that ANMS does not care about the semantics of its collected data (like counters).

All that being said, this issue is being removed from the ANMS v1.2 milestone because it is not necessarily an ANMS development issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant