Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve filtering functionality in tk.bio interface #60

Open
mbrush opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Improve filtering functionality in tk.bio interface #60

mbrush opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mbrush
Copy link

mbrush commented Sep 20, 2017

Finding the types of concepts and statements one wants is currently challenging. Some simple enhancements to filtering functionality that could improve this:

  1. Fix Relation Filtering: This is a very valuable feature that is currently not working. Also, it would be nice if the user was presented with a dropdown of all relations used in statements in the table so they could select one or more to filter/facet on.

  2. Fix Statement Filtering by Semantic Type: Also doesn’t seem to be working. e.g. after filtering to select Genes, statements that have nothing to do with Genes are still returned. I assume the desired functionality here is to return only statements where the S or O is tagged with the Gene semantic type.

  3. Allow users to select multiple types when setting filters.

  4. Allow filtering by source from within the concept and statement results tables. Currently filtering by source is only available outside the context of search results.

@RichardBruskiewich
Copy link
Collaborator

Enhancement #1 above triggers fresh API issues: see NCATS-Tangerine/beacon-aggregator#21

@RichardBruskiewich
Copy link
Collaborator

The semantic type filtering does seem to work but the text filtering does not. I will continue to investigate.

@lhannest
Copy link
Member

@YinglunQ We can pair program this if you have any questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants