Question about SPEC2006 Evaluation in Bi-Weekly Report Dated 20231127 #2511
Answered
by
cebarobot
Mygithub0N
asked this question in
Q&A
-
[ORIGINAL TITLE] 关于双周报20231127期spec2006测评问题 认真看了双周报,有以下几个问题需要请教一下
能否回答一下我这几个疑问, 非常感谢! [TRANSLATION]
I would greatly appreciate it if you could answer these questions. Thank you very much! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
cebarobot
Nov 28, 2023
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
[TRANSLATION]
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
cebarobot
-
hi,
如果我想复现一遍,是全部都在虚拟模型上进行吗?能否给一些详细的步骤或资料,谢谢!
…-----原始邮件-----
发件人:ceba ***@***.***>
发送时间:2023-11-28 11:04:25 (星期二)
收件人: OpenXiangShan/XiangShan ***@***.***>
抄送: Junior ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
主题: Re: [OpenXiangShan/XiangShan] Question about SPEC2006 Evaluation in Bi-Weekly Report Dated 20231127 (Discussion #2511)
我们使用 Verilator 对整个处理器核仿真(包括L2、L3 Cache),使用DRAMsim3来模拟内存延迟,没有额外特殊的部分了。
请参考我们此前有关使用 SimPoint 分析 SPEC2006 的报告(视频, 演示文稿)。
是完整的 Linux 。
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
hi,
我有关注你们发双周报,会报告spec2006在模型上做simpoint仿真结果,因此,也想试试这个流程!香山性能模型我能拿到吗?
多谢!
…-----原始邮件-----
发件人:ceba ***@***.***>
发送时间:2024-02-01 21:42:14 (星期四)
收件人: OpenXiangShan/XiangShan ***@***.***>
抄送: Junior ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
主题: Re: [OpenXiangShan/XiangShan] Question about SPEC2006 Evaluation in Bi-Weekly Report Dated 20231127 (Discussion #2511)
我们目前没有复现 SPEC CPU 2006 分数的详细步骤,您可以参考香山官方文档做尝试。
We have not documented the detail of how to reproduce SPEC CPU 2006. Please refer to XiangShan Document.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
[TRANSLATION]