Replies: 2 comments
-
Agree it would be beneficial to leave to the user to decide libc target, I've also run into cases where I need the glibc version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It appears that the issue with static linking glibc is the Rust standard lib, mentioned here. These are the warnings I come up against when static linking with glibc, though it appears that none of these functions are actually used.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It would be nice to support other libc implementations in our standard lib.
It would also be nice to have a nostd version (Maybe by excluding the string functions)
This is a placeholder to discuss possible strategies regarding the standard lib
See #924
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions