Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An attempt to make the schema and filters more useful to Value for Value novices #156

Conversation

dwvisser
Copy link
Contributor

@dwvisser dwvisser commented Mar 6, 2022

Closes #152

I see this PR as the start of a conversation. Obviously, I'm a newcomer here, and there may be history and semantics I'm not aware of with Value for Value. The exact meaning of Value (Other) is perhaps unclear, for instance. Does it actually imply something separate from Boostagrams and SAT Streaming? Should there be a separate Value (Boost) element, for boosts without attached messages, or is that implied by support for Boostagrams?

Here is the commit description:

Replaced elements "Value", "Boostagrams" and "Sat Streaming" with
"Value (Other)", "Value (Boostagrams)", and "Value (SAT Streaming)"
respectively. In apps.json, I assumed that if either of the latter
two were present, then "Value (Other)" was redundant and could be
removed.

Replaced elements "Value", "Boostagrams" and "Sat Streaming" with
"Value (Other)", "Value (Boostagrams)", and "Value (SAT Streaming)"
respectively. In apps.json, I assumed that if either of the latter
two were present, then "Value (Other)" was redundant and could be
removed.
@dwvisser dwvisser closed this Mar 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is the Supported Element "Value" or "Sat Streaming"?
1 participant