-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the official OWL RL tests part of the project #14
Comments
Artur, I believe that's this: UPDATE found it: https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0155 The link to the original |
It seems like I do not see any license associated with the file, so I wonder if we can include it as part of the project? |
I agree (as I said in your PR now approved) that we really do need the official test to actually know how the tool is performing in a comprehensive manner. I hope we can all start to outline the full set of tests first and then start chipping away at implementing them all soon. I may have more time to contribute over summer (Dec - Feb, here in Australia!), |
A series of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation workshops should be probably also mentioned here, namely:
|
The readme file states this version passes the full batch of official OWL Full/RL tests. It would be good to make the tests part of the project to make collaboration easier and more constructive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: