You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently using DOUBLE PRECISION ARRAY. Could use NUMERIC ARRAY instead. Most streams have values with not many digits in them, so NUMERIC ARRAY with low parameters could be quite efficient. If some streams have more digits in, consider using separate "big" and "small" waveform tables to maximise storage efficiency (at some cost to user friendliness - could be improved with an SQL view that is the union of both tables?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently using DOUBLE PRECISION ARRAY. Could use NUMERIC ARRAY instead. Most streams have values with not many digits in them, so NUMERIC ARRAY with low parameters could be quite efficient. If some streams have more digits in, consider using separate "big" and "small" waveform tables to maximise storage efficiency (at some cost to user friendliness - could be improved with an SQL view that is the union of both tables?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: