You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there already an SWC entry for the keeping secret vulnerability [1][2]? The issue occurs when a contracts, e.g., a multi-player game needs to store secret information, e.g., for the next move of a player, and it just stores this information in a private field. However, for writing the field there needs to be a transaction, which makes the value public and a player might get an advantage because of this.
If there is no related entry may I just write one?
Is there already an SWC entry for the keeping secret vulnerability [1][2]? The issue occurs when a contracts, e.g., a multi-player game needs to store secret information, e.g., for the next move of a player, and it just stores this information in a private field. However, for writing the field there needs to be a transaction, which makes the value public and a player might get an advantage because of this.
If there is no related entry may I just write one?
[1] Atzei, Nicola, Massimo Bartoletti, and Tiziana Cimoli. "A survey of attacks on Ethereum smart contracts." IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2016 (2016): 1007.
[2] https://medium.com/solidified/keeping-secrets-on-ethereum-5b556c3bb1ee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: