Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filtering: (UTTP Bots) #1111

Open
chi213b opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

Filtering: (UTTP Bots) #1111

chi213b opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
Filtering Suggestion Filtering behavior issues, etc

Comments

@chi213b
Copy link

chi213b commented Apr 30, 2024

Filter Mode

Auto-Smart Mode

Select the Problem

A type of spammer is not detected at all

(Optional) If 'Other', Enter Very Short Description

Detect Uttp Bots

Spammer Example / Sample

WHO‎ ASKED‎ +‎ MY‎ CONTENT‎ IS‎ WAY‎ BETTER‎ U‎T‎T‎P‎ IS WAY BETTER‎ TH‎AN "channel name"
image

Video / Post Link

No response

(Optional) Additional Info / Context

They target popular youtubers such as sharkblox dannodraws and more

@chi213b chi213b added the Filtering Suggestion Filtering behavior issues, etc label Apr 30, 2024
@virophagesp
Copy link

they are detected

@restorerootfs
Copy link

I'd like to add that the bot has gone too far now, saying "First warning n*****" and this is really needed

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 4, 2024

also add that the bot started saying "It would be hillarious if ___ had a sudden stroke or heart attack because my content better"
These messages are super offensive, more offensive than the other messages

@virophagesp
Copy link

unfortunately they have found a technique which involves adding randomized characters at the end of their messages to make them not identical and so not detected as spam

@creeperita09
Copy link

Shouldn't be to hard to block any comments from usernames like UTTP or officer and that contains messges like my content is better, who asked +

@restorerootfs
Copy link

restorerootfs commented Jul 30, 2024 via email

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Jul 31, 2024
@hawl1
Copy link

hawl1 commented Aug 1, 2024

unfortunately they have found a technique which involves adding randomized characters at the end of their messages to make them not identical and so not detected as spam

"Oh no, we cannot get rid of UTTP!"
regex pattern named: (?i)(?:‬?‭?‮?\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[P9]|[P9]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*‬?‭?‮?)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 10, 2024

unfortunately they have found a technique which involves adding randomized characters at the end of their messages to make them not identical and so not detected as spam

"Oh no, we cannot get rid of UTTP!" regex pattern named: (?i)(?:‬?‭?‮?\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[P9]|[P9]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*‬?‭?‮?)

So this blocks stuff like Ú779 in addition to UTTP.

@hawl1
Copy link

hawl1 commented Aug 13, 2024

unfortunately they have found a technique which involves adding randomized characters at the end of their messages to make them not identical and so not detected as spam

"Oh no, we cannot get rid of UTTP!" regex pattern named: (?i)(?:‬?‭?‮?\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[P9]|[P9]\s*[T7]\s*[T7]\s*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų]\s*‬?‭?‮?)

So this blocks stuff like Ú779 in addition to UTTP.

absolutely since its kind of a way of saying UTTP, i think.
though i updated it to support tag spaces bypassing

(?i)(?:???(?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[T7](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[T7](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[P9]|[P9](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[T7](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[T7](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*[UÚÙÛÜŮŪŰŲuúùûüůūűų](?:\s|<[^>]*>|\p{Cf}|[\U000E0000-\U000E007F])*??

and now it is in python flavor of regex.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Filtering Suggestion Filtering behavior issues, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants