Uniform four-digit numbers? #32
thejohnfreeman
started this conversation in
Ideas (pre standard proposal)
Replies: 3 comments
-
Yes, this makes a lot of sense imo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
OK, I'm going to update the existing proposals 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
As I've done in this standard proposal 0015. XLS15d: Concise Transaction Identifier we can prefix with the left 0 padded number without losing the 'canonical name' of the standard which is easy to reference and human readable, e.g. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Excluding leading zeroes from specification numbers leads to "bad" ordering in most filesystems, and on GitHub. I propose we use four-digit numbers with leading zeroes for all spec numbers (in filenames and URIs at least), just like PEPs and RFCs. I suspect we won't hit 10,000 proposals any time soon.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions