Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A dilution.stepsize argument might be useful #5

Open
SamT123 opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

A dilution.stepsize argument might be useful #5

SamT123 opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@SamT123
Copy link
Contributor

SamT123 commented Nov 22, 2023

Hi Sam!

I'm working with some data where titers are calculated by estimating ID50 by some curve fitting method, which gives continuous valued titers. In this case, a "<20" titer is not the same as "<=10", like it is for the 2-fold dilution data we normally work with. In this case, it would be good for ablandscapes to treat it as "<=20", rather than converting it to "<=10" (which I believe happens in the titers_to_logtiters function). I can get around this by converting "<20" to "<40" before I pass the titers to ablandscapes, but it would be not to have to do this. A nice way to do this might be to use a dilution.stepsize argument like in your meantiter package?

(When I've got a bit of time I might come back and implement this if you think it would be a useful addition)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant