-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize #3729
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…Width and clientHeight
✅ Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Bundle Stats — desktop-clientHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger
Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — loot-coreHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset No files were changed View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
@MatissJanis FYI I had to remove the module cache since it's only caching the first module that is loaded and re-uses that even when the |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of changes primarily focused on updating the import paths for the In addition to the import path changes, some components have been enhanced with new props or minor adjustments to their internal logic, such as the addition of Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThe pull request primarily involves a restructuring of import statements across multiple components in the In addition to the import path updates, some components, such as Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-29
: Consider adding a memoization layer for performance.The component correctly implements dynamic loading based on width, which fixes the iPad PWA resize issue. However, the importer function is recreated on every render.
Consider memoizing the importer selection:
export function NarrowAlternate({ name, }: { name: keyof typeof WideComponents & keyof typeof NarrowComponents; }) { const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive(); + const importer = useMemo( + () => (isNarrowWidth ? loadNarrow : loadWide), + [isNarrowWidth] + ); return ( <LoadComponent name={name} - importer={isNarrowWidth ? loadNarrow : loadWide} + importer={importer} /> ); }packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-31
: Consider extracting the width threshold as a named constant.The magic number
668
for width threshold could be more maintainable as a named constant, especially since it's crucial for determining the responsive behavior that this PR aims to fix.+const MOBILE_WIDTH_THRESHOLD = 668; + export function SidebarProvider({ children }: SidebarProviderProps) { const [floatingSidebar] = useGlobalPref('floatingSidebar'); const [hidden, setHidden] = useState(true); const { width } = useResponsive(); - const alwaysFloats = width < 668; + const alwaysFloats = width < MOBILE_WIDTH_THRESHOLD;packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (1)
Line range hint
21-44
: Architectural consideration for PWA resize handling.The current implementation should fix the iPad PWA resize issue by properly tracking window size changes. However, consider these additional improvements for robust PWA support:
- Add resize event cleanup in case the component unmounts during a resize
- Consider adding a resize observer for handling split-screen mode changes
- Consider caching the last known layout preference in localStorage for initial render
Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these suggestions?
packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-90
: Architecture Review: Effective solution for iPad PWA resize issue.This implementation effectively addresses the iPad PWA layout issue (#3707) by:
- Removing module caching, allowing components to reload when the viewport changes
- Implementing proper cleanup to prevent memory leaks during rapid resizing
- Maintaining robust error handling for failed loads
The solution is elegant and maintains good separation of concerns - the component handles loading/error states while leaving the actual responsive logic to the
ResponsiveProvider
.Consider adding the following improvements in future iterations:
- Add loading metrics to track component load times
- Implement a pre-loading strategy for commonly used layouts
- Add retry count configuration through props
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2)
Line range hint
73-73
: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the new prop.The addition of the
CarryoverIndicator
prop improves component flexibility. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain its purpose and usage.+ /** Custom component to render the carryover indicator. Defaults to the built-in CarryoverIndicator component. */ CarryoverIndicator?: ComponentType<CarryoverIndicatorProps>;
Line range hint
154-158
: Consider enhancing accessibility for disabled state.While the cursor style change is good, consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility when the component is disabled.
getDefaultClassName = useCallback( (balanceValue: number) => css({ ...getBalanceAmountStyle(balanceValue), overflow: 'hidden', textOverflow: 'ellipsis', textAlign: 'right', ...(!isDisabled && { cursor: 'pointer', }), ':hover': { textDecoration: 'underline' }, + // Add these styles when disabled + ...(isDisabled && { + opacity: 0.6, + userSelect: 'none', + }), }), [getBalanceAmountStyle, isDisabled], ); // In the component render: <div role="button" aria-disabled={isDisabled} className={getDefaultClassName(balanceValue)} >packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (2)
Line range hint
89-98
: Add missing dependencies to useEffect hook.The useEffect hook uses
type
,internal
,sticky
,timeout
, andonRemove
but they're not included in the dependency array. This could lead to stale closure issues.useEffect(() => { if (type === 'error' && internal) { console.error('Internal error:', internal); } if (!sticky) { setTimeout(onRemove, timeout || 6500); } - }, []); + }, [type, internal, sticky, timeout, onRemove]);
Line range hint
106-109
: Add onRemove to useMemo dependencies.The
processedMessage
memo usesonRemove
in thecompileMessage
function but it's not included in the dependency array.const processedMessage = useMemo( () => compileMessage(message, messageActions, setOverlayLoading, onRemove), - [message, messageActions], + [message, messageActions, onRemove], );packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
269-307
: Consider enhancing mobile layout transition.While the component correctly handles mobile layout by returning null when
isNarrowWidth
is true, consider adding a smooth transition between layouts to improve user experience, especially for iPad users switching between views.return isNarrowWidth ? null : ( <View style={{ + transition: 'all 0.3s ease-in-out', flexDirection: 'row', alignItems: 'center', padding: '0 10px 0 15px', height: 36,
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1)
Line range hint
516-524
: Consider extracting shared responsive stylesThe same responsive logic and calculations are duplicated in both CreatePayeeButton and PayeeItem components.
Consider extracting the shared responsive logic into a custom hook or utility:
const useResponsiveStyles = () => { const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive(); return { narrowStyle: isNarrowWidth ? { ...styles.mobileMenuItem, borderRadius: 0, borderTop: `1px solid ${theme.pillBorder}`, } : {}, iconSize: isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8 }; };Then use it in both components:
function CreatePayeeButton({ ... }) { - const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive(); - const narrowStyle = isNarrowWidth - ? { - ...styles.mobileMenuItem, - } - : {}; - const iconSize = isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8; + const { narrowStyle, iconSize } = useResponsiveStyles(); // ... rest of the component } function PayeeItem({ ... }) { - const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive(); - const narrowStyle = isNarrowWidth - ? { - ...styles.mobileMenuItem, - borderRadius: 0, - borderTop: `1px solid ${theme.pillBorder}`, - } - : {}; - const iconSize = isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8; + const { narrowStyle, iconSize } = useResponsiveStyles(); // ... rest of the component }Also applies to: 625-633
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1)
Line range hint
232-242
: Consider improving style merging strategy.The current implementation might lead to style conflicts when merging narrowInputStyle with inputProps.style. Consider using a more robust style merging approach.
- inputProps = { - ...inputProps, - style: { - ...narrowInputStyle, - ...inputProps.style, - }, - }; + inputProps = { + ...inputProps, + style: { + ...(inputProps.style || {}), + ...narrowInputStyle, + ...(inputProps.style?.override || {}), // Allow explicit style overrides + }, + };packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (2)
Line range hint
386-405
: Fix state mutation inside useMemo.The
useMemo
hook contains a state mutation (setDataCheck(false)
), which is against React's principles and can lead to unexpected behavior. State updates should occur in useEffect or event handlers.Consider refactoring to move the state update outside of useMemo:
const getGraphData = useMemo(() => { - // TODO: fix me - state mutations should not happen inside `useMemo` - setDataCheck(false); return createCustomSpreadsheet({ startDate, endDate, interval, categories, conditions, conditionsOp, showEmpty, showOffBudget, showHiddenCategories, showUncategorized, groupBy, balanceTypeOp, payees, accounts, graphType, firstDayOfWeekIdx, - setDataCheck, + onDataCheck: (value) => setDataCheck(value), }); }, [/* ... dependencies ... */]); +useEffect(() => { + setDataCheck(false); +}, [/* ... same dependencies as useMemo ... */]);
Line range hint
4-4
: Address the TODO comment about missing tests.Tests are crucial for ensuring the reliability of the responsive layout functionality, especially given the recent changes to window resize handling.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for:
- Layout switching based on window width
- Sidebar visibility behavior
- Component rendering in different viewport sizes
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/3729.md
is excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (17)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (56)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1)
4-4
: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the restructuring of the
ResponsiveProvider
into its dedicated feature folder. The component's usage ofuseResponsive
for conditional styling should now work correctly with the fixed responsive implementation, addressing the iPad PWA resize issue.Let's verify that this component responds to window resizes correctly:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation since the previous pattern didn't match.
I can now generate the final response as I have sufficient information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation. The code shows that it uses
useWindowSize
hook fromusehooks-ts
which handles window resize events internally, and properly provides responsive context values through React's Context API.Import path change is correct and the responsive implementation is robust
The updated import path for
useResponsive
is correct, and the implementation shows that:
- The ResponsiveProvider properly tracks window size changes using a debounced listener (250ms delay)
- It correctly provides
isNarrowWidth
and other responsive values based on viewport dimensions- The hook usage in ItemHeader.tsx will work as expected with this implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that ItemHeader's responsive behavior is properly integrated # with the new ResponsiveProvider implementation # Test 1: Check if there are any other components in the codebase using similar # responsive patterns that might need testing rg -l "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" # Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider { $$$ }'Length of output: 2546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different patterns to locate the ResponsiveProvider implementation # and its usage of window resize listeners # Look for the ResponsiveProvider component with more flexible pattern ast-grep --pattern 'export const ResponsiveProvider = $_' # Also check for any resize event listeners in the responsive directory rg -A 5 "addEventListener.*resize" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ # Check the actual implementation file to understand the provider cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsxLength of output: 4674
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
7-10
: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The dynamic module loading strategy with separate webpack chunks for narrow and wide components, combined with the removal of module caching, effectively addresses the iPad PWA layout issue (#3707).
Let's verify the webpack chunk configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify webpack chunk naming consistency # Expected: Consistent chunk naming across the codebase # Check for any other component chunks that might need similar treatment rg "webpackChunkName: ['\"].*-components['\"]"
1-4
: LGTM! Import restructuring looks good.The import path change aligns with the module reorganization, and the dynamic import structure is maintained properly.
Let's verify the import structure across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to get a clearer picture of the import structure.
This will help us:
- See all ResponsiveProvider imports with surrounding context
- Identify any potential inconsistencies in import paths
- Understand how the responsive components are being used across the codebase
The previous command had syntax issues and didn't provide enough context. These new commands should give us a better view of the import structure.
Let me try one more time without specifying the file type, as the environment might not have typescript recognition configured.
This should help us verify:
- All ResponsiveProvider imports and their context
- Any components importing from the responsive directory
- The existence and location of ResponsiveProvider files
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now generate the final response:
Import path change is correctly implemented and consistent
The verification shows that:
- All imports of
useResponsive
andResponsiveProvider
consistently use the new path./ResponsiveProvider
or relative paths from their respective locations- The
ResponsiveProvider
component is properly located atpackages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- No instances of outdated or inconsistent import paths were found
- The component is widely used across the codebase (40+ imports) and all of them follow the correct import pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider import consistency # Expected: All imports should use the new path # Check for any remaining old import paths rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" | \ rg -v "from ['\"]./ResponsiveProvider['\"]"Length of output: 394
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all ResponsiveProvider imports with context rg -A 2 -B 2 "ResponsiveProvider" --type typescript # Also check for any files importing from this responsive component directory rg -A 2 -B 2 "from ['\"].*components/responsive['\"]" --type typescriptLength of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all ResponsiveProvider imports and usage rg -A 2 -B 2 "ResponsiveProvider" # Look for any imports from the responsive directory rg -A 2 -B 2 "from ['\"].*components/responsive" # Check all files in the responsive directory to understand the structure find . -type f -name "ResponsiveProvider*" -exec ls -la {} \;Length of output: 27535
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (2)
Line range hint
31-33
: Verify the width threshold for iPad compatibility.Since this PR specifically addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should ensure the width threshold of 668px properly handles iPad screen dimensions in both portrait and landscape orientations.
Would you like me to help create a test case that verifies the responsive behavior across different iPad screen dimensions?
13-13
: LGTM! Import path update is consistent with the module reorganization.The updated import path aligns with moving the ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated 'responsive' feature folder.
Let's verify that all imports are consistently updated across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the imports.
This should help us verify:
- All locations where ResponsiveProvider is imported
- The actual location of the ResponsiveProvider file to confirm the correct import path
Let me try one final verification with a simpler ripgrep command.
This should help us:
- Find all imports of ResponsiveProvider across the codebase
- Verify the actual usage in SidebarProvider.tsx
Import path is correctly updated and consistent across the codebase
Based on the verification results:
- The ResponsiveProvider is correctly located at
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to this location
- The SidebarProvider's import statement matches the new structure and is being used correctly in the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all imports of ResponsiveProvider/useResponsive are using the new path # Test: Search for any remaining old import paths rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx # Test: Verify new import path usage rg "from ['\"].*responsive/ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any ResponsiveProvider imports using ripgrep # Note: Using just -t typescript to cover both .ts and .tsx files rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" -t typescript # Also search for the file itself to understand its location fd ResponsiveProviderLength of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ResponsiveProvider imports without file type restriction rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" # Also check the content of SidebarProvider to verify the import usage cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsxLength of output: 7086
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3)
48-52
: LGTM! Good error handling improvement.The explicit error handling for missing context provider is a good defensive programming practice. The error message is clear and helpful for developers.
3-3
: LGTM! Good choice using debounced window size tracking.The switch to
useWindowSize
with a 250ms debounce is a solid improvement that should help prevent layout thrashing during resize events, especially important for the iPad PWA resize issue.Let's verify if this debounce delay aligns with other resize handlers in the codebase:
Also applies to: 17-19
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the debounce usage in the codebase.
This will help us:
- Understand general debounce patterns in the codebase
- Find direct resize event listeners
- See how useWindowSize is used in other places
The results will help determine if the 250ms debounce in ResponsiveProvider aligns with existing patterns or if we need to suggest adjustments.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the debounce configuration:
The 250ms debounce delay is consistent with codebase patterns
The search results show that:
- The codebase uses debounce in several places with similar delay values:
- Sidebar interactions use 350ms debounce
- Fixed size list scrolling uses 150ms debounce
- Mobile transaction search uses useDebounceCallback
- The
useWindowSize
hook from usehooks-ts is only used in ResponsiveProvider, making this the primary resize handler- The implementation uses the standard debounce package which is properly declared in package.json
The 250ms delay in ResponsiveProvider sits well within the range of other debounce timings in the codebase (150ms-350ms) and is appropriate for window resize events, providing a good balance between responsiveness and performance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other resize-related debounce configurations rg -i "debounce.*resize|resize.*debounce" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any debounce configurations to understand common patterns rg -i "debounce" -A 2 -B 2 # Also search for window resize event listeners rg -i "window\.addEventListener.*resize" -A 2 -B 2 # And check for useWindowSize hook usage rg "useWindowSize" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 12032
22-24
: Consider handling initial window size state.While the debounced window size tracking is good, we should ensure the layout doesn't flicker during the initial render or when the PWA is opened.
Let's check if the
usehooks-ts
library provides initial values:packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1)
11-11
: LGTM! Import path update aligns with the module reorganization.The updated import path for
useResponsive
correctly reflects its new location in the dedicated feature folder.Let's verify the consistency of import paths across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the imports.
Import paths are consistent across the codebase
Based on the search results, all imports of
useResponsive
andResponsiveProvider
are correctly using the new path structure under theresponsive
directory. The imports follow two consistent patterns:
./responsive/ResponsiveProvider
for files in the same directory../responsive/ResponsiveProvider
for files in subdirectoriesNo instances of the old import path were found, confirming that the migration is complete and consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path # Test: Search for any remaining old import paths # Expect: No results, as all imports should use the new path rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx # Test: Verify the new import path is used consistently # Expect: All imports should use './responsive/ResponsiveProvider' rg "from ['\"].*responsive/ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any imports of ResponsiveProvider using ripgrep # without file type restrictions since tsx isn't recognized rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" # Also check for any file that might be importing the hook rg "useResponsive"Length of output: 16147
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
13-19
: Component correctly handles responsive layout changes.The FloatableSidebar component properly utilizes the useResponsive hook to handle layout changes based on window width. This implementation aligns with the PR's objective of fixing the iPad PWA resize issue, as it:
- Correctly responds to width changes through isNarrowWidth
- Handles visibility appropriately for different screen sizes
Let's verify no conflicting responsive implementations exist:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other implementations that might conflict with this responsive behavior # Expected: No conflicting implementations that could override this behavior # Search for other isNarrowWidth usages rg "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" -A 2 # Look for other sidebar responsive implementations ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()'
7-7
: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.The updated import path aligns with the PR's structural changes, moving ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder.
Let's verify the import path is correct:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show extensive usage of
useResponsive
hook across many components, but we need to verify the actual provider's location and exports to ensure the import path is correct. Let's run these targeted searches to find the source file and verify the exports.
Import path is correct and verified
The verification confirms that:
ResponsiveProvider.tsx
exists atpackages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- This is the only file exporting the
useResponsive
hook- The import path
../responsive/ResponsiveProvider
inpackages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx
correctly resolves to this location🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ResponsiveProvider exists at the new location relative to this file # Expected: Find the ResponsiveProvider.tsx/ts file in the responsive folder # Get the ResponsiveProvider file location fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx -p packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ # Verify no other instances exist that might cause conflicts rg -g '!node_modules' -l 'export.*ResponsiveProvider'Length of output: 17238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the ResponsiveProvider location and exports # First, find the ResponsiveProvider file fd ResponsiveProvider # Then check its exports rg -l "export.*useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ # Also check for any other potential useResponsive exports rg -l "export.*useResponsive" -g '!node_modules'Length of output: 376
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import path update is consistent with project restructuring.The updated import path for
useResponsive
aligns with the broader restructuring of moving theResponsiveProvider
to the dedicatedresponsive
feature folder.
Line range hint
24-71
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to conditionally render different layouts and styles. Given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA resize issues, let's verify the responsive implementation:
- Modal height adjusts between
85vh
(narrow) and275px
(wide)- Header with close button only shows in narrow view
- Section label only shows in wide view
- Account autocomplete adjusts its container height accordingly
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate new shell scripts to better verify the responsive behavior implementation.
Let me generate one more script to check the ResponsiveProvider implementation and window resize handling.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Responsive behavior implementation is correctly handled
The responsive implementation in
AccountAutocompleteModal
is properly integrated with the application's responsive system:
- The
useResponsive
hook is correctly imported from the ResponsiveProvider- The ResponsiveProvider uses
useWindowSize
hook with debounce (250ms) to handle window resize events efficiently- The
isNarrowWidth
flag is properly implemented to trigger at widths below the 'small' breakpoint- The modal's responsive behavior matches the requirements:
- Height adjusts between
85vh
(narrow) and275px
(wide)- Header with close button shows only in narrow view
- Section label shows only in wide view
- Container height for autocomplete adjusts accordingly
The implementation is consistent with other modal components in the codebase that use the same responsive pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that useResponsive hook is properly implemented in the new location # and that it correctly handles window resize events # Test 1: Check if useResponsive implementation includes resize event handlers echo "Checking useResponsive implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'useResponsive = () => { $$$ useEffect(() => { $$$ window.$$$resize $$$ }, $$$) $$$ }' # Test 2: Verify that no other components are still using the old import path echo "Checking for outdated import paths..." rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider'" --type ts --type tsx | grep -v "from '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"Length of output: 446
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the responsive implementation more thoroughly # Check for useResponsive hook implementation echo "Searching for useResponsive hook implementation..." rg "useResponsive.*=.*\(" -A 10 # Check for ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Searching for ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg "ResponsiveProvider.*=.*\(" -A 10 # Look for window resize related event listeners echo "Checking resize event listeners..." rg "addEventListener\(['\"]resize" -A 2 # Check for other components using isNarrowWidth echo "Checking isNarrowWidth usage across components..." rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 # Check for responsive-related imports echo "Checking responsive-related imports..." rg "import.*from.*responsive"Length of output: 44038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation and resize handling echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx echo "Checking window resize event listeners..." rg "addEventListener.*resize" -A 5 packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsxLength of output: 1931
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)
14-14
: Verify the new import path.The import path change from
../../ResponsiveProvider
to../responsive/ResponsiveProvider
aligns with the PR's structural changes to improve organization.Let's verify the new path exists and is consistent across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ResponsiveProvider location and import consistency # Test 1: Check if the ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx$ src/components/responsive/ # Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths that might need updating rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]"
Line range hint
29-31
: Validate responsive behavior for iPad PWA resize issue.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control modal dimensions and layout. This is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues during window resize on iPad PWA.Key responsive behaviors:
- Modal height adjusts between
85vh
(narrow) and275px
(wide)- Header with close button only shows in narrow layout
- Manage payees and transfer options visibility depends on width
Let's verify the responsive implementation:
Also applies to: 35-71
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information about the responsive implementation since the previous search didn't find the ResponsiveProvider implementation.
This will help us understand:
- How
isNarrowWidth
is implemented- Any resize-related logic in the modal itself
- Consistency with other modal components
Let's check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how
isNarrowWidth
is determined and verify the resize handling.This will help us understand:
- The implementation of
isNarrowWidth
and its breakpoints- How resize events are handled
- Whether there are tests validating the responsive behavior
Let's check the breakpoints configuration to complete our verification.
This will help us understand:
- The exact breakpoint values used for responsive behavior
- Consistency of breakpoint usage across the application
Based on all the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Responsive implementation is correctly handling iPad PWA resize issues
The implementation is well-structured and consistent:
ResponsiveProvider
usesuseWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce to handle resize events efficiently- Breakpoints are properly defined (small: 512px, medium: 730px, wide: 1100px)
- Modal height behavior is consistent across similar components:
- Uses
90vh
for container in narrow mode- Uses
85vh
for content in narrow mode- Falls back to 275px in wide mode
- The implementation is shared with other autocomplete modals (Account, Category) ensuring consistent behavior
The responsive behavior is properly implemented with:
- Clean breakpoint definitions
- Debounced resize handling
- Consistent modal height patterns
- Shared implementation across similar components
This implementation should effectively handle the iPad PWA resize issues while maintaining a consistent user experience across different viewport sizes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the responsive implementation # Test 1: Check how isNarrowWidth is determined in ResponsiveProvider ast-grep --pattern 'const isNarrowWidth = $_' # Test 2: Look for resize event handlers in ResponsiveProvider rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver' src/components/responsive/Length of output: 3063
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the responsive implementation in the index file cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx # Also check for any resize-related logic in PayeeAutocompleteModal rg -A 5 'resize|useEffect.*width|useResponsive' packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx # Look for other modal components using similar responsive patterns rg -A 3 'isNarrowWidth.*[0-9]+vh' packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/Length of output: 4453
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find and check the ResponsiveProvider implementation rg --type ts --type tsx -l 'ResponsiveProvider' cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Look for any resize-related tests rg -l 'test.*responsive|describe.*responsive' packages/desktop-client/src/Length of output: 1780
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the breakpoints configuration cat packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts # Look for any other components using these breakpoints rg -A 3 'breakpoints\.(small|medium|wide)' packages/desktop-client/src/Length of output: 2355
packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (3)
29-30
: LGTM: Clean state management implementation.The removal of cached state in favor of null initial state is correct. This ensures fresh component loading on every mount, which is crucial for proper layout switching on resize.
62-63
: LGTM: Proper error propagation.The error handling is correctly implemented, throwing a
LazyLoadFailedError
that can be caught by error boundaries higher up in the component tree.
33-59
: Verify cleanup timing in concurrent mode.The unmounting logic is well-implemented, but there's a potential edge case to consider regarding cleanup timing in React's concurrent mode.
Let's verify if there are any concurrent mode specific implementations in the codebase:
Consider wrapping the state updates in a single operation to prevent potential race conditions:
- setError(null); - setComponent(null); + const resetState = () => { + setError(null); + setComponent(null); + }; + resetState();packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)
15-15
: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
Let's verify the consistency of this import path across other files:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the import paths.
This should help us understand:
- How useResponsive is being imported across the codebase
- Where ResponsiveProvider is located and how it's referenced
- Whether the import path change is consistent with other files
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response:
Import path is correctly aligned with codebase patterns
The import path change in
CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx
to'../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'
is consistent with all other imports ofuseResponsive
across the codebase. The search results show that:
- All files under
components/modals/
use the same relative path'../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'
- Other components adjust the import path based on their location relative to the
responsive
directory- There are no instances of the old import path pattern remaining
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path # Expected: All imports should use the '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider' pattern # Search for any remaining old import paths rg "from '\.\./\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" # Search for new import paths to confirm consistency rg "from '\.\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any imports of useResponsive across the codebase rg "import.*useResponsive" -A 1 # Also search for ResponsiveProvider references to understand the module location rg "ResponsiveProvider" --type typescriptLength of output: 9044
Line range hint
28-83
: Verify responsive behavior for iPad PWA.The component's responsive implementation looks correct, using isNarrowWidth to adjust modal height and UI elements. However, given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA layout issues, we should verify that the useResponsive hook properly detects window resize events.
Let's check the ResponsiveProvider implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the responsive behavior implementation.
Let me search for the window size hook implementation since we found a reference to
useWindowSize
in the ResponsiveProvider.
Let me try one final search pattern to locate the window resize handling code.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response since we have found the key responsive implementation details.
Responsive implementation is properly handled for iPad PWA
The responsive implementation in
CategoryAutocompleteModal
is correctly integrated with the app's responsive system:
- The component uses
useResponsive
hook which is properly implemented with a React Context system (ResponsiveContext
)- The ResponsiveProvider handles viewport dimensions through
useWindowSize
and provides viewport info includingisNarrowWidth
- The app includes ResizeObserver polyfill ensuring reliable resize detection across devices
- The modal's responsive behavior (height adjustments and conditional UI elements) is correctly tied to
isNarrowWidth
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider's window resize handling # Expected: Should find window resize event listeners and proper state updates # Search for resize-related code in ResponsiveProvider ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => { $$$ window.addEventListener($_, $_) $$$ })' # Look for specific resize handler implementations rg -A 5 "addEventListener\('resize'"Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first locate the useResponsive hook implementation fd -e ts -e tsx "useResponsive" --exec rg -l "export.*useResponsive" # Then examine its implementation and related files fd -e ts -e tsx "Responsive" --exec rg -A 10 "export.*Responsive" # Also search for window-related resize handlers in any TypeScript/React files rg -t typescript -t tsx "window.*resize" -A 5Length of output: 899
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useWindowSize implementation fd -e ts -e tsx "useWindowSize" --exec rg -A 15 "export.*useWindowSize" # Also look for the breakpoints definition fd -e ts -e tsx "breakpoints" --exec rg -A 5 "export.*breakpoints" # Search for any window resize event listeners in TypeScript files rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescriptLength of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any hooks or components handling window dimensions rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 10 "const \{.*width.*height\}|window\.inner(Width|Height)" # Look for the ResponsiveContext definition and usage rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 5 "ResponsiveContext|createContext.*Responsive" # Search for any resize-related code with different patterns rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 5 "onResize|handleResize|resize"Length of output: 4274
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (2)
12-12
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The updated import path for
useResponsive
is consistent with the project-wide reorganization of the responsive feature into its dedicated folder.
Line range hint
91-120
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to conditionally apply textarea dimensions. Given that this PR addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should verify that this responsive behavior works correctly during window resize events.Let's verify the implementation:
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
102-146
: Verify responsive behavior with iPad PWA.The responsive implementation in the Page component looks correct. It properly switches between mobile and desktop layouts based on
isNarrowWidth
. This should work as expected with the ResponsiveProvider fixes for the iPad PWA resize issue.Consider testing these specific scenarios:
- Initial load on iPad PWA
- Rotation between portrait and landscape
- Window resize in split-screen mode
To ensure robust responsive behavior, consider adding a resize event listener cleanup in the ResponsiveProvider:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if ResponsiveProvider properly cleans up event listeners # Test: Look for cleanup in useEffect ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => { $$$ return () => { $$$ } }, $$$)'
7-7
: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the restructuring of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to its dedicated feature folder.Let's verify that all imports have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can see that all imports of
ResponsiveProvider
have been consistently updated to use the new path./responsive/ResponsiveProvider
. The search results show that there are no remaining instances of the old import path (../ResponsiveProvider
), and all components that use the ResponsiveProvider are now using the new path structure.All imports have been updated correctly
The import path change has been consistently applied across all files that use the ResponsiveProvider or its hooks:
- ThemeSelector.tsx
- PrivacyFilter.tsx
- Notes.tsx
- FinancesApp.tsx
- App.tsx
- Page.tsx
- Titlebar.tsx
- Notifications.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of ResponsiveProvider have been updated # to use the new path structure # Test: Search for any remaining old import paths rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" # Test: Verify new import path usage rg "from '\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"Length of output: 31848
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1)
18-18
: LGTM! Verify responsive behavior after path change.The import path change aligns with the structural improvements. Since this component relies on
useResponsive
for layout decisions (particularly for flex sizing based onisNarrowWidth
), let's verify that the hook continues to work correctly after the path change.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the hook's export and usage pattern.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have verified both the implementation and the exports.
Import path change is correct and hook functionality is intact
The verification confirms that:
- The
useResponsive
hook is properly implemented and exported fromResponsiveProvider.tsx
- The hook is correctly re-exported through the new responsive module's
index.tsx
- The implementation maintains all the necessary responsive functionality (isNarrowWidth, etc.) required by ReportCard.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are consistent and the hook is properly exported # Test 1: Check if all imports are updated to use the new path echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..." rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" # Test 2: Verify the hook is properly exported from the new location echo "Verifying hook export from new location..." ast-grep --pattern 'export { useResponsive }'Length of output: 3137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the ResponsiveProvider and its exports echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx --exec cat {} # Check the new responsive/index.tsx to see if it re-exports the hook echo -e "\nChecking index.tsx exports..." fd -p "responsive/index.tsx" --exec cat {}Length of output: 2626
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (2)
15-15
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the PR's objective of moving the ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
15-15
: Verify responsive behavior for NetWorthGraph tooltips.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control tooltip visibility in NetWorthGraph. Since this PR addresses iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify this responsive behavior works correctly.Let's check for other components that might have similar tooltip visibility logic:
Also applies to: 39-39, 124-128
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the tooltip implementation in these files to better understand the responsive behavior.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have clear evidence of how tooltips are handled in relation to
isNarrowWidth
.Tooltip behavior in NetWorth components is consistently implemented
The search results show that tooltip visibility is consistently handled across NetWorth-related components:
NetWorth.tsx
:showTooltip={!isNarrowWidth}
NetWorthCard.tsx
:showTooltip={!isEditing && !isNarrowWidth}
GetCardData.tsx
:showTooltip={!isNarrowWidth && showTooltip}
All components correctly disable tooltips on narrow width (mobile/iPad) displays, following the same pattern. The implementation is consistent with the responsive design requirements for iPad PWA resize handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar patterns of tooltip visibility controlled by isNarrowWidth rg -l "showTooltip.*isNarrowWidth" # Search for other uses of isNarrowWidth that might need similar verification ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()'Length of output: 4982
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the tooltip implementation in NetWorth-related components rg -A 5 "showTooltip.*isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx # Look for any tooltip-related props or configurations ast-grep --pattern 'tooltip: { $$$ }' # Check for any mobile-specific tooltip handling rg "tooltip.*mobile|mobile.*tooltip" packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Length of output: 2096
packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (2)
19-19
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature folder restructuring.The updated import path reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.
Line range hint
52-53
: Verify responsive behavior implementation.Given that this PR aims to fix layout issues on iPad PWA during window resize, and this component relies on
useResponsive
hook for layout decisions, we should verify:
- The hook's implementation properly handles window resize events
- The theme color changes work correctly on resize
Let's check the implementation of the responsive hook:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to locate the responsive implementation files and verify the resize handling.
Let me search for the window resize handling implementation in the ResponsiveProvider.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the responsive implementation:
Responsive behavior implementation is properly handled
The responsive implementation in this component is well-managed through the
ResponsiveProvider
which:
- Uses
useWindowSize
hook fromusehooks-ts
library with a 250ms debounce delay to efficiently handle window resize events- Properly calculates viewport breakpoints based on window width:
isNarrowWidth
: < 512pxisSmallWidth
: 512px - 729pxisMediumWidth
: 730px - 1099pxisWideWidth
: >= 1100px- Automatically updates the theme color changes on resize through the context updates
The implementation aligns with the PR's goal to fix iPad PWA layout issues during window resize (as mentioned in release note 3729.md).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider implementation and usage # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation for resize handling echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 10 "useEffect.*resize" "src/components/responsive" # Look for other resize-related handlers that might conflict echo "Checking for other resize handlers..." rg -A 5 "addEventListener.*resize"Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find the responsive-related files echo "Finding responsive-related files..." fd -t f responsive # Then search for useResponsive hook implementation echo "\nSearching for useResponsive implementation..." rg -l "useResponsive" # Look for resize handlers in the entire codebase echo "\nChecking resize handlers in the codebase..." rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver" # Search for responsive context or provider echo "\nSearching for ResponsiveContext or ResponsiveProvider..." rg -A 10 "ResponsiveContext|ResponsiveProvider"Length of output: 69490
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for useWindowSize hook implementation echo "Searching for useWindowSize implementation..." rg -A 10 "useWindowSize" # Look for window resize event listeners echo "\nChecking window resize event listeners..." rg -A 10 "window.*resize|addEventListener.*resize" # Check for breakpoints definition echo "\nChecking breakpoints definition..." rg -A 5 "breakpoints.*=|const breakpoints"Length of output: 3886
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1)
15-15
: LGTM! Import path update is consistent with the restructuring.The updated import path aligns with the PR's structural changes, moving
ResponsiveProvider
to a dedicated feature folder.Let's verify the consistency of this import path across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the import paths.
The previous command failed because the file types weren't properly recognized. This new script:
- Explicitly adds tsx/ts file types to ripgrep
- Searches for both the provider and hook imports
- Verifies the existence of the provider file in the new location
Import path update is correct and consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The ResponsiveProvider file exists at the correct location:
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- All imports of
useResponsive
andResponsiveProvider
consistently use the new path structure from theresponsive
folder- The import path in
GetCardData.tsx
(../../responsive/ResponsiveProvider
) is correct relative to its location in the reports/reports directory🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path # Test: Search for useResponsive imports. Expect: All imports should use the new path structure # Check if there are any old import paths still in use rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider'$" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all imports of useResponsive or ResponsiveProvider rg "import.*ResponsiveProvider|import.*useResponsive" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' # Also check if the ResponsiveProvider file exists in the new location fd "ResponsiveProvider.tsx?" --type fLength of output: 5914
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (2)
16-16
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the restructuring of the
ResponsiveProvider
component to the dedicatedresponsive
feature folder.
16-16
: Verify responsive layout behavior.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control critical layout decisions. Please verify that the layout properly switches between:
- Vertical vs horizontal direction for narrow widths
- Proper alignment of items
- Compact FilterButton appearance on narrow screens
Also applies to: 63-67, 71-75, 156-158
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the responsive layout implementation in the Header component and related files to verify the layout behavior comprehensively.
Based on the comprehensive results, I can now provide a final verification response.
Responsive layout implementation is properly handled ✓
The Header component correctly implements responsive layout behavior with proper handling of:
- Direction switching: Uses
direction={isNarrowWidth ? 'vertical' : 'horizontal'}
for layout orientation- Alignment: Properly aligns items with
alignItems: isNarrowWidth ? 'flex-start' : 'center'
- FilterButton: Implements compact mode with
compact={isNarrowWidth}
The implementation follows consistent patterns seen across other report components (ReportCard, Overview, CashFlow, NetWorth, etc.) and maintains proper responsive behavior throughout the reports section.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of useResponsive hook across the codebase # to ensure all components handle layout changes properly # Test 1: Check if other components in the reports directory also handle responsive layouts echo "Checking responsive handling in reports components:" rg -l "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/" # Test 2: Verify the responsive layout patterns echo -e "\nChecking responsive layout patterns:" rg "isNarrowWidth.*direction|direction.*isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"Length of output: 1171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Header.tsx implementation details echo "Checking Header.tsx implementation:" rg -A 5 -B 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx" # Check FilterButton implementation for narrow screens echo -e "\nChecking FilterButton implementation:" rg -A 5 "FilterButton" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx" # Check alignment properties echo -e "\nChecking alignment properties:" rg "align|justify" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx" # Check other responsive components for consistent patterns echo -e "\nChecking responsive patterns in other report components:" rg -A 3 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/"Length of output: 16286
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (2)
26-26
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.The updated import path for
useResponsive
follows the new feature-based structure, improving code organization.
Line range hint
41-43
: Consider updating MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH on window resize.The
MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH
is calculated only once using the initial window width. If the window is resized to a smaller width, the sidebar could potentially remain wider than desired (wider than 1/3 of the new window width).To verify this potential issue:
Consider moving the MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH calculation inside a useEffect or the resize observer:
- const MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH = width / 3; const MIN_SIDEBAR_WIDTH = 200; + const [maxWidth, setMaxWidth] = useState(width / 3); const [sidebarWidth, setSidebarWidth] = useState( Math.min( - MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH, + maxWidth, Math.max( MIN_SIDEBAR_WIDTH, sidebarWidthLocalPref || DEFAULT_SIDEBAR_WIDTH, ), ), ); const containerRef = useResizeObserver(rect => { + const newMaxWidth = width / 3; + setMaxWidth(newMaxWidth); setSidebarWidth(rect.width); });Also applies to: 47-55
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2)
17-17
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with component restructuring.The updated import path for
useResponsive
reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into the dedicated responsive feature folder.
17-17
: Verify responsive behavior after ResponsiveProvider changes.Since this component relies on
useResponsive
and the PR aims to fix iPad PWA layout issues, ensure that:
- The responsive behavior works correctly after the ResponsiveProvider move
- The
isNarrowWidth
check in the tooltip still functions as expectedAlso applies to: 89-89
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to gather the necessary information.
The previous command failed because the
--type tsx
flag wasn't supported. Let's try without the file type filter and also look at the actual implementation of ResponsiveProvider to understand any potential breaking changes.
Based on the comprehensive results, I can now generate a final response.
No breaking changes found in ResponsiveProvider implementation
The ResponsiveProvider implementation remains consistent and reliable:
- The
isNarrowWidth
property is correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase- The ResponsiveProvider's core functionality of detecting viewport sizes is unchanged
- The hook's API contract is maintained with all expected properties
The component's usage of
useResponsive
andisNarrowWidth
for tooltip behavior is well-aligned with the codebase's responsive patterns, as evidenced by similar usage across multiple components for conditional rendering based on viewport width.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components that might be affected by ResponsiveProvider changes echo "Searching for components using isNarrowWidth..." rg "isNarrowWidth" --type tsx echo "\nChecking for potential breaking changes in ResponsiveProvider usage..." rg "useResponsive|ResponsiveProvider" --type tsxLength of output: 396
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using isNarrowWidth echo "Searching for components using isNarrowWidth..." rg "isNarrowWidth" echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider usage..." rg "useResponsive|ResponsiveProvider" echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx --exec cat {}Length of output: 28951
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (2)
26-26
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural improvements.The updated import path for useResponsive follows the new organization structure, improving code maintainability.
26-26
: Verify responsive behavior in the encryption modal.The modal uses
isNarrowWidth
to adjust input and button dimensions. Since this PR addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should ensure these responsive adjustments work correctly during window resize events.Let's verify the responsive implementation:
Also applies to: 165-167, 182-184
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the responsive implementation.
Let me try one more time with modified commands to check the responsive implementation.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
Responsive behavior in the encryption modal is properly implemented
The implementation shows correct usage of responsive design patterns:
- The
useResponsive
hook is properly imported and used to accessisNarrowWidth
- The responsive adjustments are consistently applied to both input width (100% vs 50%) and height (using
styles.mobileMinHeight
)- The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows proper breakpoint handling with debounced window resize events
- Several other modals in the codebase follow similar responsive patterns using the same hook
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent responsive behavior implementation across modals # Test 1: Check if other modals follow similar responsive patterns rg "isNarrowWidth.*styles\.mobileMinHeight" --type tsx # Test 2: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage in modal components rg "useResponsive.*Modal" --type tsxLength of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for responsive behavior in modal components rg "isNarrowWidth" -t ts -t tsx # Check usage of useResponsive hook in modals rg "useResponsive" -t ts -t tsx # Find all modal components that might need responsive behavior fd -e ts -e tsx . | grep -i "modal"Length of output: 4918
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx cat "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx" # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation cat "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx" # Look for other modal components using useResponsive rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/Length of output: 9658
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (2)
26-26
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to a dedicated feature folder.
Line range hint
156-175
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The conditional rendering of headers based on
isNarrowWidth
looks correct. Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, let's verify that the component properly switches between mobile and desktop headers.✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since I have comprehensive information about the usage of
useResponsive
hook andisNarrowWidth
throughout the codebase.Responsive behavior implementation is correct and consistent
The codebase shows proper implementation of responsive behavior:
- The
useResponsive
hook is consistently imported fromResponsiveProvider
across all components that need responsive behavior- The
isNarrowWidth
flag is properly used in conditional rendering patterns- The component properly handles both mobile and desktop layouts:
- Mobile:
<MobilePageHeader title={title} />
- Desktop:
<PageHeader title={header} />
- The ResponsiveProvider implementation (found in
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
) correctly manages the viewport state and breakpoints- No race conditions or state management issues were found in the header switching logic
The implementation follows the same pattern used successfully across many other components in the codebase, ensuring consistent responsive behavior during window resize.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for proper usage of useResponsive hook and verify no race conditions in header switching # Test 1: Verify useResponsive hook is used consistently echo "Checking useResponsive hook usage patterns..." rg "useResponsive|isNarrowWidth" -A 3 # Test 2: Look for potential race conditions or state management issues echo "Checking for potential state management issues..." ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive(); $$$ return ( $$$ isNarrowWidth ? $$$ );'Length of output: 67300
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (2)
15-15
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider into a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.
15-15
: Verify modal's responsive behavior during window resize.The modal heavily relies on
isNarrowWidth
from useResponsive for its layout decisions. Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, we should verify that the modal correctly adapts its layout when:
- Opening in different viewport sizes
- Resizing the window while the modal is open
- Transitioning between fullscreen modes on iPad
Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:
Also applies to: 41-41, 196-234
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to gather more specific information about the modal's responsive behavior implementation.
This will help us understand:
- How EditFieldModal uses isNarrowWidth for layout decisions
- How ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events
- The breakpoint definitions that determine isNarrowWidth
Let me generate one more script to check the ResponsiveProvider's implementation details since we didn't get its complete implementation in the previous results.
This will help us understand:
- How ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events and breakpoints
- How the Modal component integrates with responsive behavior
Based on the comprehensive results, I can now provide a final response about the modal's responsive behavior verification.
The modal's responsive behavior is properly implemented and handled
The implementation shows a robust responsive system:
- ResponsiveProvider properly handles window resizing through
useWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce- The Modal component has built-in responsive features:
- Adapts to viewport with
maxWidth: '90vw'
andmaxHeight: '90vh'
- Has proper breakpoint handling (
@media (min-width: ${tokens.breakpoint_small})
)- EditFieldModal correctly implements responsive layouts:
- Adjusts container height based on viewport:
height: isNarrowWidth ? '85vh' : 275
- Conditionally renders header components
- Handles input styles differently for narrow widths
The implementation includes all necessary handling for:
- Different viewport sizes
- Window resize events (with debouncing)
- Proper transitions between layouts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the responsive implementation in EditFieldModal and related components # Test 1: Check if there are other modals using similar responsive patterns echo "Checking for other modal components using isNarrowWidth..." rg "isNarrowWidth.*Modal" --type jsx --type tsx # Test 2: Verify consistent responsive handling across modal components echo "Checking responsive handling patterns in modals..." ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()' # Test 3: Look for resize-related event handlers echo "Checking resize event handlers..." rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type jsx --type tsxLength of output: 5209
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the specific responsive implementations in modal components # Check EditFieldModal's responsive layout implementation echo "Checking EditFieldModal's responsive layout..." rg -A 10 "isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 10 "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.* # Check for resize event handling in ResponsiveProvider echo "Checking resize handling in ResponsiveProvider..." rg -A 10 "resize" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.* # Check for window size breakpoints echo "Checking window size breakpoints..." rg "const.*WIDTH" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.*Length of output: 2260
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Checking complete ResponsiveProvider implementation..." cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Check Modal component implementation for resize handling echo "Checking Modal component implementation..." cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/common/Modal.tsxLength of output: 13265
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (3)
26-26
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.The updated import path properly reflects the ResponsiveProvider's new location in the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
111-114
: LGTM: Proper responsive layout handling.The component correctly implements responsive behavior using the useResponsive hook and applies appropriate styles based on the viewport width.
26-26
: Verify all ResponsiveProvider imports are updated.Let's ensure all imports of ResponsiveProvider have been updated consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence about the ResponsiveProvider imports across the codebase.
All ResponsiveProvider imports are correctly updated
All imports of ResponsiveProvider consistently use the new path
./responsive/ResponsiveProvider
across the codebase, and there are no instances of the old import path. The changes are properly synchronized.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old ResponsiveProvider import paths # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" # Test: Verify new import paths are used consistently rg "from '\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"Length of output: 1043
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (2)
39-39
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module reorganization.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the structural improvement of moving responsive-related code to a dedicated feature folder.
39-39
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The Titlebar's visibility is controlled by
isNarrowWidth
from useResponsive, which is critical for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues on iPad PWA. Let's verify the responsive behavior:Also applies to: 269-271
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the responsive behavior. Let me generate the final response:
Responsive behavior verification completed - implementation is correct
The responsive behavior in Titlebar.tsx using
isNarrowWidth
is properly implemented and aligns with the app's responsive design system:
- The Titlebar component correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
to conditionally render (return isNarrowWidth ? null : (...)
), which is consistent with the app's mobile/desktop layout switching pattern- The implementation is part of a broader responsive system where:
ResponsiveProvider
definesisNarrowWidth
based on viewport breakpoints (width < breakpoints.small
)- Multiple components (FinancesApp, Sidebar, Page, etc.) use this flag consistently for layout switching
- The behavior is coordinated with other responsive components, particularly the mobile navigation system
The responsive behavior is working as intended for the iPad PWA layout fixes, as it's integrated into the app's established responsive architecture.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the responsive behavior implementation # Look for other components that might affect the layout switching # Test 1: Check for other isNarrowWidth usages echo "Checking isNarrowWidth usage across components:" rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 # Test 2: Look for related responsive conditions echo "\nChecking other responsive conditions:" rg "useResponsive.*width|width.*useResponsive" -A 2Length of output: 38852
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (3)
33-33
: LGTM: Import path update is correctThe updated import path aligns with the restructuring of the ResponsiveProvider component to its dedicated feature folder.
Line range hint
480-482
: Review layout change handling for mobile breakpointThe layout changes are only processed in desktop mode:
onLayoutChange={ currentBreakpoint === 'desktop' ? onLayoutChange : undefined }This could prevent proper layout updates when switching to mobile view or back. Consider if layout changes should also be handled in mobile mode to ensure smooth transitions between breakpoints.
Let's check the PR context for related changes:
Line range hint
479-483
: Consider separate layouts for mobile and desktop viewsThe current implementation uses the same layout configuration for both mobile and desktop breakpoints:
layouts={{ desktop: layout, mobile: layout }}This might contribute to the iPad PWA layout issues mentioned in issue #3707, as the same layout is reused regardless of the breakpoint. Consider maintaining separate layouts optimized for each viewport size.
Let's verify if this is a common pattern in the codebase:
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (2)
34-34
: LGTM: Import path updated correctlyThe import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
516-524
: LGTM: Responsive behavior implementationThe component correctly implements responsive behavior using the useResponsive hook. The dynamic styles will update appropriately when the window is resized, addressing the iPad PWA layout issues mentioned in the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 625-633
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (2)
25-25
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the restructuring of ResponsiveProvider into the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
232-242
: LGTM: Responsive styles implementation.The useResponsive hook is correctly used to apply mobile-specific styles based on the window width, which directly addresses the layout issues mentioned in the PR objectives.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (2)
36-36
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for
useResponsive
has been updated to match the new location in theresponsive
feature folder, aligning with the PR's structural changes.
Line range hint
91-91
: LGTM: Responsive layout implementation is correct.The component correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
from theuseResponsive
hook to:
- Switch between mobile and desktop headers
- Control sidebar visibility
- Maintain consistent layout behavior
This implementation aligns with the PR's objective of fixing layout issues during window resize.
Also applies to: 476-484, 506-508
|
||
import { breakpoints } from './tokens'; | ||
import { breakpoints } from '../../tokens'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making breakpoints path more maintainable.
The relative import path ../../tokens
could be fragile if the file structure changes.
Consider using a path alias or barrel exports:
-import { breakpoints } from '../../tokens';
+import { breakpoints } from '@app/tokens';
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
8-11
: Consider adding error handling for dynamic importsThe dynamic imports could benefit from error handling to gracefully handle loading failures, especially important for mobile/PWA environments where network conditions may be unstable.
Consider wrapping the dynamic imports with error handling:
const loadNarrow = () => - import(/* webpackChunkName: "narrow-components" */ './narrow'); + import(/* webpackChunkName: "narrow-components" */ './narrow') + .catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to load narrow component:', error); + // Fallback to wide layout or show error UI + return import('./wide'); + });packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)
Sidebar responsiveness needs adjustment to align with design system breakpoints
The verification reveals a misalignment between the sidebar's custom breakpoint (668px) and the application's design system breakpoints defined in
tokens.ts
:
- The sidebar uses a non-standard breakpoint of 668px for floating behavior
- The design system defines standard breakpoints at 512px (small), 730px (medium), and 1100px (wide)
This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior, especially on iPad PWA:
- The sidebar's 668px breakpoint falls between the small (512px) and medium (730px) breakpoints
- This creates an inconsistent responsive behavior compared to other components using the standard breakpoints
Recommendations:
- Align the sidebar's floating behavior with the standard breakpoint system
- Consider using either
breakpoints.small
(512px) orbreakpoints.medium
(730px) instead of the custom 668px value- Test the sidebar behavior thoroughly at these standard breakpoints
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-32
: Verify sidebar responsiveness after ResponsiveProvider changes.Since this component relies on the width value from useResponsive to determine sidebar behavior (floating vs. fixed), we should verify that the sidebar correctly responds to window resizing on iPad PWA, especially around the 668px breakpoint.
Let's verify the ResponsiveProvider integration:
Based on the shell script results, I can now make an informed assessment about the sidebar responsiveness concern. Let me analyze the key findings:
- The
SidebarProvider.tsx
useswidth < 668
as the breakpoint for floating behavior- The
ResponsiveProvider.tsx
defines several breakpoints and provides width information- The
useResponsive
hook is widely used across the application for responsive behaviors- The width value comes from the ResponsiveProvider's context
Let me verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation to understand how the width value is determined.
Let me check the breakpoints configuration to understand how the 668px breakpoint in SidebarProvider relates to the defined breakpoints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage and related responsive behavior # Check for other width-based breakpoints that might need testing rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' 'width\s*[<=>]' # Look for other components using useResponsive that might be affected ast-grep --pattern 'useResponsive'Length of output: 43155
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsxLength of output: 1627
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check breakpoints configuration cat packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.tsLength of output: 760
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (2)
48-52
: Enhance the error message with troubleshooting hints.While the error handling is good, the message could be more helpful for developers.
- throw new Error('useResponsive must be used within a ResponsiveProvider'); + throw new Error( + 'useResponsive must be used within a ResponsiveProvider. ' + + 'Check if ResponsiveProvider is present in the component tree above this component.' + );
Line range hint
1-52
: Solid architectural solution for the resize issue.The combination of:
- Debounced window size tracking
- Proper context initialization
- Strict type checking
- Clear error boundaries
Creates a robust solution for the iPad PWA layout issue while maintaining good performance through debouncing.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
23-65
: LGTM: Responsive behavior implementation is solid.The component handles responsiveness well:
- Properly unmounts on narrow width views
- Smooth transitions for all transformations
- Consistent animation durations
Consider adding a CSS class for the transition properties to improve maintainability and reusability across similar components.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1)
42-54
: Consider enhancing error handling and documentation.While the retry logic is solid, consider these improvements:
- Add comments explaining the retry configuration (why 5 retries?)
- Consider more specific error handling for different failure scenarios (network, module parsing, etc.)
Example documentation:
promiseRetry( retry => importer() .then(module => { if (!isUnmounted) { setComponent(() => module[name]); } }) .catch(retry), { + // Retry up to 5 times with exponential backoff + // to handle temporary network issues or resource availability retries: 5, }, ).catch(e => { + // Handle permanent failures after all retries are exhausted if (!isUnmounted) { setError(e); } });packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1)
15-15
: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.The updated import path reflects the move of
ResponsiveProvider
to a dedicated feature folder, which improves code organization and maintainability.This architectural change supports better module organization and makes the responsive feature more cohesive by grouping related functionality together.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
165-170
: Consider adding resize-related tests.To prevent future regressions of the iPad PWA layout issue, consider adding tests that verify the component's behavior during window resize events.
Example test scenarios:
- Verify margin calculations when window size changes
- Test conditional rendering of mobile UI elements
- Ensure proper state updates from useResponsive during resize
Would you like me to help generate these test cases?
packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1)
Line range hint
151-189
: Consider adding a resize debug log.Since this PR specifically addresses layout issues on resize, consider adding debug logging for window resize events, similar to the existing visibility change log.
<ResponsiveProvider> + {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' && ( + <EventLogger + events={['resize']} + onEvent={(e) => console.debug('Layout update triggered by', e.type)} + /> + )} <SpreadsheetProvider>packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1)
Line range hint
508-527
: Important touch behavior handling for iPad PWA.The implementation includes crucial WebKit-specific handling for touch events, which is especially important for the iPad PWA. The
role="button"
attribute helps prevent delayed touch responses on WebKit browsers.Consider adding automated tests to verify this behavior:
- Add test cases specifically for iPad/iOS touch interactions
- Verify that touch events trigger immediate responses without delays
- Test the component behavior during window resize events
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/3729.md
is excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (57)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1)
4-4
: LGTM! Import path update aligns with component reorganization.The updated import path reflects the move of
ResponsiveProvider
to a dedicated feature folder, which improves code organization.Let's verify the consistency of this import path across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the imports.
This should help us:
- Find all imports of ResponsiveProvider across the codebase
- Confirm the actual location of the ResponsiveProvider file to verify the correctness of the new import path
Import path is correctly aligned with codebase-wide usage pattern
Based on the search results, I can confidently verify that:
- The ResponsiveProvider is indeed located at
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- All imports across the codebase consistently use relative paths to import from the
responsive/ResponsiveProvider
location- The import path in
ItemHeader.tsx
(../responsive/ResponsiveProvider
) follows the same pattern as other components at the same directory levelThe import path change in the review is correct and consistent with the codebase-wide usage pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of ResponsiveProvider use the new path # Expected: All imports should use the new path pattern '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider' # Search for any remaining old import patterns rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ResponsiveProvider imports using ripgrep without file type filters rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" # Also search for the actual ResponsiveProvider file to verify its location fd ResponsiveProviderLength of output: 5830
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (2)
4-4
: LGTM: Import path correctly updatedThe import path change aligns with the structural reorganization of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
8-28
: Verify dynamic loading behavior on resizeThe code structure looks correct, but given the PR's objective to fix layout switching on iPad PWA resize, we should verify that:
- The LoadComponent properly handles importer prop changes
- The module cache is correctly handled to prevent layout getting stuck
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the resize handling and caching mechanisms.
The previous results show that LoadComponent properly handles component reloading by using a key prop and resetting the component state when the importer changes. However, we need to verify:
- How useResponsive detects width changes
- The full implementation of LoadComponentInner to understand the loading behavior
- The promiseRetry mechanism that might affect module loading
This will help us confirm if the dynamic loading behavior is correctly implemented for iPad PWA resize scenarios.
Let me get the complete ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how width changes are detected and handled.
From the previous results, we can see that:
- LoadComponent properly handles component reloading with key prop and cleanup
- It uses promiseRetry for reliable module loading
- The component state is properly reset when importer changes
We need to verify how ResponsiveProvider detects width changes to ensure it properly triggers re-renders when the iPad PWA is resized.
Let me check the useWindowSize hook implementation since it's crucial for handling resize events.
From the previous results, we can see that:
- ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize with debouncing
- It properly calculates viewport info based on width breakpoints
- The context is properly set up and consumed
We need to verify the useWindowSize implementation to ensure it properly handles resize events with debouncing.
Based on all the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the dynamic loading behavior.
Dynamic loading implementation is correctly handling resize scenarios
The implementation is properly handling iPad PWA resize scenarios through multiple mechanisms:
- The ResponsiveProvider uses
useWindowSize
from usehooks-ts with a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive re-renders- LoadComponent properly resets its state and reloads components when the importer changes, using the key prop
- The dynamic imports are wrapped in promiseRetry for reliable module loading
- The width-based component selection is handled through a clean context-based approach
The code structure ensures that when the viewport width changes:
- The debounced width update triggers a re-render of ResponsiveProvider
- This updates the isNarrowWidth value
- NarrowAlternate receives the new value and switches the importer
- LoadComponent detects the importer change and properly reloads the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify LoadComponent implementation and caching behavior # Check LoadComponent implementation echo "Checking LoadComponent implementation..." rg -A 10 "LoadComponent" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx" # Look for any caching mechanisms echo "Checking for caching mechanisms..." rg -l "cache|memo|useMemo" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx" # Check if there are any resize-related event handlers echo "Checking resize handlers..." rg "resize|ResizeObserver" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/"Length of output: 1361
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check useResponsive hook implementation echo "Checking useResponsive implementation..." rg -A 15 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/" # Check LoadComponentInner's full implementation echo "Checking LoadComponentInner's full implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'function LoadComponentInner($_) { $$$ }' # Check promiseRetry implementation echo "Checking promiseRetry implementation..." rg -A 10 "promiseRetry" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/"Length of output: 5428
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 30 "ResponsiveProvider" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx" # Check if there are any resize event listeners or observers echo "Checking resize listeners..." ast-grep --pattern 'addEventListener($_, "resize", $_)' # Check if there are any media query listeners echo "Checking media query usage..." rg -A 10 "matchMedia|MediaQuery" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/"Length of output: 1584
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check useWindowSize implementation echo "Checking useWindowSize implementation..." rg -A 20 "useWindowSize" "packages/desktop-client/src/" # Check breakpoints definition echo "Checking breakpoints definition..." rg -A 5 "breakpoints = {" "packages/desktop-client/src/" # Check if there are any other resize-related hooks echo "Checking other resize hooks..." rg -A 10 "useEffect.*resize|useLayoutEffect.*resize" "packages/desktop-client/src/"Length of output: 4684
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)
13-13
: LGTM: Import path update is consistent with module restructuring.The updated import path aligns with the PR's objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3)
3-3
: Good choice using useWindowSize with debouncing.The switch to
useWindowSize
from usehooks-ts with debouncing is a good solution for the iPad PWA layout issue, as it prevents excessive re-renders during resize events while ensuring layout updates are properly triggered.
17-19
: LGTM: Improved type safety with explicit undefined handling.The change from
null
toundefined
as the initial context value, along with the explicit type union, better represents the uninitialized state and forces consumers to handle it properly.
22-24
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider making the debounce delay configurable.
While 250ms is a reasonable default, different devices or use cases might benefit from different delays. Consider making this configurable via props.
Let's verify the resize handling performance:
packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (2)
11-11
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into the responsive feature folder.
11-11
: Verify responsive behavior on iPad PWA.Given that this PR addresses layout responsiveness issues on iPad PWA, let's verify that the ThemeSelector's conditional rendering based on
isNarrowWidth
works correctly during window resize events.Also applies to: 21-21, 37-39
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response since I have comprehensive information about the responsive behavior implementation:
ThemeSelector's responsive behavior is properly implemented and consistent with app-wide patterns
The verification shows that:
- The
isNarrowWidth
check in ThemeSelector follows the established responsive pattern used across the app- The ResponsiveProvider implementation properly handles window resize events with a 250ms debounce
- The
isNarrowWidth
condition is consistently defined aswidth < breakpoints.small
throughout the app- The ThemeSelector's conditional rendering (
if (isNarrowWidth) { return null; }
) matches the mobile-first approach used in other components🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of responsive behavior across the codebase # Test 1: Check if there are other components using isNarrowWidth that might need similar verification echo "Checking usage of isNarrowWidth across components:" rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 -B 2 # Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation:" ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 59774
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (2)
7-7
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the structural improvement of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to theresponsive
feature folder.
Line range hint
16-16
: Verify useResponsive hook updates on window resize.Since this PR addresses layout issues on window resize, let's verify that the
useResponsive
hook properly updates theisNarrowWidth
value when the window size changes.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the
useResponsive
hook implementation.This should help us locate and analyze the responsive hook implementation and its window resize handling.
Let me search for the window resize handling implementation in the ResponsiveProvider.
Let me check the breakpoint definitions and the useWindowSize hook implementation from usehooks-ts.
Let me try one more search with corrected syntax:
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
The useResponsive hook properly handles window resize events
The implementation uses the battle-tested
useWindowSize
hook fromusehooks-ts
library (v3.0.1) which:
- Handles window resize events with proper debouncing (250ms)
- Updates the width and height values automatically
- Is properly integrated into the ResponsiveProvider component
The
isNarrowWidth
value is correctly derived from the current window width using the defined breakpoint (512px):isNarrowWidth: width < breakpoints.small // where small = 512px🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of useResponsive hook to ensure it properly handles window resize events # Test: Look for resize event listeners and width calculations in ResponsiveProvider echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation:" ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_) { $$$ window.addEventListener("resize", $_) $$$ }' # Test: Check if there are any resize-related tests echo -e "\nChecking for resize-related tests:" rg -l "resize|window.innerWidth" --glob "*test*"Length of output: 325
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find the useResponsive hook implementation echo "Looking for useResponsive hook implementation:" rg -A 10 "export.+useResponsive" # Also search for ResponsiveProvider or similar context provider echo -e "\nLooking for ResponsiveProvider implementation:" rg -A 15 "ResponsiveProvider|ResponsiveContext" # Let's also check for any width-related calculations echo -e "\nChecking width-related calculations:" rg "isNarrowWidth|innerWidth|window\.innerWidth"Length of output: 96609
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the useWindowSize hook implementation that ResponsiveProvider uses echo "Looking for useWindowSize hook implementation:" rg -A 15 "useWindowSize|function useWindowSize" # Also check for any breakpoint definitions echo -e "\nLooking for breakpoint definitions:" rg "breakpoints.*=|const breakpoints"Length of output: 3902
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the breakpoint definitions in tokens.ts echo "Checking breakpoint definitions:" rg -A 5 "breakpoints.*=.*{" packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts # Check if usehooks-ts is properly imported and available echo -e "\nChecking package.json for usehooks-ts:" rg "usehooks-ts" packages/desktop-client/package.json # Look for any resize event listeners in the codebase echo -e "\nChecking for resize event listeners:" rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the breakpoint definitions in tokens.ts echo "Checking breakpoint definitions:" rg -A 5 "export const breakpoints" packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts # Look for the usehooks-ts useWindowSize implementation echo -e "\nChecking usehooks-ts implementation:" rg -l "useWindowSize.*debounceDelay" # Check for any resize-related code echo -e "\nChecking for resize handlers:" rg "resize|innerWidth" --type typescriptLength of output: 526
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated 'responsive' feature folder, improving code organization.
13-13
: Verify layout switching behavior on iPad PWA.Since this component uses
useResponsive
for conditional rendering and the PR aims to fix layout switching on iPad PWA, please verify:
- Modal height switches between '85vh' and 275px on resize
- Header visibility toggles correctly
- Section label positioning updates appropriately
Let's verify all components using the useResponsive hook for layout switching:
Also applies to: 24-71
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now verify the layout switching behavior in the
AccountAutocompleteModal
component. The code shows consistent responsive behavior with other modal components:
- The modal height switches between '85vh' (narrow/mobile) and 275px (desktop) based on
isNarrowWidth
- Header visibility toggles correctly - header is shown only when
isNarrowWidth
is true- Section label positioning updates appropriately - shown only when
isNarrowWidth
is falseLet me verify the specific implementation:
Based on the implementation details, I can now provide the final verification response:
Layout switching behavior in AccountAutocompleteModal is correctly implemented
The code shows proper responsive behavior for iPad PWA:
- Modal height correctly switches between '85vh' (narrow/mobile) and 275px (desktop) based on
isNarrowWidth
- Header with "Account" title and close button is only shown when
isNarrowWidth
is true (lines 43-58)- Section label is properly positioned and only shown when
isNarrowWidth
is false (lines 60-69)The implementation is consistent with other modal components in the codebase and follows the established responsive design patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all components that depend on useResponsive for layout switching # to ensure consistent behavior across the application. echo "Searching for components using useResponsive hook..." rg -l "useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider" echo "\nSearching for responsive layout conditions..." rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 59665
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full implementation of AccountAutocompleteModal ast-grep --pattern 'export function AccountAutocompleteModal($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 7007
packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (4)
29-30
: LGTM! State management simplification improves code clarity.The removal of the module cache and consolidation of error states into a single
error
state is a good improvement. This change directly addresses the issue mentioned in the PR comments where cached modules were preventing proper layout updates on window resize.
33-59
: LGTM! Proper handling of component unmounting.The addition of unmounting checks prevents memory leaks and race conditions during component loading and retries.
62-63
: LGTM! Clear and informative error handling.The error handling provides good debugging context by including both the component name and the original error.
29-59
: Verify performance impact of removing module cache.While removing the module cache fixes the layout issues, we should verify that this doesn't significantly impact performance, especially for frequently resized windows.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different search patterns and file extensions to gather the necessary information.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about the dynamic imports usage in the codebase.
Removing module cache in LoadComponent is safe and aligned with existing patterns
The removal of module cache in LoadComponent.tsx is actually the correct approach because:
- The component is primarily used for responsive layout components (
responsive/index.tsx
) and lazy-loaded features (reports, background) where re-loading on resize is expected behavior- No other component caching implementations were found in the codebase, indicating this was an isolated caching mechanism
- The performance impact is minimal since:
- Dynamic imports are used sparingly (only 7 files use dynamic imports)
- The
promiseRetry
implementation ensures reliable loading- Components are loaded only when needed (on resize or feature access)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of component caching in the codebase # to ensure consistent approach and identify potential performance implications # Look for similar dynamic import patterns rg -l "import\(.+\)" --type typescript # Look for other cache implementations rg -l "moduleCache|ComponentCache" --type typescriptLength of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for dynamic imports and caching patterns # Using .ts and .tsx extensions explicitly # Look for dynamic imports rg -l "import\(.+\)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Look for cache-related implementations rg -l "moduleCache|ComponentCache" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Search for LoadComponent usage to understand impact rg -l "LoadComponent" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Look for actual implementation of dynamic imports rg "import\(.+\)" -A 5 --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t tsLength of output: 4268
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
29-73
: Verify modal's responsive behavior during window resize.The modal heavily relies on
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to determine its dimensions and UI elements. Given that this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize on iPad PWA, we should ensure this component properly responds to window resize events.Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the responsive behavior implementation.
This will help us understand:
- How useResponsive is implemented and what it considers "narrow width"
- If viewport height usage is consistent across modals
- If there are any specific resize handlers in modal components
Let me check one more thing to understand how the responsive behavior is implemented at the provider level.
This will help us understand how the responsive behavior is managed at the provider level and if there are any dedicated resize-handling utilities.
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response about the modal's responsive behavior during window resize.
The responsive behavior implementation is robust and properly handles window resize events.
The implementation shows:
- The ResponsiveProvider uses
useWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce delay, ensuring efficient handling of window resize events- The modal's dimensions are consistently managed through the
isNarrowWidth
flag:
- Height:
90vh
for narrow width,275px
for wider views- Animation is disabled for non-narrow widths
- Header elements are conditionally rendered based on viewport width
The responsive behavior is well-implemented because:
- The window resize handling is centralized in the ResponsiveProvider
- The viewport breakpoints are consistently applied across all modals
- The debounced resize handler prevents performance issues during continuous resize events
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent responsive handling across modal components # and verify there are no hardcoded dimensions that might interfere with # responsive behavior # Test 1: Check for other modal components using useResponsive # to ensure consistent responsive behavior rg -l "useResponsive.*Modal" # Test 2: Look for potential hardcoded viewport units # that might affect responsive behavior rg -l "vh|vw" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals"Length of output: 1390
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of useResponsive and its usage in modals # to verify consistent responsive behavior # Look for useResponsive implementation rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "export.*useResponsive" -A 10 # Check specific modal implementations for consistency rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "isNarrowWidth.*[0-9]+vh" -B 2 -A 2 # Look for window resize event handlers in modal components rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "useEffect.*resize" -B 2 -A 5 "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/"Length of output: 4613
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how window resize is handled rg -g "*.tsx" "ResponsiveProvider" -B 5 -A 20 # Also check for any resize-related hooks or utilities rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "useWindowSize|useResize" -B 5 -A 10Length of output: 121687
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (2)
12-12
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with project restructuring.The updated import path for
useResponsive
correctly reflects its new location in the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
91-120
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to conditionally apply textarea dimensions. Given the PR's focus on fixing layout issues during window resize, let's verify the responsive behavior.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the responsive behavior verification request. From the shell script results, I can see:
- The codebase uses
@juggle/resize-observer
andresize-observer-polyfill
for handling resize events- The
useResponsive
hook is used in the Notes component to conditionally apply textarea dimensions- However, I need to verify the actual implementation of
useResponsive
hook to ensure it properly updatesisNarrowWidth
on resizeLet me check the implementation:
Based on the shell script results, I can now verify the responsive behavior. The key findings are:
- The
ResponsiveProvider
component properly tracks window dimensions usinguseWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce delay- The
isNarrowWidth
value is derived from comparing window width against defined breakpoints- The Notes component correctly uses this value through
useResponsive
hook to conditionally apply textarea dimensions- The responsive state is managed at the app root level and properly propagated through React context
- The implementation includes proper error handling if the hook is used outside provider context
Let me generate the final response:
Responsive behavior during window resize is properly implemented
The Notes component's responsive behavior is correctly implemented with:
- Proper window resize tracking with debounced updates (250ms)
- Clean responsive state management through React context
- Correct conditional styling based on viewport width
- Appropriate error boundaries for hook usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its usage # Expected results: # 1. Confirm that useResponsive hook properly updates isNarrowWidth on resize # 2. Verify there's no module caching that could prevent layout updates # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider' -A 20 # Look for resize event handlers rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver' # Check for any caching mechanisms rg -A 5 'cache|memoiz|useMemo'Length of output: 156882
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check useResponsive hook implementation rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" # Also check for any ResponsiveProvider component that might manage the responsive state rg -A 10 "ResponsiveProvider"Length of output: 55623
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (2)
7-7
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.The updated import path reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder, improving code organization.
Line range hint
102-146
: Verify responsive layout switching implementation.The Page component correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to determine the layout. However, given the PR's objective to fix layout switching on iPad PWA, let's verify that the hook properly updates on window resize.✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the responsive layout implementation.
Let me generate one more script to check the
useWindowSize
hook implementation since it's crucial for the responsive layout.
Based on the previous search results and the current context, I can now provide a final response:
Responsive layout switching implementation is properly handled
The codebase shows a robust implementation for handling responsive layouts:
- The
ResponsiveProvider
component usesuseWindowSize
hook with a debounced delay of 250ms to handle window size changes- The viewport breakpoints are properly defined and used to determine different view modes (narrow, small, medium, wide)
- The
ResizeObserver
polyfill is properly loaded for broader browser compatibility- There's an upcoming release note (3729.md) specifically mentioning "Fix mobile/desktop views not change when window is resized"
The Page component's usage of
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
is correctly implemented as it:
- Properly switches between mobile and desktop layouts
- Uses the context value that's updated through the window resize handling
- Applies appropriate styling and padding based on the viewport width
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism # Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook includes window resize event listeners echo "Checking resize event listener implementation..." rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver" --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Verify ResponsiveProvider's implementation echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider({ children }) { $$$ }' # Test 3: Look for any resize-related state updates echo "Checking resize-related state updates..." rg -A 5 "useState.*width|setWidth|setNarrowWidth" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 564
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism # Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook includes window resize event listeners echo "Checking resize event listener implementation..." rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver" # Test 2: Find useResponsive hook implementation echo "Finding useResponsive hook implementation..." rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" # Test 3: Look for any resize-related state updates echo "Checking resize-related state updates..." rg -A 5 "useState.*width|setWidth|setNarrowWidth" # Test 4: Find ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Finding ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 15 "export function ResponsiveProvider"Length of output: 14479
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check useWindowSize hook implementation echo "Finding useWindowSize hook implementation..." rg -A 15 "export function useWindowSize" # Check for window event listeners echo "Checking window event listeners..." rg -A 10 "window.addEventListener.*resize"Length of output: 265
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (2)
18-18
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature organization.The import path change for
useResponsive
reflects the proper organization of responsive-related code into a dedicated feature folder.
18-18
: Verify responsive behavior in ReportCard component.This component uses
useResponsive
for layout decisions. Since this PR fixes layout responsiveness issues on iPad PWA, we should verify that the ReportCard component properly responds to window resize events.Let's verify the implementation:
Also applies to: 44-45
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the responsive behavior in the ReportCard component. Let me generate the final response:
ReportCard's responsive implementation is properly handled
The verification shows that:
- The ReportCard component correctly uses the
useResponsive
hook to adapt its layout based on screen size- The responsive logic is properly implemented with the following key aspects:
- Uses
isNarrowWidth
to conditionally adjust the flex sizing:flex: isNarrowWidth ? '1 1' : 'calc(${size * 100}% / 3 - 20px)'
- The ResponsiveProvider is properly set up with resize observation (via ResizeObserver polyfill)
- Recent fixes have been made to handle mobile/desktop view changes during window resizes (ref: upcoming-release-notes/3729.md)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage and implementation # Expected results: # 1. Confirm ResponsiveProvider is properly imported and used # 2. Check for any potential issues in responsive logic implementation # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider' -A 10 # Find all components using useResponsive hook echo "Finding all useResponsive hook usages..." rg "useResponsive" -A 2 # Look for resize-related event handlers echo "Checking resize event handlers..." rg "resize|ResizeObserver" -A 3Length of output: 34475
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (2)
23-23
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the structural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.
23-23
: Verify responsive behavior in the encryption modal.This modal uses
isNarrowWidth
to adjust input width and button heights for mobile layouts. Since this PR addresses layout responsiveness issues, we should ensure these responsive adjustments work correctly during window resizes, especially on iPad PWA.Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:
Also applies to: 142-146, 166-171, 182-187
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the responsive behavior implementation further by checking the actual implementation details.
This will help us verify:
- How
isNarrowWidth
is used in the FixEncryptionKeyModal- Compare it with other modals' implementations
- Understand the ResponsiveProvider's behavior for window resizes
Let me check one final aspect - the ResponsiveProvider's implementation to understand how window resizes are handled.
This will help us understand how the responsive behavior is implemented at its core, particularly for PWA scenarios mentioned in the review comment.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Responsive behavior implementation is consistent and properly handled
The verification shows that:
- The
FixEncryptionKeyModal
correctly implements responsive behavior usingisNarrowWidth
for:
- Input width (100% on narrow screens, 50% otherwise)
- Button heights (using
styles.mobileMinHeight
for narrow screens)- The implementation is consistent with other modals (CreateEncryptionKeyModal, CloseAccountModal)
- The ResponsiveProvider properly handles window resizes through:
- Debounced window size monitoring (250ms delay)
- Clear breakpoint-based width calculations
- Proper context management for responsive states
The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resizes, including iPad PWA, as it's based on a robust window size monitoring system with appropriate debouncing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent responsive styling implementation across modals # Test 1: Check for consistent usage of isNarrowWidth in modal components echo "Checking modal components for consistent responsive implementations..." rg -l "isNarrowWidth.*styles\.mobileMinHeight" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/" # Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider import path update across all files echo "Verifying consistent ResponsiveProvider import paths..." rg -l "from '\.\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"Length of output: 2468
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the responsive styling implementation in FixEncryptionKeyModal echo "Checking FixEncryptionKeyModal responsive implementation..." rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx" # Check other modals for comparison echo -e "\nChecking other modals responsive implementation..." rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx" # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx"Length of output: 7756
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ResponsiveProvider's implementation for resize handling echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 20 "ResponsiveProvider" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx" # Check if there are any specific mobile/iPad PWA related configurations echo -e "\nChecking for PWA specific configurations..." rg -l "isPWA|navigator\.standalone" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"Length of output: 1322
packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (3)
23-23
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to the dedicatedresponsive
feature folder.
Line range hint
168-193
: LGTM: Responsive layout implementation is robust.The component correctly handles layout adjustments based on screen width:
- Appropriate margin calculations for floating sidebar
- Mobile-specific UI elements are conditionally rendered
- Proper spacing with MOBILE_NAV_HEIGHT consideration
Line range hint
165-165
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, let's verify that
useResponsive
hook updatesisNarrowWidth
correctly when the window size changes.✅ Verification successful
Let me try to locate the correct path for the responsive-related files.
Let's examine the ResponsiveProvider implementation since we found its location.
Let me check the implementation of the useWindowSize hook since it's handling the resize functionality.
Responsive behavior during window resize is properly implemented
The implementation is robust and reliable for the following reasons:
- Uses the well-tested
useWindowSize
hook fromusehooks-ts
library (v3.0.1) which handles window resize events- Includes a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive re-renders during resize
- Correctly calculates viewport breakpoints based on the current width
- Properly provides the responsive context through React's Context API
- The fix mentioned in the release notes (3729.md) confirms that resize-related issues have been addressed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook # Expected: The hook should update its value based on window resize events # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$)' ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider # Check for resize event listeners rg -A 5 'resize' ../responsive/ResponsiveProviderLength of output: 273
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find files related to responsive functionality fd -t f responsive # Search for useResponsive hook implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export function useResponsive' # Search for resize event listeners in the codebase rg -A 5 'window.*resize' # Search for ResponsiveProvider component ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider'Length of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of ResponsiveProvider.tsx cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Search for useEffect hooks in ResponsiveProvider ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_)' packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Search for any resize-related logic rg -A 10 'resize|width' packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsxLength of output: 2878
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if useWindowSize is implemented locally fd -t f useWindowSize # Look at the usehooks-ts package in package.json to verify the dependency rg '"usehooks-ts"' packages/desktop-client/package.json # Check for any local overrides of useWindowSize rg -l 'useWindowSize'Length of output: 205
packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (2)
25-25
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
25-25
: Verify responsive behavior on iPad PWA.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control navigation visibility. Since this PR fixes iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify this component properly toggles visibility when resizing.Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:
Also applies to: 191-196
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the responsive behavior implementation in MobileNavTabs.tsx and related components.
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate a final response since I have sufficient information about the responsive implementation.
The responsive behavior implementation is robust and should work correctly on iPad PWA
The implementation shows a well-structured responsive system:
- The ResponsiveProvider uses
useWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce delay, which is appropriate for handling resize events efficiently- The breakpoints are properly defined and imported from tokens
- MobileNavTabs correctly implements the visibility toggle using
isNarrowWidth
with a clean fallback:...(!isNarrowWidth && { display: 'none' })- The component includes proper touch handling with react-spring animations and gesture support, which is essential for iPad interactions
The responsive behavior should work correctly on iPad PWA because:
- The resize detection uses the standard
useWindowSize
hook which is compatible with PWA environments- The breakpoint system is viewport-based and device-agnostic
- The navigation visibility toggle is implemented using standard CSS display properties
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of useResponsive hook and related responsive logic # Test 1: Check if useResponsive is consistently imported from the new path echo "Verifying consistent import paths for useResponsive:" rg "import.*useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider" # Test 2: Look for other components using isNarrowWidth for visibility echo "\nChecking usage of isNarrowWidth for visibility toggling:" rg "isNarrowWidth.*display.*none" # Test 3: Find related responsive layout logic echo "\nChecking for other responsive layout implementations:" rg "useResponsive.*isNarrowWidth"Length of output: 5884
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation details of MobileNavTabs and ResponsiveProvider # Look at the MobileNavTabs implementation echo "MobileNavTabs implementation:" cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation echo -e "\nResponsiveProvider implementation:" cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Find other components that might affect mobile/tablet navigation echo -e "\nChecking related mobile navigation components:" rg -l "MobileNavTabs|isNarrowWidth.*nav" --type tsx --type jsx # Look for resize handlers and width breakpoints echo -e "\nChecking resize-related logic:" rg "useEffect.*resize|addEventListener.*resize" --type tsx --type jsxLength of output: 8309
packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (2)
42-42
: LGTM! Clean architectural improvement.The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving
ResponsiveProvider
to a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.
Line range hint
151-189
: Verify ResponsiveProvider's position in component tree.The
ResponsiveProvider
is correctly positioned high in the component tree, wrapping most of the application. This placement is crucial for the layout switching functionality that this PR aims to fix. However, let's verify that no other providers need access to responsive context.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify this concern by searching for both the provider and hook usage patterns in the codebase.
This should help us understand:
- Where ResponsiveProvider is used and its position in component trees
- Which components consume the responsive context through the hook
- The context's definition to understand its default value and shape
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the ResponsiveProvider's position in the component tree.
ResponsiveProvider's position is correctly placed and no changes are needed
Looking at the usage patterns:
Components above ResponsiveProvider in the tree (BrowserRouter, ExposeNavigate, HotkeysProvider) do not use the useResponsive hook, confirming they don't need access to responsive context.
All components that use useResponsive hook are rendered as children of ResponsiveProvider, including:
- Layout components (Page, Sidebar, etc.)
- Feature components (FinancesApp, ManagementApp, etc.)
- UI components (modals, autocomplete, etc.)
The provider's placement in App.tsx strikes the right balance - high enough to provide responsive context to the entire application while being below routing and hotkey functionality that don't need this context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if any components above ResponsiveProvider in the tree need responsive context # by looking for useResponsive hook usage in those components echo "Checking for useResponsive usage in components that might render above ResponsiveProvider..." # Search for useResponsive hook usage in potential parent components rg "useResponsive" --type typescript \ $(fd -e tsx -e ts "HotkeysProvider|BrowserRouter|ExposeNavigate")Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ResponsiveProvider usage and useResponsive hook usage echo "Searching for ResponsiveProvider usage..." rg "ResponsiveProvider" -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nSearching for useResponsive hook usage..." rg "useResponsive" echo -e "\nSearching for responsive context definition..." ast-grep --pattern 'const ResponsiveContext = createContext'Length of output: 40953
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (3)
17-17
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature organization.The updated import path for
useResponsive
follows the new structure where responsive-related features are grouped in theresponsive
folder.
Line range hint
74-74
: LGTM: Well-implemented component customization.The new
CarryoverIndicator
prop follows React best practices:
- Proper TypeScript typing
- Default implementation preserves existing behavior
- Follows component composition pattern
- Maintains backward compatibility
Also applies to: 89-89, 177-181
Line range hint
166-171
: Verify tooltip behavior during window resize.Since this PR addresses resize-related issues, let's ensure the tooltip's disabled state (controlled by
isNarrowWidth
) updates correctly when resizing the window, especially on iPad PWA.✅ Verification successful
Let me try again with corrected file type flags for ripgrep.
Let me try one more time without file type flags since ripgrep should auto-detect the file types.
Based on the results, I can now generate a final response.
Tooltip resize behavior is properly handled through ResponsiveProvider
The implementation is correct and reliable because:
- ResponsiveProvider uses
useWindowSize
hook with a debounced delay of 250ms, ensuring smooth resize handling- The
isNarrowWidth
state is directly derived from the window width compared to breakpoints- Similar tooltip responsive patterns are consistently used across other components (GetCardData, NetWorth, NetWorthCard)
- The tooltip's disabled state will update automatically through React's state management when window size changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other components that might be affected by similar resize-related tooltip behavior # Test: Look for other components using both useResponsive and Tooltip rg -l "useResponsive.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*useResponsive" --type typescript # Test: Check if there are any resize-related issues mentioned in comments rg -i "resize.*tooltip|tooltip.*resize" --type typescriptLength of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other components that might be affected by similar resize-related tooltip behavior # Look for other components using both useResponsive and Tooltip rg -l "useResponsive.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*useResponsive" -t ts -t tsx # Check if there are any resize-related issues mentioned in comments rg -i "resize.*tooltip|tooltip.*resize" -t ts -t tsx # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation rg -A 10 "export (function|const) ResponsiveProvider" -t ts -t tsx # Look for resize handler in ResponsiveProvider or related files rg "handleResize|window\.addEventListener.*resize" -t ts -t tsxLength of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for responsive behavior implementation # Look for ResponsiveProvider implementation rg -A 10 "export (function|const) ResponsiveProvider" # Look for resize handler in ResponsiveProvider or related files rg "handleResize|window\.addEventListener.*resize" # Look for useResponsive hook implementation rg -A 5 "export function useResponsive" # Look for tooltip usage with responsive conditions rg "isNarrowWidth.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*isNarrowWidth"Length of output: 2478
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (2)
19-19
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.The updated import path for
useResponsive
reflects the move ofResponsiveProvider
to a dedicatedresponsive
feature folder, improving code organization.
Line range hint
165-171
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.Given that this PR addresses layout issues on iPad PWA during window resize, let's verify that
useResponsive
hook properly triggers re-renders ofAccountItem
when the window size changes.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the
useResponsive
hook implementation since it wasn't found in the previous search.
Let me analyze the implementation of
useResponsive
and window resize handling. I'll search for theuseWindowSize
hook implementation since it's used in the ResponsiveProvider.
Let me search for the hook implementation in a different way since it might be in a hooks directory.
Let me search for the window size hook in a different location and check the hooks directory structure.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response. The codebase uses the
useWindowSize
hook from theusehooks-ts
library with proper debouncing (250ms) and the ResponsiveProvider correctly updates viewport information based on window size changes.Window resize handling is properly implemented
The responsive behavior during window resize is correctly implemented because:
- The
useWindowSize
hook fromusehooks-ts
is used, which is a well-tested library for handling window resize events- A 250ms debounce delay is applied to prevent excessive re-renders during resize
- The ResponsiveProvider properly updates viewport information based on breakpoints
- The
isNarrowWidth
value used in AccountItem is derived from this responsive context🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism # Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook is properly subscribing to resize events ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$, [$$$resize$$$])' # Test 2: Check if there's proper cleanup of resize listeners ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$return $$$removeEventListener($$$resize$$$)$$$, [$$$])' # Test 3: Verify ResponsiveProvider's resize handling rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver'Length of output: 9321
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useResponsive hook implementation ast-grep --pattern 'function useResponsive' # Search for any ResponsiveProvider or responsive context rg -A 10 'ResponsiveProvider|ResponsiveContext' # Search for isNarrowWidth usage in AccountItem rg -A 5 'isNarrowWidth' packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsxLength of output: 57427
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useWindowSize hook implementation ast-grep --pattern 'function useWindowSize' # Search for any window resize event listeners rg -A 5 'addEventListener.*resize|window\.resize' # Look for debounce implementation used with resize rg -A 5 'debounceDelay|debounce.*resize'Length of output: 754
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useWindowSize in hooks directory rg -A 15 'useWindowSize' packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ # Search for any resize-related hooks fd . packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ -t f -x rg -l 'resize|window' # Look for any debounce utility implementation rg -A 5 'debounce' packages/desktop-client/src/util/Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all files in hooks directory to see its structure fd . packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ -t f # Search for window size hook in the entire codebase rg -A 15 'export.*useWindowSize' # Check if it's defined in a common utilities file rg -A 10 'useWindowSize' packages/desktop-client/src/util/ packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ packages/desktop-client/src/components/Length of output: 4945
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (2)
15-15
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with restructuring.The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the architectural improvement of moving the ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.
15-15
: Verify responsive behavior in EditFieldModal.The component uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control modal layout and animations. Since this PR fixes layout responsiveness issues, we should verify that the modal correctly adapts to window resizing.Let's check for any other components that might need similar responsive handling:
Also applies to: 39-39, 196-234
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of
useResponsive
in modal components to better understand the responsive behavior. I'll check how it's implemented in the base Modal component and other modals.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response about the responsive behavior in EditFieldModal and related components.
Responsive implementation in EditFieldModal is consistent with other modal components
The responsive handling in EditFieldModal follows the same pattern used across other modal components in the codebase:
- Uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to control modal height (85vh vs 275px)- Adjusts input styles and button heights for mobile
- Shows/hides header components based on screen width
- Handles animations differently for desktop/mobile
The implementation aligns with established patterns seen in:
- AccountAutocompleteModal
- CategoryAutocompleteModal
- PayeeAutocompleteModal
- Other modal components using responsive behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other modal components that might need responsive handling # Look for modal components that might not be using useResponsive # Find modal components echo "=== Modal Components ===" fd -e jsx -e tsx --full-path "Modal.*\.(jsx|tsx)$" # Check usage of useResponsive in these components echo -e "\n=== Components using useResponsive ===" rg -l "useResponsive" $(fd -e jsx -e tsx --full-path "Modal.*\.(jsx|tsx)$")Length of output: 10088
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation of useResponsive in Modal.tsx and EditFieldModal.jsx echo "=== Base Modal Implementation ===" rg -A 10 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/common/Modal.tsx" || echo "No useResponsive in base Modal" echo -e "\n=== EditFieldModal Implementation ===" rg -A 10 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx" echo -e "\n=== Other Modal Responsive Implementations ===" for file in $(rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/*) do echo -e "\n--- $file ---" rg -A 5 "useResponsive|isNarrowWidth" "$file" doneLength of output: 15846
packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (2)
36-36
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The change to import
useResponsive
from the newresponsive
feature folder follows good organization practices and matches the PR's structural improvements.
Line range hint
43-57
: Verify responsive behavior implementation.The
NarrowNotSupported
andWideNotSupported
components appear to handle layout switching correctly. They:
- Watch
isNarrowWidth
changes fromuseResponsive
- Trigger navigation on width changes via
useEffect
- Render appropriate content based on current width
This implementation should properly handle the iPad PWA resize issue, but let's verify the responsive behavior is working as expected.
Also applies to: 59-70
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the responsive behavior implementation more thoroughly.
This will help us verify:
- The core ResponsiveProvider implementation
- Any resize event handlers that might conflict
- Media query usage across the codebase
- Consistent navigation implementation in responsive components
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Responsive behavior implementation is correctly implemented and consistent
The verification confirms that:
- The ResponsiveProvider uses a debounced window size hook (250ms delay) to prevent rapid updates
- The responsive logic is consistently implemented across 40+ components using the
useResponsive
hook- The navigation logic in
NarrowNotSupported
is properly implemented and is the only component using the width-based navigation pattern- Media queries in the codebase are aligned with the breakpoints and don't conflict with the responsive logic
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the responsive implementation across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any module caching logic that might affect ResponsiveProvider echo "Checking for module caching logic..." rg -l "cache.*module" # Test 2: Verify consistent usage of useResponsive hook echo "Verifying useResponsive hook usage..." ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()' # Test 3: Look for other resize-related handlers that might interfere echo "Checking for resize handlers..." rg "addEventListener.*resize"Length of output: 5031
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the complete responsive implementation # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..." rg -A 10 "export function ResponsiveProvider" # Check for any resize event handlers in the responsive components echo "Checking resize handlers in responsive components..." rg -A 5 "useEffect.*resize" # Look for any media query usage that might conflict echo "Checking media query usage..." rg "useMediaQuery|@media" # Verify the navigation logic in narrow/wide components echo "Checking navigation implementation in responsive components..." ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => { if (isNarrowWidth) { navigate($$$) } }, $$$)'Length of output: 3852
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (2)
26-26
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with restructuring.The updated import path for
useResponsive
correctly reflects its new location in the responsive feature folder.Let's verify the consistency of this import path change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the import path changes thoroughly.
This will help us verify:
- All imports are consistently updated to the new path
- The moved ResponsiveProvider file actually exports the useResponsive hook
- No old imports remain in the codebase
Import path changes are consistent and correct
The verification shows that:
- The ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to the new location
- The moved file exports both
ResponsiveProvider
anduseResponsive
hook as expected- No old import paths remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are updated consistently # and that the ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location # Check if ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location fd -t f "ResponsiveProvider.tsx" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive # Find any remaining old imports that need updating rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" packages/desktop-client/src/componentsLength of output: 238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all imports of useResponsive or ResponsiveProvider to ensure consistency rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider" packages/desktop-client/src/components -A 1 # Check the content of ResponsiveProvider in its new location to verify it exports useResponsive cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsxLength of output: 11329
Line range hint
123-125
: Verify responsive layout behavior in Notifications component.The component uses
useResponsive
hook for layout adjustments. This is critical for the PR's objective of fixing iPad PWA resize issues. The responsive styles affect:
- Notification item height on narrow screens
- Container positioning based on screen width
Let's verify there are no caching issues with the responsive layout:
Also applies to: 211-219
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the responsive layout implementation to verify this properly.
This will help us understand:
- Where the responsive hook is defined and used
- How responsive layout is implemented in Notifications
- If there's any memoization that could affect the layout behavior
Let me check the responsive implementation details to fully understand how the layout behavior is handled.
This will help us understand:
- How the responsive hook is implemented
- What styles are affected by responsive changes
- If there are any resize-related handlers that might cause issues
Let me check one final thing about the Notifications component's implementation.
This will help us understand:
- How the Notifications component uses the responsive hook
- What styles are affected by responsive changes
No caching issues found in responsive layout implementation
Based on the code analysis, the responsive layout implementation in the Notifications component is properly handled without any caching concerns:
- The
useResponsive
hook usesuseWindowSize
with a debounce delay of 250ms, which is appropriate for resize events- The responsive styles in Notifications are directly derived from the current responsive state:
- Container positioning is dynamically adjusted based on
isNarrowWidth
- Mobile height adjustments are applied conditionally through
narrowStyle
- The only
useMemo
usage is for message processing, which is unrelated to layout behaviorThe responsive layout will correctly update on iPad PWA resize events as it relies on real-time window dimensions through the ResponsiveProvider.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any module caching logic that might affect responsive behavior # Look for caching-related code that might affect responsive layout rg -A 5 "cache|memo|useMemo.*responsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsiveLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for responsive hook implementation and its usage rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/ # Look for responsive-related code in the Notifications component rg -A 5 "responsive|layout|width|height" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx # Check for any memoization in Notifications component ast-grep --pattern 'useMemo($$$)' packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsxLength of output: 3854
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Look for responsive-related styles in Notifications rg -A 10 "const.*styles.*=.*{" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx # Check for any resize handlers or listeners rg -A 5 "resize|onResize|useEffect.*width" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsxLength of output: 1921
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the Notifications component implementation cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx # Look for any style objects with fixed pattern rg -A 5 "style: ?{" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsxLength of output: 8386
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (2)
32-32
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
32-32
: Verify responsive layout behavior.The component correctly uses
useResponsive
to switch between mobile and desktop layouts. However, given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify that the layout changes properly respond to window resize events.Consider adding a resize event listener test to ensure the component properly updates when the window size changes. This would help prevent regression of the iPad PWA issue being fixed in this PR.
Also applies to: 229-243
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different search patterns to gather more information about the responsive implementation.
These commands should help us understand:
- How resize handling is implemented
- Where the ResponsiveProvider is located
- How widely useResponsive is used
- If there are any window resize event listeners
This will give us better context about the responsive implementation and help verify the review comment's concerns.
Let me check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how resize handling is implemented.
This will help us understand:
- How the ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events
- If ResizeObserver is used for handling resize events
- The implementation details of the responsive layout behavior
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Responsive layout behavior is properly implemented and verified
The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows a robust approach to handling window resize events:
- It uses
useWindowSize
hook with a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive updates- The component correctly handles various breakpoints (narrow, small, medium, wide)
- The resize handling is automatically managed by React hooks, no manual event listeners needed
- The fix mentioned in the release notes (3729.md) confirms that window resize issues have been addressed
Additionally:
- The implementation uses ResizeObserver polyfill for broader browser support
- Multiple components consistently use the
useResponsive
hook to adapt their layouts- The CashFlow component follows the same pattern as other components using this hook
The review comment's concern about resize event handling has been addressed through the existing implementation, and no additional resize event listener tests are necessary as the functionality is handled by the framework-level hooks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for resize event handling in ResponsiveProvider rg -l "resize.*event.*listener" --type typescript # Look for other components using useResponsive to ensure consistent implementation ast-grep --pattern 'import { useResponsive } from "$_"'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for resize-related code in all files rg "resize" -A 3 # Look for ResponsiveProvider implementation fd ResponsiveProvider # Search for useResponsive hook usage rg "useResponsive" # Look for window event listeners rg "addEventListener.*resize|window.*resize"Length of output: 14483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the ResponsiveProvider implementation cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Look for ResizeObserver usage rg "ResizeObserver" -A 3Length of output: 5330
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (2)
39-39
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
39-39
: Verify responsive behavior after module cache removal.The Titlebar component's visibility depends on
isNarrowWidth
from useResponsive hook. Since the PR removes module caching to fix layout responsiveness, we should verify that the Titlebar correctly shows/hides when resizing the window, especially on iPad PWA.Let's verify the component's dependencies:
Also applies to: 269-273
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation and its usage in Titlebar to better understand the responsive behavior.
This will help us understand:
- How the useResponsive hook is implemented
- How Titlebar uses the isNarrowWidth flag
- Any recent changes to ResponsiveProvider that might affect caching
Let me check one more thing to understand the window size hook implementation since it's crucial for the responsive behavior.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Titlebar's responsive behavior has been improved with debounced window resizing
The recent changes to ResponsiveProvider show that window resize handling has been enhanced with debouncing (changed from 100ms to 250ms), which should improve the Titlebar's show/hide behavior. The component correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
for conditional rendering, and the changes appear to be a deliberate improvement rather than a regression:
- Titlebar returns
null
whenisNarrowWidth
is true, which is the expected behavior for narrow viewports- ResponsiveProvider now uses debounced window size updates to prevent rapid re-renders during resizing
- The implementation is used consistently across 40+ components, indicating a well-tested responsive system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other components that might be affected by the ResponsiveProvider changes # Test 1: Find all files using useResponsive hook echo "Files using useResponsive hook:" rg -l "useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider" # Test 2: Check for any conditional imports or dynamic loading related to ResponsiveProvider echo -e "\nFiles with dynamic imports near ResponsiveProvider usage:" rg -B 3 -A 3 "React\.lazy.*ResponsiveProvider|import\(.*ResponsiveProvider\)"Length of output: 3037
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ResponsiveProvider implementation and Titlebar usage echo "ResponsiveProvider implementation:" rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx echo -e "\nTitlebar responsive behavior implementation:" rg -A 10 "isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx echo -e "\nCheck for any recent changes to ResponsiveProvider:" git log -p -- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx | head -n 50Length of output: 3483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check useWindowSize implementation echo "useWindowSize implementation:" rg -A 15 "export function useWindowSize" packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/useWindowSize.ts # Check if there are any other components that might affect window size calculations echo -e "\nOther window size related code:" rg -l "useWindowSize|window\.inner(Width|Height)"Length of output: 457
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (2)
34-34
: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.The updated import path for
useResponsive
reflects the reorganization of theResponsiveProvider
into the dedicatedresponsive
feature folder. This change is consistent with the PR's structural improvements.Let's verify that all imports of useResponsive have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the imports properly.
These commands should help us verify:
- All current import paths for ResponsiveProvider
- Usage of useResponsive hook across the codebase
- Files that contain ResponsiveProvider references
This will help ensure the import path change is consistent across the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now provide the final response:
Import path update is consistent across the codebase
The search results confirm that all imports of
useResponsive
andResponsiveProvider
are consistently using the new path structure withresponsive/ResponsiveProvider
. The import inCategoryAutocomplete.tsx
follows the same pattern as all other files in the codebase, and there are no remaining instances of old import paths.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old-style imports of ResponsiveProvider # Expected: No matches for old import path rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ResponsiveProvider imports across all files rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" # Also search for useResponsive usage to ensure consistency rg "useResponsive" # Find all TypeScript/React files that might use ResponsiveProvider fd "\.(ts|tsx)$" | xargs grep -l "ResponsiveProvider"Length of output: 18823
Line range hint
516-524
: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.The component correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
to apply mobile-specific styles. This is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout changes during window resize.Please ensure testing covers:
- Initial layout detection on app load
- Layout changes when resizing the window
- Proper styling transitions between mobile and desktop views
Let's verify the responsive styling implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the responsive behavior implementation.
This will help us identify files using responsive patterns and mobile-specific styling. Let's analyze the results to verify the implementation consistency.
Let's examine the specific implementation details of the responsive behavior.
This will help us verify if the responsive implementation is consistent with the application's responsive design patterns and if it's properly integrated with the ResponsiveProvider.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final verification of the responsive behavior implementation.
Responsive implementation is correctly integrated and consistent
The implementation shows proper responsive behavior integration:
- The
useResponsive
hook is correctly imported from ResponsiveProvider and used to detect narrow width layouts- The responsive styling is consistently applied using the
isNarrowWidth
flag to conditionally render mobile-specific styles- The mobile styles follow the application's design patterns:
- Uses
styles.mobileMenuItem
for consistent mobile menu styling- Applies appropriate border and border-radius adjustments for mobile view
- The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows proper breakpoint handling and debounced window size tracking
The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resize as:
- Window size changes are debounced (250ms) to prevent excessive re-renders
- Breakpoints are properly defined and managed through the ResponsiveProvider
- Mobile styles are consistently applied across autocomplete components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent responsive styling patterns # Expected: Similar responsive style implementations across components # Look for other components using isNarrowWidth rg "isNarrowWidth.*=.*useResponsive" --type tsx -B 2 -A 2 # Check for similar mobile menu styling patterns rg "styles\.mobileMenuItem" --type tsx -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useResponsive hook usage rg "useResponsive" -l # Then look for specific responsive patterns rg "isNarrowWidth" -l # Search for mobile-specific styles rg "mobileMenuItem|mobileStyling|mobile.*style" -lLength of output: 6422
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx # Look at the actual implementation in CategoryAutocomplete cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx # Check other autocomplete components for consistency cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsxLength of output: 39990
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (2)
34-34
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
466-471
: Verify responsive layout changes work correctly on iPad.The implementation correctly uses
isNarrowWidth
for conditional styling, which is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues on iPad. However, let's verify that the responsive behavior works as expected during window resize.Also applies to: 473-478
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the responsive layout implementation to verify the iPad-specific behavior.
This will help us understand:
- How the useResponsive hook is implemented
- The specific breakpoints used for responsive layouts
- How PayeeAutocomplete component uses the responsive features
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient evidence about the responsive implementation.
Responsive layout implementation is correctly handling iPad widths
The implementation is properly handling responsive layouts through:
- A well-structured
useResponsive
hook that's properly context-based- Consistent breakpoint usage via design tokens (
tokens.breakpoint_small
)- Appropriate conditional styling in PayeeAutocomplete based on
isNarrowWidth
:
- Adjusts menu item styles for mobile/narrow views
- Handles icon sizes responsively (14px vs 8px)
- Applies proper border styling for narrow widths
The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resize on iPad as it:
- Uses standard media queries based on min-width breakpoints
- Relies on React context for responsive state management
- Doesn't depend on device-specific event listeners
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other responsive layout dependencies that might affect the resize behavior # Test 1: Look for any resize event listeners or window size dependencies rg -l "window\.(inner|outer)" || rg -l "addEventListener.*resize" # Test 2: Check for any media query usage that might affect the layout rg -l "@media.*width" # Test 3: Look for any iPad or iOS specific handling rg -i "ipad|ios"Length of output: 3381
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of useResponsive hook and its usage ast-grep --pattern 'export function useResponsive() { $$$ }' # Look for specific media queries related to iPad/tablet widths rg -A 3 "@media.*width.*\{" packages/desktop-client/src/style/styles.ts # Check PayeeAutocomplete's usage of responsive styling rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth|useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsxLength of output: 2079
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (2)
35-35
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for
useResponsive
has been updated to reflect its new location in the dedicatedresponsive
feature folder. This change aligns with the PR's structural improvements.Let's verify that the ResponsiveProvider component exists at the new location and that all imports are consistently updated:
✅ Verification successful
Import path for ResponsiveProvider is correctly updated and consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- The ResponsiveProvider component exists at the expected new location:
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
- All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to import from the new location
- No outdated import paths were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider exists at new location and check for any remaining old imports # Test 1: Check if ResponsiveProvider exists at new location fd "ResponsiveProvider.tsx" "packages/desktop-client/src" # Test 2: Look for any remaining old imports that need updating rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" "packages/desktop-client/src"Length of output: 5905
Line range hint
127-127
: Verify: Responsive layout changes look good.The
useResponsive
hook is correctly used to switch between mobile and desktop layouts. TheisNarrowWidth
flag appropriately determines:
- Whether to show
MobilePageHeader
orPageHeader
- The compact state of the
FilterButton
This implementation should properly handle the iPad PWA layout issues when resizing.
Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:
Also applies to: 208-224, 271-272
✅ Verification successful
The search results show extensive and consistent usage of
isNarrowWidth
fromuseResponsive
hook across the codebase. Let me generate one more verification script to check for mobile-specific components:This will help us verify the mobile component usage patterns in the Spending component and across the codebase.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Responsive layout implementation is correctly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The
useResponsive
hook is consistently used across the codebase with the same pattern- The Spending component correctly implements conditional rendering between
MobilePageHeader
andPageHeader
based onisNarrowWidth
- The implementation aligns with the established responsive patterns used in other components throughout the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent responsive layout patterns across the codebase # Test 1: Look for other components using isNarrowWidth to ensure consistent responsive patterns rg "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" -A 3 "packages/desktop-client/src" # Test 2: Check for any mobile-specific components to ensure they're used with responsive conditions rg "Mobile.*" --type tsx "packages/desktop-client/src"Length of output: 16270
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for mobile-specific components and their usage patterns rg "Mobile.*" "packages/desktop-client/src" --type typescript --type typescriptreact -l # Look specifically at the conditional rendering patterns in the Spending component rg "MobilePageHeader|PageHeader" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx" -A 2Length of output: 884
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (3)
25-25
: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path change aligns with the restructuring of ResponsiveProvider into the responsive feature folder.
Line range hint
258-269
: LGTM: Responsive behavior implemented correctly.The component properly handles responsive layout changes by:
- Using useResponsive hook to detect viewport width
- Applying mobile-specific styles when needed
- Maintaining proper style precedence through spread operator
Line range hint
258-269
: Consider adding cleanup for window resize listeners.While the useResponsive hook correctly handles layout changes, it's important to ensure proper cleanup of any window resize event listeners to prevent memory leaks, especially in components that may be mounted/unmounted frequently.
Let's verify if the useResponsive hook properly handles cleanup:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is brilliant! Code looks fine to me (pending Matiss approving the cache change you highlighted) and it works functionally. This'll make rotating for a desktop feature much nicer.
Closes #3707
Also moved
ResponsiveProvider
to the correctresponsive
feature folder so there are some import path changes but the actual change in isResponsiveProvider
andLoadComponent