Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize #3729

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joel-jeremy
Copy link
Contributor

@joel-jeremy joel-jeremy commented Oct 24, 2024

Closes #3707

Also moved ResponsiveProvider to the correct responsive feature folder so there are some import path changes but the actual change in is ResponsiveProvider and LoadComponent

@actual-github-bot actual-github-bot bot changed the title Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize [WIP] Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e55cfc2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/actualbudget/deploys/671a6aea7aef9e00083f7eb8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3729.demo.actualbudget.org
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Bundle Stats — desktop-client

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
9 5.32 MB → 5.32 MB (+715 B) +0.01%
Changeset
File Δ Size
src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx 🆕 +1.01 kB 0 B → 1.01 kB
node_modules/usehooks-ts/dist/index.js 📈 +892 B (+16.17%) 5.39 kB → 6.26 kB
src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx 📉 -223 B (-12.95%) 1.68 kB → 1.46 kB
src/ResponsiveProvider.tsx 🔥 -991 B (-100%) 991 B → 0 B
View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

Asset File Size % Changed
static/js/index.js 3.33 MB → 3.33 MB (+715 B) +0.02%

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
static/js/indexeddb-main-thread-worker-e59fee74.js 13.5 kB 0%
static/js/resize-observer.js 18.37 kB 0%
static/js/usePreviewTransactions.js 1.64 kB 0%
static/js/BackgroundImage.js 122.29 kB 0%
static/js/AppliedFilters.js 21.3 kB 0%
static/js/narrow.js 82.57 kB 0%
static/js/wide.js 232.12 kB 0%
static/js/ReportRouter.js 1.5 MB 0%

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Bundle Stats — loot-core

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
1 1.27 MB 0%

Changeset

No files were changed

View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
kcab.worker.js 1.27 MB 0%

@joel-jeremy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MatissJanis FYI I had to remove the module cache since it's only caching the first module that is loaded and re-uses that even when the importer prop has changed due to a resize and is now supposed to load a different module

@joel-jeremy joel-jeremy changed the title [WIP] Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize Fix loading of mobile/desktop page on window resize Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a series of changes primarily focused on updating the import paths for the useResponsive hook and the ResponsiveProvider component across multiple files in the desktop client application. The import paths have been modified to reflect a new directory structure, specifically changing from relative paths that pointed to ResponsiveProvider to a more organized structure under the responsive directory. This restructuring aims to improve modularity and clarity within the codebase.

In addition to the import path changes, some components have been enhanced with new props or minor adjustments to their internal logic, such as the addition of clearOnSelect and closeOnBlur props in the autocomplete components. The overall functionality and logic of the components remain largely unchanged, ensuring that existing features continue to operate as intended while accommodating the new import structure.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure responsive layout adjusts based on screen size (Issue #3707)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

:sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • MikesGlitch
  • MatissJanis

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request primarily involves a restructuring of import statements across multiple components in the desktop-client package. The ResponsiveProvider and useResponsive hook have been relocated from various relative paths to a more organized path under ./responsive/ResponsiveProvider. This change is consistent across numerous files, including components like App.tsx, FinancesApp.tsx, and Notifications.tsx, among others.

In addition to the import path updates, some components, such as BalanceWithCarryover, have introduced new optional props while maintaining their existing logic and functionality. Other components, like LoadComponent.tsx, have undergone significant internal logic changes, particularly in error handling and state management. The overall structure and functionality of the components remain intact, ensuring that the application continues to operate as expected. The changes do not affect the signatures of exported entities or introduce new features, focusing instead on improving the organization and clarity of the codebase.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure responsive layout changes on resizing for iPad PWA (#3707) The changes involve restructuring imports but do not explicitly confirm resolution of the layout issue. The impact on responsiveness isn't directly assessed.

Suggested labels

:sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • MikesGlitch
  • youngcw

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 18-29: Consider adding a memoization layer for performance.

The component correctly implements dynamic loading based on width, which fixes the iPad PWA resize issue. However, the importer function is recreated on every render.

Consider memoizing the importer selection:

export function NarrowAlternate({
  name,
}: {
  name: keyof typeof WideComponents & keyof typeof NarrowComponents;
}) {
  const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive();
+ const importer = useMemo(
+   () => (isNarrowWidth ? loadNarrow : loadWide),
+   [isNarrowWidth]
+ );
  return (
    <LoadComponent
      name={name}
-     importer={isNarrowWidth ? loadNarrow : loadWide}
+     importer={importer}
    />
  );
}
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)

Line range hint 31-31: Consider extracting the width threshold as a named constant.

The magic number 668 for width threshold could be more maintainable as a named constant, especially since it's crucial for determining the responsive behavior that this PR aims to fix.

+const MOBILE_WIDTH_THRESHOLD = 668;
+
 export function SidebarProvider({ children }: SidebarProviderProps) {
   const [floatingSidebar] = useGlobalPref('floatingSidebar');
   const [hidden, setHidden] = useState(true);
   const { width } = useResponsive();
-  const alwaysFloats = width < 668;
+  const alwaysFloats = width < MOBILE_WIDTH_THRESHOLD;
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (1)

Line range hint 21-44: Architectural consideration for PWA resize handling.

The current implementation should fix the iPad PWA resize issue by properly tracking window size changes. However, consider these additional improvements for robust PWA support:

  1. Add resize event cleanup in case the component unmounts during a resize
  2. Consider adding a resize observer for handling split-screen mode changes
  3. Consider caching the last known layout preference in localStorage for initial render

Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these suggestions?

packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-90: Architecture Review: Effective solution for iPad PWA resize issue.

This implementation effectively addresses the iPad PWA layout issue (#3707) by:

  1. Removing module caching, allowing components to reload when the viewport changes
  2. Implementing proper cleanup to prevent memory leaks during rapid resizing
  3. Maintaining robust error handling for failed loads

The solution is elegant and maintains good separation of concerns - the component handles loading/error states while leaving the actual responsive logic to the ResponsiveProvider.

Consider adding the following improvements in future iterations:

  1. Add loading metrics to track component load times
  2. Implement a pre-loading strategy for commonly used layouts
  3. Add retry count configuration through props
packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2)

Line range hint 73-73: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the new prop.

The addition of the CarryoverIndicator prop improves component flexibility. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain its purpose and usage.

+ /** Custom component to render the carryover indicator. Defaults to the built-in CarryoverIndicator component. */
  CarryoverIndicator?: ComponentType<CarryoverIndicatorProps>;

Line range hint 154-158: Consider enhancing accessibility for disabled state.

While the cursor style change is good, consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility when the component is disabled.

  getDefaultClassName = useCallback(
    (balanceValue: number) =>
      css({
        ...getBalanceAmountStyle(balanceValue),
        overflow: 'hidden',
        textOverflow: 'ellipsis',
        textAlign: 'right',
        ...(!isDisabled && {
          cursor: 'pointer',
        }),
        ':hover': { textDecoration: 'underline' },
+       // Add these styles when disabled
+       ...(isDisabled && {
+         opacity: 0.6,
+         userSelect: 'none',
+       }),
      }),
    [getBalanceAmountStyle, isDisabled],
  );

// In the component render:
<div
  role="button"
  aria-disabled={isDisabled}
  className={getDefaultClassName(balanceValue)}
>
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (2)

Line range hint 89-98: Add missing dependencies to useEffect hook.

The useEffect hook uses type, internal, sticky, timeout, and onRemove but they're not included in the dependency array. This could lead to stale closure issues.

  useEffect(() => {
    if (type === 'error' && internal) {
      console.error('Internal error:', internal);
    }

    if (!sticky) {
      setTimeout(onRemove, timeout || 6500);
    }
-  }, []);
+  }, [type, internal, sticky, timeout, onRemove]);

Line range hint 106-109: Add onRemove to useMemo dependencies.

The processedMessage memo uses onRemove in the compileMessage function but it's not included in the dependency array.

  const processedMessage = useMemo(
    () => compileMessage(message, messageActions, setOverlayLoading, onRemove),
-    [message, messageActions],
+    [message, messageActions, onRemove],
  );
packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1)

Line range hint 269-307: Consider enhancing mobile layout transition.

While the component correctly handles mobile layout by returning null when isNarrowWidth is true, consider adding a smooth transition between layouts to improve user experience, especially for iPad users switching between views.

 return isNarrowWidth ? null : (
   <View
     style={{
+      transition: 'all 0.3s ease-in-out',
       flexDirection: 'row',
       alignItems: 'center',
       padding: '0 10px 0 15px',
       height: 36,
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1)

Line range hint 516-524: Consider extracting shared responsive styles

The same responsive logic and calculations are duplicated in both CreatePayeeButton and PayeeItem components.

Consider extracting the shared responsive logic into a custom hook or utility:

const useResponsiveStyles = () => {
  const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive();
  return {
    narrowStyle: isNarrowWidth ? {
      ...styles.mobileMenuItem,
      borderRadius: 0,
      borderTop: `1px solid ${theme.pillBorder}`,
    } : {},
    iconSize: isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8
  };
};

Then use it in both components:

function CreatePayeeButton({ ... }) {
-  const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive();
-  const narrowStyle = isNarrowWidth
-    ? {
-        ...styles.mobileMenuItem,
-      }
-    : {};
-  const iconSize = isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8;
+  const { narrowStyle, iconSize } = useResponsiveStyles();
  // ... rest of the component
}

function PayeeItem({ ... }) {
-  const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive();
-  const narrowStyle = isNarrowWidth
-    ? {
-        ...styles.mobileMenuItem,
-        borderRadius: 0,
-        borderTop: `1px solid ${theme.pillBorder}`,
-      }
-    : {};
-  const iconSize = isNarrowWidth ? 14 : 8;
+  const { narrowStyle, iconSize } = useResponsiveStyles();
  // ... rest of the component
}

Also applies to: 625-633

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1)

Line range hint 232-242: Consider improving style merging strategy.

The current implementation might lead to style conflicts when merging narrowInputStyle with inputProps.style. Consider using a more robust style merging approach.

-  inputProps = {
-    ...inputProps,
-    style: {
-      ...narrowInputStyle,
-      ...inputProps.style,
-    },
-  };
+  inputProps = {
+    ...inputProps,
+    style: {
+      ...(inputProps.style || {}),
+      ...narrowInputStyle,
+      ...(inputProps.style?.override || {}), // Allow explicit style overrides
+    },
+  };
packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (2)

Line range hint 386-405: Fix state mutation inside useMemo.

The useMemo hook contains a state mutation (setDataCheck(false)), which is against React's principles and can lead to unexpected behavior. State updates should occur in useEffect or event handlers.

Consider refactoring to move the state update outside of useMemo:

 const getGraphData = useMemo(() => {
-  // TODO: fix me - state mutations should not happen inside `useMemo`
-  setDataCheck(false);
   return createCustomSpreadsheet({
     startDate,
     endDate,
     interval,
     categories,
     conditions,
     conditionsOp,
     showEmpty,
     showOffBudget,
     showHiddenCategories,
     showUncategorized,
     groupBy,
     balanceTypeOp,
     payees,
     accounts,
     graphType,
     firstDayOfWeekIdx,
-    setDataCheck,
+    onDataCheck: (value) => setDataCheck(value),
   });
 }, [/* ... dependencies ... */]);

+useEffect(() => {
+  setDataCheck(false);
+}, [/* ... same dependencies as useMemo ... */]);

Line range hint 4-4: Address the TODO comment about missing tests.

Tests are crucial for ensuring the reliability of the responsive layout functionality, especially given the recent changes to window resize handling.

Would you like me to help generate test cases for:

  1. Layout switching based on window width
  2. Sidebar visibility behavior
  3. Component rendering in different viewport sizes
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c94e38 and e55cfc2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • upcoming-release-notes/3729.md is excluded by !**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (17)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (56)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1)

4-4: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the restructuring of the ResponsiveProvider into its dedicated feature folder. The component's usage of useResponsive for conditional styling should now work correctly with the fixed responsive implementation, addressing the iPad PWA resize issue.

Let's verify that this component responds to window resizes correctly:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation since the previous pattern didn't match.


I can now generate the final response as I have sufficient information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation. The code shows that it uses useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts which handles window resize events internally, and properly provides responsive context values through React's Context API.

Import path change is correct and the responsive implementation is robust

The updated import path for useResponsive is correct, and the implementation shows that:

  • The ResponsiveProvider properly tracks window size changes using a debounced listener (250ms delay)
  • It correctly provides isNarrowWidth and other responsive values based on viewport dimensions
  • The hook usage in ItemHeader.tsx will work as expected with this implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that ItemHeader's responsive behavior is properly integrated
# with the new ResponsiveProvider implementation

# Test 1: Check if there are any other components in the codebase using similar
# responsive patterns that might need testing
rg -l "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" 

# Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider { $$$ }'

Length of output: 2546


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to locate the ResponsiveProvider implementation
# and its usage of window resize listeners

# Look for the ResponsiveProvider component with more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'export const ResponsiveProvider = $_'

# Also check for any resize event listeners in the responsive directory
rg -A 5 "addEventListener.*resize" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/

# Check the actual implementation file to understand the provider
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

Length of output: 4674

packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (2)

Line range hint 7-10: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

The dynamic module loading strategy with separate webpack chunks for narrow and wide components, combined with the removal of module caching, effectively addresses the iPad PWA layout issue (#3707).

Let's verify the webpack chunk configuration:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify webpack chunk naming consistency
# Expected: Consistent chunk naming across the codebase

# Check for any other component chunks that might need similar treatment
rg "webpackChunkName: ['\"].*-components['\"]"

1-4: LGTM! Import restructuring looks good.

The import path change aligns with the module reorganization, and the dynamic import structure is maintained properly.

Let's verify the import structure across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional verification scripts to get a clearer picture of the import structure.

This will help us:

  1. See all ResponsiveProvider imports with surrounding context
  2. Identify any potential inconsistencies in import paths
  3. Understand how the responsive components are being used across the codebase

The previous command had syntax issues and didn't provide enough context. These new commands should give us a better view of the import structure.


Let me try one more time without specifying the file type, as the environment might not have typescript recognition configured.

This should help us verify:

  1. All ResponsiveProvider imports and their context
  2. Any components importing from the responsive directory
  3. The existence and location of ResponsiveProvider files

Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now generate the final response:

Import path change is correctly implemented and consistent

The verification shows that:

  • All imports of useResponsive and ResponsiveProvider consistently use the new path ./ResponsiveProvider or relative paths from their respective locations
  • The ResponsiveProvider component is properly located at packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  • No instances of outdated or inconsistent import paths were found
  • The component is widely used across the codebase (40+ imports) and all of them follow the correct import pattern
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider import consistency
# Expected: All imports should use the new path

# Check for any remaining old import paths
rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" | \
  rg -v "from ['\"]./ResponsiveProvider['\"]"

Length of output: 394


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all ResponsiveProvider imports with context
rg -A 2 -B 2 "ResponsiveProvider" --type typescript

# Also check for any files importing from this responsive component directory
rg -A 2 -B 2 "from ['\"].*components/responsive['\"]" --type typescript

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all ResponsiveProvider imports and usage
rg -A 2 -B 2 "ResponsiveProvider"

# Look for any imports from the responsive directory
rg -A 2 -B 2 "from ['\"].*components/responsive"

# Check all files in the responsive directory to understand the structure
find . -type f -name "ResponsiveProvider*" -exec ls -la {} \;

Length of output: 27535

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (2)

Line range hint 31-33: Verify the width threshold for iPad compatibility.

Since this PR specifically addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should ensure the width threshold of 668px properly handles iPad screen dimensions in both portrait and landscape orientations.

Would you like me to help create a test case that verifies the responsive behavior across different iPad screen dimensions?


13-13: LGTM! Import path update is consistent with the module reorganization.

The updated import path aligns with moving the ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated 'responsive' feature folder.

Let's verify that all imports are consistently updated across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the imports.

This should help us verify:

  1. All locations where ResponsiveProvider is imported
  2. The actual location of the ResponsiveProvider file to confirm the correct import path

Let me try one final verification with a simpler ripgrep command.

This should help us:

  1. Find all imports of ResponsiveProvider across the codebase
  2. Verify the actual usage in SidebarProvider.tsx

Import path is correctly updated and consistent across the codebase

Based on the verification results:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider is correctly located at packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to this location
  3. The SidebarProvider's import statement matches the new structure and is being used correctly in the component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all imports of ResponsiveProvider/useResponsive are using the new path

# Test: Search for any remaining old import paths
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

# Test: Verify new import path usage
rg "from ['\"].*responsive/ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 202


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any ResponsiveProvider imports using ripgrep
# Note: Using just -t typescript to cover both .ts and .tsx files
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" -t typescript

# Also search for the file itself to understand its location
fd ResponsiveProvider

Length of output: 177


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ResponsiveProvider imports without file type restriction
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider"

# Also check the content of SidebarProvider to verify the import usage
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx

Length of output: 7086

packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3)

48-52: LGTM! Good error handling improvement.

The explicit error handling for missing context provider is a good defensive programming practice. The error message is clear and helpful for developers.


3-3: LGTM! Good choice using debounced window size tracking.

The switch to useWindowSize with a 250ms debounce is a solid improvement that should help prevent layout thrashing during resize events, especially important for the iPad PWA resize issue.

Let's verify if this debounce delay aligns with other resize handlers in the codebase:

Also applies to: 17-19

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the debounce usage in the codebase.

This will help us:

  1. Understand general debounce patterns in the codebase
  2. Find direct resize event listeners
  3. See how useWindowSize is used in other places

The results will help determine if the 250ms debounce in ResponsiveProvider aligns with existing patterns or if we need to suggest adjustments.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the debounce configuration:

The 250ms debounce delay is consistent with codebase patterns

The search results show that:

  • The codebase uses debounce in several places with similar delay values:
    • Sidebar interactions use 350ms debounce
    • Fixed size list scrolling uses 150ms debounce
    • Mobile transaction search uses useDebounceCallback
  • The useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts is only used in ResponsiveProvider, making this the primary resize handler
  • The implementation uses the standard debounce package which is properly declared in package.json

The 250ms delay in ResponsiveProvider sits well within the range of other debounce timings in the codebase (150ms-350ms) and is appropriate for window resize events, providing a good balance between responsiveness and performance.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other resize-related debounce configurations
rg -i "debounce.*resize|resize.*debounce" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any debounce configurations to understand common patterns
rg -i "debounce" -A 2 -B 2

# Also search for window resize event listeners
rg -i "window\.addEventListener.*resize" -A 2 -B 2

# And check for useWindowSize hook usage
rg "useWindowSize" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 12032


22-24: Consider handling initial window size state.

While the debounced window size tracking is good, we should ensure the layout doesn't flicker during the initial render or when the PWA is opened.

Let's check if the usehooks-ts library provides initial values:

packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1)

11-11: LGTM! Import path update aligns with the module reorganization.

The updated import path for useResponsive correctly reflects its new location in the dedicated feature folder.

Let's verify the consistency of import paths across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to verify the imports.


Import paths are consistent across the codebase

Based on the search results, all imports of useResponsive and ResponsiveProvider are correctly using the new path structure under the responsive directory. The imports follow two consistent patterns:

  • ./responsive/ResponsiveProvider for files in the same directory
  • ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider for files in subdirectories

No instances of the old import path were found, confirming that the migration is complete and consistent.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path

# Test: Search for any remaining old import paths
# Expect: No results, as all imports should use the new path
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

# Test: Verify the new import path is used consistently
# Expect: All imports should use './responsive/ResponsiveProvider'
rg "from ['\"].*responsive/ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 202


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports of ResponsiveProvider using ripgrep
# without file type restrictions since tsx isn't recognized
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]"

# Also check for any file that might be importing the hook
rg "useResponsive"

Length of output: 16147

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (2)

Line range hint 13-19: Component correctly handles responsive layout changes.

The FloatableSidebar component properly utilizes the useResponsive hook to handle layout changes based on window width. This implementation aligns with the PR's objective of fixing the iPad PWA resize issue, as it:

  1. Correctly responds to width changes through isNarrowWidth
  2. Handles visibility appropriately for different screen sizes

Let's verify no conflicting responsive implementations exist:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other implementations that might conflict with this responsive behavior
# Expected: No conflicting implementations that could override this behavior

# Search for other isNarrowWidth usages
rg "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" -A 2

# Look for other sidebar responsive implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()' 

7-7: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.

The updated import path aligns with the PR's structural changes, moving ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder.

Let's verify the import path is correct:

✅ Verification successful

The previous results show extensive usage of useResponsive hook across many components, but we need to verify the actual provider's location and exports to ensure the import path is correct. Let's run these targeted searches to find the source file and verify the exports.


Import path is correct and verified

The verification confirms that:

  1. ResponsiveProvider.tsx exists at packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. This is the only file exporting the useResponsive hook
  3. The import path ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider in packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx correctly resolves to this location
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ResponsiveProvider exists at the new location relative to this file
# Expected: Find the ResponsiveProvider.tsx/ts file in the responsive folder

# Get the ResponsiveProvider file location
fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx -p packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/

# Verify no other instances exist that might cause conflicts
rg -g '!node_modules' -l 'export.*ResponsiveProvider'

Length of output: 17238


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the ResponsiveProvider location and exports
# First, find the ResponsiveProvider file
fd ResponsiveProvider

# Then check its exports
rg -l "export.*useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/

# Also check for any other potential useResponsive exports
rg -l "export.*useResponsive" -g '!node_modules'

Length of output: 376

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)

13-13: LGTM: Import path update is consistent with project restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive aligns with the broader restructuring of moving the ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 24-71: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to conditionally render different layouts and styles. Given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA resize issues, let's verify the responsive implementation:

  1. Modal height adjusts between 85vh (narrow) and 275px (wide)
  2. Header with close button only shows in narrow view
  3. Section label only shows in wide view
  4. Account autocomplete adjusts its container height accordingly
✅ Verification successful

Let me generate new shell scripts to better verify the responsive behavior implementation.


Let me generate one more script to check the ResponsiveProvider implementation and window resize handling.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Responsive behavior implementation is correctly handled

The responsive implementation in AccountAutocompleteModal is properly integrated with the application's responsive system:

  1. The useResponsive hook is correctly imported from the ResponsiveProvider
  2. The ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize hook with debounce (250ms) to handle window resize events efficiently
  3. The isNarrowWidth flag is properly implemented to trigger at widths below the 'small' breakpoint
  4. The modal's responsive behavior matches the requirements:
    • Height adjusts between 85vh (narrow) and 275px (wide)
    • Header with close button shows only in narrow view
    • Section label shows only in wide view
    • Container height for autocomplete adjusts accordingly

The implementation is consistent with other modal components in the codebase that use the same responsive pattern.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that useResponsive hook is properly implemented in the new location
# and that it correctly handles window resize events

# Test 1: Check if useResponsive implementation includes resize event handlers
echo "Checking useResponsive implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'useResponsive = () => {
  $$$
  useEffect(() => {
    $$$
    window.$$$resize
    $$$
  }, $$$)
  $$$
}'

# Test 2: Verify that no other components are still using the old import path
echo "Checking for outdated import paths..."
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider'" --type ts --type tsx | grep -v "from '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"

Length of output: 446


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the responsive implementation more thoroughly

# Check for useResponsive hook implementation
echo "Searching for useResponsive hook implementation..."
rg "useResponsive.*=.*\(" -A 10

# Check for ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Searching for ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg "ResponsiveProvider.*=.*\(" -A 10

# Look for window resize related event listeners
echo "Checking resize event listeners..."
rg "addEventListener\(['\"]resize" -A 2

# Check for other components using isNarrowWidth
echo "Checking isNarrowWidth usage across components..."
rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2

# Check for responsive-related imports
echo "Checking responsive-related imports..."
rg "import.*from.*responsive" 

Length of output: 44038


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation and resize handling

echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

echo "Checking window resize event listeners..."
rg "addEventListener.*resize" -A 5 packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

Length of output: 1931

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)

14-14: Verify the new import path.

The import path change from ../../ResponsiveProvider to ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider aligns with the PR's structural changes to improve organization.

Let's verify the new path exists and is consistent across the codebase:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ResponsiveProvider location and import consistency

# Test 1: Check if the ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location
fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx$ src/components/responsive/

# Test 2: Check for any remaining old import paths that might need updating
rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]"

Line range hint 29-31: Validate responsive behavior for iPad PWA resize issue.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control modal dimensions and layout. This is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues during window resize on iPad PWA.

Key responsive behaviors:

  1. Modal height adjusts between 85vh (narrow) and 275px (wide)
  2. Header with close button only shows in narrow layout
  3. Manage payees and transfer options visibility depends on width

Let's verify the responsive implementation:

Also applies to: 35-71

✅ Verification successful

Let's gather more information about the responsive implementation since the previous search didn't find the ResponsiveProvider implementation.

This will help us understand:

  1. How isNarrowWidth is implemented
  2. Any resize-related logic in the modal itself
  3. Consistency with other modal components

Let's check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how isNarrowWidth is determined and verify the resize handling.

This will help us understand:

  1. The implementation of isNarrowWidth and its breakpoints
  2. How resize events are handled
  3. Whether there are tests validating the responsive behavior

Let's check the breakpoints configuration to complete our verification.

This will help us understand:

  1. The exact breakpoint values used for responsive behavior
  2. Consistency of breakpoint usage across the application

Based on all the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Responsive implementation is correctly handling iPad PWA resize issues

The implementation is well-structured and consistent:

  1. ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce to handle resize events efficiently
  2. Breakpoints are properly defined (small: 512px, medium: 730px, wide: 1100px)
  3. Modal height behavior is consistent across similar components:
    • Uses 90vh for container in narrow mode
    • Uses 85vh for content in narrow mode
    • Falls back to 275px in wide mode
  4. The implementation is shared with other autocomplete modals (Account, Category) ensuring consistent behavior

The responsive behavior is properly implemented with:

  • Clean breakpoint definitions
  • Debounced resize handling
  • Consistent modal height patterns
  • Shared implementation across similar components

This implementation should effectively handle the iPad PWA resize issues while maintaining a consistent user experience across different viewport sizes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the responsive implementation

# Test 1: Check how isNarrowWidth is determined in ResponsiveProvider
ast-grep --pattern 'const isNarrowWidth = $_'

# Test 2: Look for resize event handlers in ResponsiveProvider
rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver' src/components/responsive/

Length of output: 3063


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the responsive implementation in the index file
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx

# Also check for any resize-related logic in PayeeAutocompleteModal
rg -A 5 'resize|useEffect.*width|useResponsive' packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx

# Look for other modal components using similar responsive patterns
rg -A 3 'isNarrowWidth.*[0-9]+vh' packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/

Length of output: 4453


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find and check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
rg --type ts --type tsx -l 'ResponsiveProvider'
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Look for any resize-related tests
rg -l 'test.*responsive|describe.*responsive' packages/desktop-client/src/

Length of output: 1780


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the breakpoints configuration
cat packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts

# Look for any other components using these breakpoints
rg -A 3 'breakpoints\.(small|medium|wide)' packages/desktop-client/src/

Length of output: 2355

packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (3)

29-30: LGTM: Clean state management implementation.

The removal of cached state in favor of null initial state is correct. This ensures fresh component loading on every mount, which is crucial for proper layout switching on resize.


62-63: LGTM: Proper error propagation.

The error handling is correctly implemented, throwing a LazyLoadFailedError that can be caught by error boundaries higher up in the component tree.


33-59: Verify cleanup timing in concurrent mode.

The unmounting logic is well-implemented, but there's a potential edge case to consider regarding cleanup timing in React's concurrent mode.

Let's verify if there are any concurrent mode specific implementations in the codebase:

Consider wrapping the state updates in a single operation to prevent potential race conditions:

- setError(null);
- setComponent(null);
+ const resetState = () => {
+   setError(null);
+   setComponent(null);
+ };
+ resetState();
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)

15-15: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.

Let's verify the consistency of this import path across other files:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the import paths.

This should help us understand:

  1. How useResponsive is being imported across the codebase
  2. Where ResponsiveProvider is located and how it's referenced
  3. Whether the import path change is consistent with other files

Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response:

Import path is correctly aligned with codebase patterns

The import path change in CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx to '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider' is consistent with all other imports of useResponsive across the codebase. The search results show that:

  • All files under components/modals/ use the same relative path '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'
  • Other components adjust the import path based on their location relative to the responsive directory
  • There are no instances of the old import path pattern remaining
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path
# Expected: All imports should use the '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider' pattern

# Search for any remaining old import paths
rg "from '\.\./\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" 

# Search for new import paths to confirm consistency
rg "from '\.\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"

Length of output: 134


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports of useResponsive across the codebase
rg "import.*useResponsive" -A 1

# Also search for ResponsiveProvider references to understand the module location
rg "ResponsiveProvider" --type typescript

Length of output: 9044


Line range hint 28-83: Verify responsive behavior for iPad PWA.

The component's responsive implementation looks correct, using isNarrowWidth to adjust modal height and UI elements. However, given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA layout issues, we should verify that the useResponsive hook properly detects window resize events.

Let's check the ResponsiveProvider implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the responsive behavior implementation.


Let me search for the window size hook implementation since we found a reference to useWindowSize in the ResponsiveProvider.


Let me try one final search pattern to locate the window resize handling code.


Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response since we have found the key responsive implementation details.

Responsive implementation is properly handled for iPad PWA

The responsive implementation in CategoryAutocompleteModal is correctly integrated with the app's responsive system:

  • The component uses useResponsive hook which is properly implemented with a React Context system (ResponsiveContext)
  • The ResponsiveProvider handles viewport dimensions through useWindowSize and provides viewport info including isNarrowWidth
  • The app includes ResizeObserver polyfill ensuring reliable resize detection across devices
  • The modal's responsive behavior (height adjustments and conditional UI elements) is correctly tied to isNarrowWidth
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider's window resize handling
# Expected: Should find window resize event listeners and proper state updates

# Search for resize-related code in ResponsiveProvider
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => {
  $$$
  window.addEventListener($_, $_)
  $$$
})'

# Look for specific resize handler implementations
rg -A 5 "addEventListener\('resize'"

Length of output: 134


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the useResponsive hook implementation
fd -e ts -e tsx "useResponsive" --exec rg -l "export.*useResponsive"

# Then examine its implementation and related files
fd -e ts -e tsx "Responsive" --exec rg -A 10 "export.*Responsive"

# Also search for window-related resize handlers in any TypeScript/React files
rg -t typescript -t tsx "window.*resize" -A 5

Length of output: 899


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useWindowSize implementation
fd -e ts -e tsx "useWindowSize" --exec rg -A 15 "export.*useWindowSize"

# Also look for the breakpoints definition
fd -e ts -e tsx "breakpoints" --exec rg -A 5 "export.*breakpoints"

# Search for any window resize event listeners in TypeScript files
rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any hooks or components handling window dimensions
rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 10 "const \{.*width.*height\}|window\.inner(Width|Height)"

# Look for the ResponsiveContext definition and usage
rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 5 "ResponsiveContext|createContext.*Responsive"

# Search for any resize-related code with different patterns
rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript -A 5 "onResize|handleResize|resize"

Length of output: 4274

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (2)

12-12: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive is consistent with the project-wide reorganization of the responsive feature into its dedicated folder.


Line range hint 91-120: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to conditionally apply textarea dimensions. Given that this PR addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should verify that this responsive behavior works correctly during window resize events.

Let's verify the implementation:

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (2)

Line range hint 102-146: Verify responsive behavior with iPad PWA.

The responsive implementation in the Page component looks correct. It properly switches between mobile and desktop layouts based on isNarrowWidth. This should work as expected with the ResponsiveProvider fixes for the iPad PWA resize issue.

Consider testing these specific scenarios:

  1. Initial load on iPad PWA
  2. Rotation between portrait and landscape
  3. Window resize in split-screen mode

To ensure robust responsive behavior, consider adding a resize event listener cleanup in the ResponsiveProvider:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if ResponsiveProvider properly cleans up event listeners

# Test: Look for cleanup in useEffect
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => {
  $$$
  return () => {
    $$$
  }
}, $$$)'

7-7: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the restructuring of moving ResponsiveProvider to its dedicated feature folder.

Let's verify that all imports have been updated consistently:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can see that all imports of ResponsiveProvider have been consistently updated to use the new path ./responsive/ResponsiveProvider. The search results show that there are no remaining instances of the old import path (../ResponsiveProvider), and all components that use the ResponsiveProvider are now using the new path structure.

All imports have been updated correctly

The import path change has been consistently applied across all files that use the ResponsiveProvider or its hooks:

  • ThemeSelector.tsx
  • PrivacyFilter.tsx
  • Notes.tsx
  • FinancesApp.tsx
  • App.tsx
  • Page.tsx
  • Titlebar.tsx
  • Notifications.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of ResponsiveProvider have been updated
# to use the new path structure

# Test: Search for any remaining old import paths
rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'"

# Test: Verify new import path usage
rg "from '\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"

Length of output: 31848

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1)

18-18: LGTM! Verify responsive behavior after path change.

The import path change aligns with the structural improvements. Since this component relies on useResponsive for layout decisions (particularly for flex sizing based on isNarrowWidth), let's verify that the hook continues to work correctly after the path change.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the hook's export and usage pattern.


Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have verified both the implementation and the exports.

Import path change is correct and hook functionality is intact

The verification confirms that:

  • The useResponsive hook is properly implemented and exported from ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  • The hook is correctly re-exported through the new responsive module's index.tsx
  • The implementation maintains all the necessary responsive functionality (isNarrowWidth, etc.) required by ReportCard.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are consistent and the hook is properly exported
# Test 1: Check if all imports are updated to use the new path
echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..."
rg -l "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]"

# Test 2: Verify the hook is properly exported from the new location
echo "Verifying hook export from new location..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export { useResponsive }' 

Length of output: 3137


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the ResponsiveProvider and its exports
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx --exec cat {}

# Check the new responsive/index.tsx to see if it re-exports the hook
echo -e "\nChecking index.tsx exports..."
fd -p "responsive/index.tsx" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2626

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (2)

15-15: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the PR's objective of moving the ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


15-15: Verify responsive behavior for NetWorthGraph tooltips.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control tooltip visibility in NetWorthGraph. Since this PR addresses iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify this responsive behavior works correctly.

Let's check for other components that might have similar tooltip visibility logic:

Also applies to: 39-39, 124-128

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the tooltip implementation in these files to better understand the responsive behavior.


Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have clear evidence of how tooltips are handled in relation to isNarrowWidth.

Tooltip behavior in NetWorth components is consistently implemented

The search results show that tooltip visibility is consistently handled across NetWorth-related components:

  • NetWorth.tsx: showTooltip={!isNarrowWidth}
  • NetWorthCard.tsx: showTooltip={!isEditing && !isNarrowWidth}
  • GetCardData.tsx: showTooltip={!isNarrowWidth && showTooltip}

All components correctly disable tooltips on narrow width (mobile/iPad) displays, following the same pattern. The implementation is consistent with the responsive design requirements for iPad PWA resize handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns of tooltip visibility controlled by isNarrowWidth
rg -l "showTooltip.*isNarrowWidth" 

# Search for other uses of isNarrowWidth that might need similar verification
ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()' 

Length of output: 4982


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the tooltip implementation in NetWorth-related components
rg -A 5 "showTooltip.*isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx

# Look for any tooltip-related props or configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'tooltip: {
  $$$
}'

# Check for any mobile-specific tooltip handling
rg "tooltip.*mobile|mobile.*tooltip" packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/

Length of output: 2096

packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (2)

19-19: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature folder restructuring.

The updated import path reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.


Line range hint 52-53: Verify responsive behavior implementation.

Given that this PR aims to fix layout issues on iPad PWA during window resize, and this component relies on useResponsive hook for layout decisions, we should verify:

  1. The hook's implementation properly handles window resize events
  2. The theme color changes work correctly on resize

Let's check the implementation of the responsive hook:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different search strategy to locate the responsive implementation files and verify the resize handling.


Let me search for the window resize handling implementation in the ResponsiveProvider.


Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the responsive implementation:

Responsive behavior implementation is properly handled

The responsive implementation in this component is well-managed through the ResponsiveProvider which:

  1. Uses useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts library with a 250ms debounce delay to efficiently handle window resize events
  2. Properly calculates viewport breakpoints based on window width:
    • isNarrowWidth: < 512px
    • isSmallWidth: 512px - 729px
    • isMediumWidth: 730px - 1099px
    • isWideWidth: >= 1100px
  3. Automatically updates the theme color changes on resize through the context updates

The implementation aligns with the PR's goal to fix iPad PWA layout issues during window resize (as mentioned in release note 3729.md).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider implementation and usage

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation for resize handling
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 10 "useEffect.*resize" "src/components/responsive"

# Look for other resize-related handlers that might conflict
echo "Checking for other resize handlers..."
rg -A 5 "addEventListener.*resize"

Length of output: 345


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the responsive-related files
echo "Finding responsive-related files..."
fd -t f responsive

# Then search for useResponsive hook implementation
echo "\nSearching for useResponsive implementation..."
rg -l "useResponsive"

# Look for resize handlers in the entire codebase
echo "\nChecking resize handlers in the codebase..."
rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver"

# Search for responsive context or provider
echo "\nSearching for ResponsiveContext or ResponsiveProvider..."
rg -A 10 "ResponsiveContext|ResponsiveProvider"

Length of output: 69490


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for useWindowSize hook implementation
echo "Searching for useWindowSize implementation..."
rg -A 10 "useWindowSize"

# Look for window resize event listeners
echo "\nChecking window resize event listeners..."
rg -A 10 "window.*resize|addEventListener.*resize"

# Check for breakpoints definition
echo "\nChecking breakpoints definition..."
rg -A 5 "breakpoints.*=|const breakpoints"

Length of output: 3886

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1)

15-15: LGTM! Import path update is consistent with the restructuring.

The updated import path aligns with the PR's structural changes, moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.

Let's verify the consistency of this import path across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the import paths.

The previous command failed because the file types weren't properly recognized. This new script:

  1. Explicitly adds tsx/ts file types to ripgrep
  2. Searches for both the provider and hook imports
  3. Verifies the existence of the provider file in the new location

Import path update is correct and consistent across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider file exists at the correct location: packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. All imports of useResponsive and ResponsiveProvider consistently use the new path structure from the responsive folder
  3. The import path in GetCardData.tsx (../../responsive/ResponsiveProvider) is correct relative to its location in the reports/reports directory
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are using the new path
# Test: Search for useResponsive imports. Expect: All imports should use the new path structure

# Check if there are any old import paths still in use
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider'$" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all imports of useResponsive or ResponsiveProvider
rg "import.*ResponsiveProvider|import.*useResponsive" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts'

# Also check if the ResponsiveProvider file exists in the new location
fd "ResponsiveProvider.tsx?" --type f

Length of output: 5914

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (2)

16-16: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the restructuring of the ResponsiveProvider component to the dedicated responsive feature folder.


16-16: Verify responsive layout behavior.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control critical layout decisions. Please verify that the layout properly switches between:

  • Vertical vs horizontal direction for narrow widths
  • Proper alignment of items
  • Compact FilterButton appearance on narrow screens

Also applies to: 63-67, 71-75, 156-158

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the responsive layout implementation in the Header component and related files to verify the layout behavior comprehensively.


Based on the comprehensive results, I can now provide a final verification response.

Responsive layout implementation is properly handled

The Header component correctly implements responsive layout behavior with proper handling of:

  • Direction switching: Uses direction={isNarrowWidth ? 'vertical' : 'horizontal'} for layout orientation
  • Alignment: Properly aligns items with alignItems: isNarrowWidth ? 'flex-start' : 'center'
  • FilterButton: Implements compact mode with compact={isNarrowWidth}

The implementation follows consistent patterns seen across other report components (ReportCard, Overview, CashFlow, NetWorth, etc.) and maintains proper responsive behavior throughout the reports section.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of useResponsive hook across the codebase
# to ensure all components handle layout changes properly

# Test 1: Check if other components in the reports directory also handle responsive layouts
echo "Checking responsive handling in reports components:"
rg -l "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/"

# Test 2: Verify the responsive layout patterns
echo -e "\nChecking responsive layout patterns:"
rg "isNarrowWidth.*direction|direction.*isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"

Length of output: 1171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Header.tsx implementation details
echo "Checking Header.tsx implementation:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx"

# Check FilterButton implementation for narrow screens
echo -e "\nChecking FilterButton implementation:"
rg -A 5 "FilterButton" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx"

# Check alignment properties
echo -e "\nChecking alignment properties:"
rg "align|justify" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx"

# Check other responsive components for consistent patterns
echo -e "\nChecking responsive patterns in other report components:"
rg -A 3 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/"

Length of output: 16286

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (2)

26-26: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.

The updated import path for useResponsive follows the new feature-based structure, improving code organization.


Line range hint 41-43: Consider updating MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH on window resize.

The MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH is calculated only once using the initial window width. If the window is resized to a smaller width, the sidebar could potentially remain wider than desired (wider than 1/3 of the new window width).

To verify this potential issue:

Consider moving the MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH calculation inside a useEffect or the resize observer:

-  const MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH = width / 3;
   const MIN_SIDEBAR_WIDTH = 200;
+  const [maxWidth, setMaxWidth] = useState(width / 3);
 
   const [sidebarWidth, setSidebarWidth] = useState(
     Math.min(
-      MAX_SIDEBAR_WIDTH,
+      maxWidth,
       Math.max(
         MIN_SIDEBAR_WIDTH,
         sidebarWidthLocalPref || DEFAULT_SIDEBAR_WIDTH,
       ),
     ),
   );
 
   const containerRef = useResizeObserver(rect => {
+    const newMaxWidth = width / 3;
+    setMaxWidth(newMaxWidth);
     setSidebarWidth(rect.width);
   });

Also applies to: 47-55

packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (2)

17-17: LGTM: Import path update aligns with component restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into the dedicated responsive feature folder.


17-17: Verify responsive behavior after ResponsiveProvider changes.

Since this component relies on useResponsive and the PR aims to fix iPad PWA layout issues, ensure that:

  1. The responsive behavior works correctly after the ResponsiveProvider move
  2. The isNarrowWidth check in the tooltip still functions as expected

Also applies to: 89-89

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to gather the necessary information.

The previous command failed because the --type tsx flag wasn't supported. Let's try without the file type filter and also look at the actual implementation of ResponsiveProvider to understand any potential breaking changes.


Based on the comprehensive results, I can now generate a final response.

No breaking changes found in ResponsiveProvider implementation

The ResponsiveProvider implementation remains consistent and reliable:

  • The isNarrowWidth property is correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase
  • The ResponsiveProvider's core functionality of detecting viewport sizes is unchanged
  • The hook's API contract is maintained with all expected properties

The component's usage of useResponsive and isNarrowWidth for tooltip behavior is well-aligned with the codebase's responsive patterns, as evidenced by similar usage across multiple components for conditional rendering based on viewport width.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by ResponsiveProvider changes
echo "Searching for components using isNarrowWidth..."
rg "isNarrowWidth" --type tsx

echo "\nChecking for potential breaking changes in ResponsiveProvider usage..."
rg "useResponsive|ResponsiveProvider" --type tsx

Length of output: 396


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using isNarrowWidth
echo "Searching for components using isNarrowWidth..."
rg "isNarrowWidth"

echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider usage..."
rg "useResponsive|ResponsiveProvider"

echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
fd ResponsiveProvider.tsx --exec cat {}

Length of output: 28951

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (2)

26-26: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural improvements.

The updated import path for useResponsive follows the new organization structure, improving code maintainability.


26-26: Verify responsive behavior in the encryption modal.

The modal uses isNarrowWidth to adjust input and button dimensions. Since this PR addresses iPad PWA layout issues, we should ensure these responsive adjustments work correctly during window resize events.

Let's verify the responsive implementation:

Also applies to: 165-167, 182-184

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to verify the responsive implementation.


Let me try one more time with modified commands to check the responsive implementation.


Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:

Responsive behavior in the encryption modal is properly implemented

The implementation shows correct usage of responsive design patterns:

  • The useResponsive hook is properly imported and used to access isNarrowWidth
  • The responsive adjustments are consistently applied to both input width (100% vs 50%) and height (using styles.mobileMinHeight)
  • The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows proper breakpoint handling with debounced window resize events
  • Several other modals in the codebase follow similar responsive patterns using the same hook
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent responsive behavior implementation across modals

# Test 1: Check if other modals follow similar responsive patterns
rg "isNarrowWidth.*styles\.mobileMinHeight" --type tsx

# Test 2: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage in modal components
rg "useResponsive.*Modal" --type tsx

Length of output: 151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive behavior in modal components
rg "isNarrowWidth" -t ts -t tsx

# Check usage of useResponsive hook in modals
rg "useResponsive" -t ts -t tsx

# Find all modal components that might need responsive behavior
fd -e ts -e tsx . | grep -i "modal"

Length of output: 4918


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx
cat "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx"

# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
cat "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx"

# Look for other modal components using useResponsive
rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/

Length of output: 9658

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (2)

26-26: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.


Line range hint 156-175: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The conditional rendering of headers based on isNarrowWidth looks correct. Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, let's verify that the component properly switches between mobile and desktop headers.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since I have comprehensive information about the usage of useResponsive hook and isNarrowWidth throughout the codebase.

Responsive behavior implementation is correct and consistent

The codebase shows proper implementation of responsive behavior:

  1. The useResponsive hook is consistently imported from ResponsiveProvider across all components that need responsive behavior
  2. The isNarrowWidth flag is properly used in conditional rendering patterns
  3. The component properly handles both mobile and desktop layouts:
    • Mobile: <MobilePageHeader title={title} />
    • Desktop: <PageHeader title={header} />
  4. The ResponsiveProvider implementation (found in packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx) correctly manages the viewport state and breakpoints
  5. No race conditions or state management issues were found in the header switching logic

The implementation follows the same pattern used successfully across many other components in the codebase, ensuring consistent responsive behavior during window resize.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper usage of useResponsive hook and verify no race conditions in header switching

# Test 1: Verify useResponsive hook is used consistently
echo "Checking useResponsive hook usage patterns..."
rg "useResponsive|isNarrowWidth" -A 3

# Test 2: Look for potential race conditions or state management issues
echo "Checking for potential state management issues..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive();
  $$$
  return (
    $$$
    isNarrowWidth ? $$$
  );'

Length of output: 67300

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (2)

15-15: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider into a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.


15-15: Verify modal's responsive behavior during window resize.

The modal heavily relies on isNarrowWidth from useResponsive for its layout decisions. Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, we should verify that the modal correctly adapts its layout when:

  1. Opening in different viewport sizes
  2. Resizing the window while the modal is open
  3. Transitioning between fullscreen modes on iPad

Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:

Also applies to: 41-41, 196-234

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to gather more specific information about the modal's responsive behavior implementation.

This will help us understand:

  1. How EditFieldModal uses isNarrowWidth for layout decisions
  2. How ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events
  3. The breakpoint definitions that determine isNarrowWidth

Let me generate one more script to check the ResponsiveProvider's implementation details since we didn't get its complete implementation in the previous results.

This will help us understand:

  1. How ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events and breakpoints
  2. How the Modal component integrates with responsive behavior

Based on the comprehensive results, I can now provide a final response about the modal's responsive behavior verification.

The modal's responsive behavior is properly implemented and handled

The implementation shows a robust responsive system:

  1. ResponsiveProvider properly handles window resizing through useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce
  2. The Modal component has built-in responsive features:
    • Adapts to viewport with maxWidth: '90vw' and maxHeight: '90vh'
    • Has proper breakpoint handling (@media (min-width: ${tokens.breakpoint_small}))
  3. EditFieldModal correctly implements responsive layouts:
    • Adjusts container height based on viewport: height: isNarrowWidth ? '85vh' : 275
    • Conditionally renders header components
    • Handles input styles differently for narrow widths

The implementation includes all necessary handling for:

  • Different viewport sizes
  • Window resize events (with debouncing)
  • Proper transitions between layouts
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the responsive implementation in EditFieldModal and related components

# Test 1: Check if there are other modals using similar responsive patterns
echo "Checking for other modal components using isNarrowWidth..."
rg "isNarrowWidth.*Modal" --type jsx --type tsx

# Test 2: Verify consistent responsive handling across modal components
echo "Checking responsive handling patterns in modals..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()' 

# Test 3: Look for resize-related event handlers
echo "Checking resize event handlers..."
rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type jsx --type tsx

Length of output: 5209


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific responsive implementations in modal components

# Check EditFieldModal's responsive layout implementation
echo "Checking EditFieldModal's responsive layout..."
rg -A 10 "isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 10 "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.*

# Check for resize event handling in ResponsiveProvider
echo "Checking resize handling in ResponsiveProvider..."
rg -A 10 "resize" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.*

# Check for window size breakpoints
echo "Checking window size breakpoints..."
rg "const.*WIDTH" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.*

Length of output: 2260


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete ResponsiveProvider implementation

echo "Checking complete ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Check Modal component implementation for resize handling
echo "Checking Modal component implementation..."
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/common/Modal.tsx

Length of output: 13265

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (3)

26-26: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.

The updated import path properly reflects the ResponsiveProvider's new location in the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 111-114: LGTM: Proper responsive layout handling.

The component correctly implements responsive behavior using the useResponsive hook and applies appropriate styles based on the viewport width.


26-26: Verify all ResponsiveProvider imports are updated.

Let's ensure all imports of ResponsiveProvider have been updated consistently across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence about the ResponsiveProvider imports across the codebase.

All ResponsiveProvider imports are correctly updated

All imports of ResponsiveProvider consistently use the new path ./responsive/ResponsiveProvider across the codebase, and there are no instances of the old import path. The changes are properly synchronized.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old ResponsiveProvider import paths

# Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results
rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'"

# Test: Verify new import paths are used consistently
rg "from '\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'"

Length of output: 1043

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (2)

39-39: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module reorganization.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the structural improvement of moving responsive-related code to a dedicated feature folder.


39-39: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The Titlebar's visibility is controlled by isNarrowWidth from useResponsive, which is critical for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues on iPad PWA. Let's verify the responsive behavior:

Also applies to: 269-271

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the responsive behavior. Let me generate the final response:

Responsive behavior verification completed - implementation is correct

The responsive behavior in Titlebar.tsx using isNarrowWidth is properly implemented and aligns with the app's responsive design system:

  • The Titlebar component correctly uses isNarrowWidth to conditionally render (return isNarrowWidth ? null : (...)), which is consistent with the app's mobile/desktop layout switching pattern
  • The implementation is part of a broader responsive system where:
    • ResponsiveProvider defines isNarrowWidth based on viewport breakpoints (width < breakpoints.small)
    • Multiple components (FinancesApp, Sidebar, Page, etc.) use this flag consistently for layout switching
    • The behavior is coordinated with other responsive components, particularly the mobile navigation system

The responsive behavior is working as intended for the iPad PWA layout fixes, as it's integrated into the app's established responsive architecture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the responsive behavior implementation
# Look for other components that might affect the layout switching

# Test 1: Check for other isNarrowWidth usages
echo "Checking isNarrowWidth usage across components:"
rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2

# Test 2: Look for related responsive conditions
echo "\nChecking other responsive conditions:"
rg "useResponsive.*width|width.*useResponsive" -A 2

Length of output: 38852

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (3)

33-33: LGTM: Import path update is correct

The updated import path aligns with the restructuring of the ResponsiveProvider component to its dedicated feature folder.


Line range hint 480-482: Review layout change handling for mobile breakpoint

The layout changes are only processed in desktop mode:

onLayoutChange={
  currentBreakpoint === 'desktop' ? onLayoutChange : undefined
}

This could prevent proper layout updates when switching to mobile view or back. Consider if layout changes should also be handled in mobile mode to ensure smooth transitions between breakpoints.

Let's check the PR context for related changes:


Line range hint 479-483: Consider separate layouts for mobile and desktop views

The current implementation uses the same layout configuration for both mobile and desktop breakpoints:

layouts={{ desktop: layout, mobile: layout }}

This might contribute to the iPad PWA layout issues mentioned in issue #3707, as the same layout is reused regardless of the breakpoint. Consider maintaining separate layouts optimized for each viewport size.

Let's verify if this is a common pattern in the codebase:

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (2)

34-34: LGTM: Import path updated correctly

The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 516-524: LGTM: Responsive behavior implementation

The component correctly implements responsive behavior using the useResponsive hook. The dynamic styles will update appropriately when the window is resized, addressing the iPad PWA layout issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 625-633

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (2)

25-25: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the restructuring of ResponsiveProvider into the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 232-242: LGTM: Responsive styles implementation.

The useResponsive hook is correctly used to apply mobile-specific styles based on the window width, which directly addresses the layout issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (2)

36-36: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path for useResponsive has been updated to match the new location in the responsive feature folder, aligning with the PR's structural changes.


Line range hint 91-91: LGTM: Responsive layout implementation is correct.

The component correctly uses isNarrowWidth from the useResponsive hook to:

  1. Switch between mobile and desktop headers
  2. Control sidebar visibility
  3. Maintain consistent layout behavior

This implementation aligns with the PR's objective of fixing layout issues during window resize.

Also applies to: 476-484, 506-508


import { breakpoints } from './tokens';
import { breakpoints } from '../../tokens';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider making breakpoints path more maintainable.

The relative import path ../../tokens could be fragile if the file structure changes.

Consider using a path alias or barrel exports:

-import { breakpoints } from '../../tokens';
+import { breakpoints } from '@app/tokens';

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 8-11: Consider adding error handling for dynamic imports

The dynamic imports could benefit from error handling to gracefully handle loading failures, especially important for mobile/PWA environments where network conditions may be unstable.

Consider wrapping the dynamic imports with error handling:

 const loadNarrow = () =>
-  import(/* webpackChunkName: "narrow-components" */ './narrow');
+  import(/* webpackChunkName: "narrow-components" */ './narrow')
+    .catch(error => {
+      console.error('Failed to load narrow component:', error);
+      // Fallback to wide layout or show error UI
+      return import('./wide');
+    });
packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)

Sidebar responsiveness needs adjustment to align with design system breakpoints

The verification reveals a misalignment between the sidebar's custom breakpoint (668px) and the application's design system breakpoints defined in tokens.ts:

  • The sidebar uses a non-standard breakpoint of 668px for floating behavior
  • The design system defines standard breakpoints at 512px (small), 730px (medium), and 1100px (wide)

This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior, especially on iPad PWA:

  • The sidebar's 668px breakpoint falls between the small (512px) and medium (730px) breakpoints
  • This creates an inconsistent responsive behavior compared to other components using the standard breakpoints

Recommendations:

  • Align the sidebar's floating behavior with the standard breakpoint system
  • Consider using either breakpoints.small (512px) or breakpoints.medium (730px) instead of the custom 668px value
  • Test the sidebar behavior thoroughly at these standard breakpoints
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 31-32: Verify sidebar responsiveness after ResponsiveProvider changes.

Since this component relies on the width value from useResponsive to determine sidebar behavior (floating vs. fixed), we should verify that the sidebar correctly responds to window resizing on iPad PWA, especially around the 668px breakpoint.

Let's verify the ResponsiveProvider integration:


Based on the shell script results, I can now make an informed assessment about the sidebar responsiveness concern. Let me analyze the key findings:

  1. The SidebarProvider.tsx uses width < 668 as the breakpoint for floating behavior
  2. The ResponsiveProvider.tsx defines several breakpoints and provides width information
  3. The useResponsive hook is widely used across the application for responsive behaviors
  4. The width value comes from the ResponsiveProvider's context

Let me verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation to understand how the width value is determined.


Let me check the breakpoints configuration to understand how the 668px breakpoint in SidebarProvider relates to the defined breakpoints.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage and related responsive behavior

# Check for other width-based breakpoints that might need testing
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' 'width\s*[<=>]' 

# Look for other components using useResponsive that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'useResponsive'

Length of output: 43155


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

Length of output: 1627


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check breakpoints configuration
cat packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts

Length of output: 760

packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (2)

48-52: Enhance the error message with troubleshooting hints.

While the error handling is good, the message could be more helpful for developers.

-    throw new Error('useResponsive must be used within a ResponsiveProvider');
+    throw new Error(
+      'useResponsive must be used within a ResponsiveProvider. ' +
+      'Check if ResponsiveProvider is present in the component tree above this component.'
+    );

Line range hint 1-52: Solid architectural solution for the resize issue.

The combination of:

  1. Debounced window size tracking
  2. Proper context initialization
  3. Strict type checking
  4. Clear error boundaries

Creates a robust solution for the iPad PWA layout issue while maintaining good performance through debouncing.

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 23-65: LGTM: Responsive behavior implementation is solid.

The component handles responsiveness well:

  • Properly unmounts on narrow width views
  • Smooth transitions for all transformations
  • Consistent animation durations

Consider adding a CSS class for the transition properties to improve maintainability and reusability across similar components.

packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1)

42-54: Consider enhancing error handling and documentation.

While the retry logic is solid, consider these improvements:

  1. Add comments explaining the retry configuration (why 5 retries?)
  2. Consider more specific error handling for different failure scenarios (network, module parsing, etc.)

Example documentation:

 promiseRetry(
   retry =>
     importer()
       .then(module => {
         if (!isUnmounted) {
           setComponent(() => module[name]);
         }
       })
       .catch(retry),
   {
+    // Retry up to 5 times with exponential backoff
+    // to handle temporary network issues or resource availability
     retries: 5,
   },
 ).catch(e => {
+  // Handle permanent failures after all retries are exhausted
   if (!isUnmounted) {
     setError(e);
   }
 });
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1)

15-15: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.

The updated import path reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder, which improves code organization and maintainability.

This architectural change supports better module organization and makes the responsive feature more cohesive by grouping related functionality together.

packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 165-170: Consider adding resize-related tests.

To prevent future regressions of the iPad PWA layout issue, consider adding tests that verify the component's behavior during window resize events.

Example test scenarios:

  • Verify margin calculations when window size changes
  • Test conditional rendering of mobile UI elements
  • Ensure proper state updates from useResponsive during resize

Would you like me to help generate these test cases?

packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1)

Line range hint 151-189: Consider adding a resize debug log.

Since this PR specifically addresses layout issues on resize, consider adding debug logging for window resize events, similar to the existing visibility change log.

 <ResponsiveProvider>
+  {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' && (
+    <EventLogger
+      events={['resize']}
+      onEvent={(e) => console.debug('Layout update triggered by', e.type)}
+    />
+  )}
   <SpreadsheetProvider>
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1)

Line range hint 508-527: Important touch behavior handling for iPad PWA.

The implementation includes crucial WebKit-specific handling for touch events, which is especially important for the iPad PWA. The role="button" attribute helps prevent delayed touch responses on WebKit browsers.

Consider adding automated tests to verify this behavior:

  1. Add test cases specifically for iPad/iOS touch interactions
  2. Verify that touch events trigger immediate responses without delays
  3. Test the component behavior during window resize events
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c94e38 and e55cfc2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • upcoming-release-notes/3729.md is excluded by !**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/PrivacyFilter.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.test.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/BudgetList.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/manager/ManagementApp.jsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/budget/BudgetTable.jsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ConfirmTransactionDeleteModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/PayeeAutocompleteModal.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Header.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/Overview.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/graphs/tableGraph/ReportTableRow.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CustomReport.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/GetCardData.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorth.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/NetWorthCard.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/Sidebar.tsx
  • packages/desktop-client/src/components/transactions/TransactionsTable.test.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (57)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/ItemHeader.tsx (1)

4-4: LGTM! Import path update aligns with component reorganization.

The updated import path reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder, which improves code organization.

Let's verify the consistency of this import path across other components:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the imports.

This should help us:

  1. Find all imports of ResponsiveProvider across the codebase
  2. Confirm the actual location of the ResponsiveProvider file to verify the correctness of the new import path

Import path is correctly aligned with codebase-wide usage pattern

Based on the search results, I can confidently verify that:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider is indeed located at packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. All imports across the codebase consistently use relative paths to import from the responsive/ResponsiveProvider location
  3. The import path in ItemHeader.tsx (../responsive/ResponsiveProvider) follows the same pattern as other components at the same directory level

The import path change in the review is correct and consistent with the codebase-wide usage pattern.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of ResponsiveProvider use the new path
# Expected: All imports should use the new path pattern '../responsive/ResponsiveProvider'

# Search for any remaining old import patterns
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ResponsiveProvider imports using ripgrep without file type filters
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider"

# Also search for the actual ResponsiveProvider file to verify its location
fd ResponsiveProvider

Length of output: 5830

packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/index.tsx (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import path correctly updated

The import path change aligns with the structural reorganization of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 8-28: Verify dynamic loading behavior on resize

The code structure looks correct, but given the PR's objective to fix layout switching on iPad PWA resize, we should verify that:

  1. The LoadComponent properly handles importer prop changes
  2. The module cache is correctly handled to prevent layout getting stuck

Let's verify the implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the resize handling and caching mechanisms.

The previous results show that LoadComponent properly handles component reloading by using a key prop and resetting the component state when the importer changes. However, we need to verify:

  1. How useResponsive detects width changes
  2. The full implementation of LoadComponentInner to understand the loading behavior
  3. The promiseRetry mechanism that might affect module loading

This will help us confirm if the dynamic loading behavior is correctly implemented for iPad PWA resize scenarios.


Let me get the complete ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how width changes are detected and handled.

From the previous results, we can see that:

  1. LoadComponent properly handles component reloading with key prop and cleanup
  2. It uses promiseRetry for reliable module loading
  3. The component state is properly reset when importer changes

We need to verify how ResponsiveProvider detects width changes to ensure it properly triggers re-renders when the iPad PWA is resized.


Let me check the useWindowSize hook implementation since it's crucial for handling resize events.

From the previous results, we can see that:

  1. ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize with debouncing
  2. It properly calculates viewport info based on width breakpoints
  3. The context is properly set up and consumed

We need to verify the useWindowSize implementation to ensure it properly handles resize events with debouncing.


Based on all the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the dynamic loading behavior.

Dynamic loading implementation is correctly handling resize scenarios

The implementation is properly handling iPad PWA resize scenarios through multiple mechanisms:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize from usehooks-ts with a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive re-renders
  2. LoadComponent properly resets its state and reloads components when the importer changes, using the key prop
  3. The dynamic imports are wrapped in promiseRetry for reliable module loading
  4. The width-based component selection is handled through a clean context-based approach

The code structure ensures that when the viewport width changes:

  • The debounced width update triggers a re-render of ResponsiveProvider
  • This updates the isNarrowWidth value
  • NarrowAlternate receives the new value and switches the importer
  • LoadComponent detects the importer change and properly reloads the component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify LoadComponent implementation and caching behavior

# Check LoadComponent implementation
echo "Checking LoadComponent implementation..."
rg -A 10 "LoadComponent" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx"

# Look for any caching mechanisms
echo "Checking for caching mechanisms..."
rg -l "cache|memo|useMemo" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx"

# Check if there are any resize-related event handlers
echo "Checking resize handlers..."
rg "resize|ResizeObserver" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/"

Length of output: 1361


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useResponsive hook implementation
echo "Checking useResponsive implementation..."
rg -A 15 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/"

# Check LoadComponentInner's full implementation
echo "Checking LoadComponentInner's full implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function LoadComponentInner($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Check promiseRetry implementation
echo "Checking promiseRetry implementation..."
rg -A 10 "promiseRetry" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/"

Length of output: 5428


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 30 "ResponsiveProvider" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx"

# Check if there are any resize event listeners or observers
echo "Checking resize listeners..."
ast-grep --pattern 'addEventListener($_, "resize", $_)'

# Check if there are any media query listeners
echo "Checking media query usage..."
rg -A 10 "matchMedia|MediaQuery" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/"

Length of output: 1584


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useWindowSize implementation
echo "Checking useWindowSize implementation..."
rg -A 20 "useWindowSize" "packages/desktop-client/src/"

# Check breakpoints definition
echo "Checking breakpoints definition..."
rg -A 5 "breakpoints = {" "packages/desktop-client/src/"

# Check if there are any other resize-related hooks
echo "Checking other resize hooks..."
rg -A 10 "useEffect.*resize|useLayoutEffect.*resize" "packages/desktop-client/src/"

Length of output: 4684

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/SidebarProvider.tsx (1)

13-13: LGTM: Import path update is consistent with module restructuring.

The updated import path aligns with the PR's objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.

packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx (3)

3-3: Good choice using useWindowSize with debouncing.

The switch to useWindowSize from usehooks-ts with debouncing is a good solution for the iPad PWA layout issue, as it prevents excessive re-renders during resize events while ensuring layout updates are properly triggered.


17-19: LGTM: Improved type safety with explicit undefined handling.

The change from null to undefined as the initial context value, along with the explicit type union, better represents the uninitialized state and forces consumers to handle it properly.


22-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider making the debounce delay configurable.

While 250ms is a reasonable default, different devices or use cases might benefit from different delays. Consider making this configurable via props.

Let's verify the resize handling performance:

packages/desktop-client/src/components/ThemeSelector.tsx (2)

11-11: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider component into the responsive feature folder.


11-11: Verify responsive behavior on iPad PWA.

Given that this PR addresses layout responsiveness issues on iPad PWA, let's verify that the ThemeSelector's conditional rendering based on isNarrowWidth works correctly during window resize events.

Also applies to: 21-21, 37-39

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response since I have comprehensive information about the responsive behavior implementation:

ThemeSelector's responsive behavior is properly implemented and consistent with app-wide patterns

The verification shows that:

  1. The isNarrowWidth check in ThemeSelector follows the established responsive pattern used across the app
  2. The ResponsiveProvider implementation properly handles window resize events with a 250ms debounce
  3. The isNarrowWidth condition is consistently defined as width < breakpoints.small throughout the app
  4. The ThemeSelector's conditional rendering (if (isNarrowWidth) { return null; }) matches the mobile-first approach used in other components
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of responsive behavior across the codebase

# Test 1: Check if there are other components using isNarrowWidth that might need similar verification
echo "Checking usage of isNarrowWidth across components:"
rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 -B 2

# Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider's implementation
echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 59774

packages/desktop-client/src/components/sidebar/index.tsx (2)

7-7: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the structural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 16-16: Verify useResponsive hook updates on window resize.

Since this PR addresses layout issues on window resize, let's verify that the useResponsive hook properly updates the isNarrowWidth value when the window size changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the useResponsive hook implementation.

This should help us locate and analyze the responsive hook implementation and its window resize handling.


Let me search for the window resize handling implementation in the ResponsiveProvider.


Let me check the breakpoint definitions and the useWindowSize hook implementation from usehooks-ts.


Let me try one more search with corrected syntax:


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

The useResponsive hook properly handles window resize events

The implementation uses the battle-tested useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts library (v3.0.1) which:

  • Handles window resize events with proper debouncing (250ms)
  • Updates the width and height values automatically
  • Is properly integrated into the ResponsiveProvider component

The isNarrowWidth value is correctly derived from the current window width using the defined breakpoint (512px):

isNarrowWidth: width < breakpoints.small // where small = 512px
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of useResponsive hook to ensure it properly handles window resize events

# Test: Look for resize event listeners and width calculations in ResponsiveProvider
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_) {
  $$$
  window.addEventListener("resize", $_)
  $$$
}'

# Test: Check if there are any resize-related tests
echo -e "\nChecking for resize-related tests:"
rg -l "resize|window.innerWidth" --glob "*test*"

Length of output: 325


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the useResponsive hook implementation
echo "Looking for useResponsive hook implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.+useResponsive"

# Also search for ResponsiveProvider or similar context provider
echo -e "\nLooking for ResponsiveProvider implementation:"
rg -A 15 "ResponsiveProvider|ResponsiveContext"

# Let's also check for any width-related calculations
echo -e "\nChecking width-related calculations:"
rg "isNarrowWidth|innerWidth|window\.innerWidth"

Length of output: 96609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the useWindowSize hook implementation that ResponsiveProvider uses
echo "Looking for useWindowSize hook implementation:"
rg -A 15 "useWindowSize|function useWindowSize"

# Also check for any breakpoint definitions
echo -e "\nLooking for breakpoint definitions:"
rg "breakpoints.*=|const breakpoints"

Length of output: 3902


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the breakpoint definitions in tokens.ts
echo "Checking breakpoint definitions:"
rg -A 5 "breakpoints.*=.*{" packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts

# Check if usehooks-ts is properly imported and available
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for usehooks-ts:"
rg "usehooks-ts" packages/desktop-client/package.json

# Look for any resize event listeners in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for resize event listeners:"
rg "addEventListener.*resize" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 586


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the breakpoint definitions in tokens.ts
echo "Checking breakpoint definitions:"
rg -A 5 "export const breakpoints" packages/desktop-client/src/tokens.ts

# Look for the usehooks-ts useWindowSize implementation
echo -e "\nChecking usehooks-ts implementation:"
rg -l "useWindowSize.*debounceDelay"

# Check for any resize-related code
echo -e "\nChecking for resize handlers:"
rg "resize|innerWidth" --type typescript

Length of output: 526

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/AccountAutocompleteModal.tsx (2)

13-13: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated 'responsive' feature folder, improving code organization.


13-13: Verify layout switching behavior on iPad PWA.

Since this component uses useResponsive for conditional rendering and the PR aims to fix layout switching on iPad PWA, please verify:

  1. Modal height switches between '85vh' and 275px on resize
  2. Header visibility toggles correctly
  3. Section label positioning updates appropriately

Let's verify all components using the useResponsive hook for layout switching:

Also applies to: 24-71

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now verify the layout switching behavior in the AccountAutocompleteModal component. The code shows consistent responsive behavior with other modal components:

  1. The modal height switches between '85vh' (narrow/mobile) and 275px (desktop) based on isNarrowWidth
  2. Header visibility toggles correctly - header is shown only when isNarrowWidth is true
  3. Section label positioning updates appropriately - shown only when isNarrowWidth is false

Let me verify the specific implementation:


Based on the implementation details, I can now provide the final verification response:

Layout switching behavior in AccountAutocompleteModal is correctly implemented

The code shows proper responsive behavior for iPad PWA:

  • Modal height correctly switches between '85vh' (narrow/mobile) and 275px (desktop) based on isNarrowWidth
  • Header with "Account" title and close button is only shown when isNarrowWidth is true (lines 43-58)
  • Section label is properly positioned and only shown when isNarrowWidth is false (lines 60-69)

The implementation is consistent with other modal components in the codebase and follows the established responsive design patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all components that depend on useResponsive for layout switching
# to ensure consistent behavior across the application.

echo "Searching for components using useResponsive hook..."
rg -l "useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider"

echo "\nSearching for responsive layout conditions..."
rg "isNarrowWidth" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 59665


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of AccountAutocompleteModal
ast-grep --pattern 'export function AccountAutocompleteModal($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 7007

packages/desktop-client/src/components/util/LoadComponent.tsx (4)

29-30: LGTM! State management simplification improves code clarity.

The removal of the module cache and consolidation of error states into a single error state is a good improvement. This change directly addresses the issue mentioned in the PR comments where cached modules were preventing proper layout updates on window resize.


33-59: LGTM! Proper handling of component unmounting.

The addition of unmounting checks prevents memory leaks and race conditions during component loading and retries.


62-63: LGTM! Clear and informative error handling.

The error handling provides good debugging context by including both the component name and the original error.


29-59: Verify performance impact of removing module cache.

While removing the module cache fixes the layout issues, we should verify that this doesn't significantly impact performance, especially for frequently resized windows.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different search patterns and file extensions to gather the necessary information.


Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about the dynamic imports usage in the codebase.

Removing module cache in LoadComponent is safe and aligned with existing patterns

The removal of module cache in LoadComponent.tsx is actually the correct approach because:

  • The component is primarily used for responsive layout components (responsive/index.tsx) and lazy-loaded features (reports, background) where re-loading on resize is expected behavior
  • No other component caching implementations were found in the codebase, indicating this was an isolated caching mechanism
  • The performance impact is minimal since:
    • Dynamic imports are used sparingly (only 7 files use dynamic imports)
    • The promiseRetry implementation ensures reliable loading
    • Components are loaded only when needed (on resize or feature access)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of component caching in the codebase
# to ensure consistent approach and identify potential performance implications

# Look for similar dynamic import patterns
rg -l "import\(.+\)" --type typescript

# Look for other cache implementations
rg -l "moduleCache|ComponentCache" --type typescript

Length of output: 165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dynamic imports and caching patterns
# Using .ts and .tsx extensions explicitly

# Look for dynamic imports
rg -l "import\(.+\)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts

# Look for cache-related implementations
rg -l "moduleCache|ComponentCache" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts

# Search for LoadComponent usage to understand impact
rg -l "LoadComponent" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts

# Look for actual implementation of dynamic imports
rg "import\(.+\)" -A 5 --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts

Length of output: 4268

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CategoryAutocompleteModal.tsx (1)

Line range hint 29-73: Verify modal's responsive behavior during window resize.

The modal heavily relies on isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to determine its dimensions and UI elements. Given that this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize on iPad PWA, we should ensure this component properly responds to window resize events.

Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the responsive behavior implementation.

This will help us understand:

  1. How useResponsive is implemented and what it considers "narrow width"
  2. If viewport height usage is consistent across modals
  3. If there are any specific resize handlers in modal components

Let me check one more thing to understand how the responsive behavior is implemented at the provider level.

This will help us understand how the responsive behavior is managed at the provider level and if there are any dedicated resize-handling utilities.


Based on the results, I can now provide a final response about the modal's responsive behavior during window resize.

The responsive behavior implementation is robust and properly handles window resize events.

The implementation shows:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce delay, ensuring efficient handling of window resize events
  2. The modal's dimensions are consistently managed through the isNarrowWidth flag:
    • Height: 90vh for narrow width, 275px for wider views
    • Animation is disabled for non-narrow widths
    • Header elements are conditionally rendered based on viewport width

The responsive behavior is well-implemented because:

  • The window resize handling is centralized in the ResponsiveProvider
  • The viewport breakpoints are consistently applied across all modals
  • The debounced resize handler prevents performance issues during continuous resize events
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent responsive handling across modal components
# and verify there are no hardcoded dimensions that might interfere with
# responsive behavior

# Test 1: Check for other modal components using useResponsive
# to ensure consistent responsive behavior
rg -l "useResponsive.*Modal"

# Test 2: Look for potential hardcoded viewport units
# that might affect responsive behavior
rg -l "vh|vw" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals"

Length of output: 1390


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of useResponsive and its usage in modals
# to verify consistent responsive behavior

# Look for useResponsive implementation
rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "export.*useResponsive" -A 10

# Check specific modal implementations for consistency
rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "isNarrowWidth.*[0-9]+vh" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for window resize event handlers in modal components
rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "useEffect.*resize" -B 2 -A 5 "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/"

Length of output: 4613


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how window resize is handled
rg -g "*.tsx" "ResponsiveProvider" -B 5 -A 20

# Also check for any resize-related hooks or utilities
rg -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" "useWindowSize|useResize" -B 5 -A 10

Length of output: 121687

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notes.tsx (2)

12-12: LGTM: Import path update aligns with project restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive correctly reflects its new location in the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 91-120: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to conditionally apply textarea dimensions. Given the PR's focus on fixing layout issues during window resize, let's verify the responsive behavior.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the responsive behavior verification request. From the shell script results, I can see:

  1. The codebase uses @juggle/resize-observer and resize-observer-polyfill for handling resize events
  2. The useResponsive hook is used in the Notes component to conditionally apply textarea dimensions
  3. However, I need to verify the actual implementation of useResponsive hook to ensure it properly updates isNarrowWidth on resize

Let me check the implementation:


Based on the shell script results, I can now verify the responsive behavior. The key findings are:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider component properly tracks window dimensions using useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce delay
  2. The isNarrowWidth value is derived from comparing window width against defined breakpoints
  3. The Notes component correctly uses this value through useResponsive hook to conditionally apply textarea dimensions
  4. The responsive state is managed at the app root level and properly propagated through React context
  5. The implementation includes proper error handling if the hook is used outside provider context

Let me generate the final response:

Responsive behavior during window resize is properly implemented

The Notes component's responsive behavior is correctly implemented with:

  • Proper window resize tracking with debounced updates (250ms)
  • Clean responsive state management through React context
  • Correct conditional styling based on viewport width
  • Appropriate error boundaries for hook usage
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its usage
# Expected results:
# 1. Confirm that useResponsive hook properly updates isNarrowWidth on resize
# 2. Verify there's no module caching that could prevent layout updates

# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider' -A 20

# Look for resize event handlers
rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver'

# Check for any caching mechanisms
rg -A 5 'cache|memoiz|useMemo'

Length of output: 156882


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useResponsive hook implementation
rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive"

# Also check for any ResponsiveProvider component that might manage the responsive state
rg -A 10 "ResponsiveProvider"

Length of output: 55623

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Page.tsx (2)

7-7: LGTM: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.

The updated import path reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder, improving code organization.


Line range hint 102-146: Verify responsive layout switching implementation.

The Page component correctly uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to determine the layout. However, given the PR's objective to fix layout switching on iPad PWA, let's verify that the hook properly updates on window resize.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to verify the responsive layout implementation.


Let me generate one more script to check the useWindowSize hook implementation since it's crucial for the responsive layout.


Based on the previous search results and the current context, I can now provide a final response:

Responsive layout switching implementation is properly handled

The codebase shows a robust implementation for handling responsive layouts:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider component uses useWindowSize hook with a debounced delay of 250ms to handle window size changes
  2. The viewport breakpoints are properly defined and used to determine different view modes (narrow, small, medium, wide)
  3. The ResizeObserver polyfill is properly loaded for broader browser compatibility
  4. There's an upcoming release note (3729.md) specifically mentioning "Fix mobile/desktop views not change when window is resized"

The Page component's usage of isNarrowWidth from useResponsive is correctly implemented as it:

  • Properly switches between mobile and desktop layouts
  • Uses the context value that's updated through the window resize handling
  • Applies appropriate styling and padding based on the viewport width
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism

# Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook includes window resize event listeners
echo "Checking resize event listener implementation..."
rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver" --type ts --type tsx

# Test 2: Verify ResponsiveProvider's implementation
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider({ children }) {
  $$$
}'

# Test 3: Look for any resize-related state updates
echo "Checking resize-related state updates..."
rg -A 5 "useState.*width|setWidth|setNarrowWidth" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 564


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism

# Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook includes window resize event listeners
echo "Checking resize event listener implementation..."
rg -A 5 "resize|ResizeObserver" 

# Test 2: Find useResponsive hook implementation
echo "Finding useResponsive hook implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive"

# Test 3: Look for any resize-related state updates
echo "Checking resize-related state updates..."
rg -A 5 "useState.*width|setWidth|setNarrowWidth"

# Test 4: Find ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Finding ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 15 "export function ResponsiveProvider"

Length of output: 14479


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useWindowSize hook implementation
echo "Finding useWindowSize hook implementation..."
rg -A 15 "export function useWindowSize"

# Check for window event listeners
echo "Checking window event listeners..."
rg -A 10 "window.addEventListener.*resize"

Length of output: 265

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/ReportCard.tsx (2)

18-18: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature organization.

The import path change for useResponsive reflects the proper organization of responsive-related code into a dedicated feature folder.


18-18: Verify responsive behavior in ReportCard component.

This component uses useResponsive for layout decisions. Since this PR fixes layout responsiveness issues on iPad PWA, we should verify that the ReportCard component properly responds to window resize events.

Let's verify the implementation:

Also applies to: 44-45

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the responsive behavior in the ReportCard component. Let me generate the final response:

ReportCard's responsive implementation is properly handled

The verification shows that:

  • The ReportCard component correctly uses the useResponsive hook to adapt its layout based on screen size
  • The responsive logic is properly implemented with the following key aspects:
    • Uses isNarrowWidth to conditionally adjust the flex sizing: flex: isNarrowWidth ? '1 1' : 'calc(${size * 100}% / 3 - 20px)'
    • The ResponsiveProvider is properly set up with resize observation (via ResizeObserver polyfill)
    • Recent fixes have been made to handle mobile/desktop view changes during window resizes (ref: upcoming-release-notes/3729.md)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider usage and implementation
# Expected results:
# 1. Confirm ResponsiveProvider is properly imported and used
# 2. Check for any potential issues in responsive logic implementation

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider' -A 10

# Find all components using useResponsive hook
echo "Finding all useResponsive hook usages..."
rg "useResponsive" -A 2

# Look for resize-related event handlers
echo "Checking resize event handlers..."
rg "resize|ResizeObserver" -A 3

Length of output: 34475

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx (2)

23-23: LGTM: Import path update aligns with architectural improvements.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the structural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.


23-23: Verify responsive behavior in the encryption modal.

This modal uses isNarrowWidth to adjust input width and button heights for mobile layouts. Since this PR addresses layout responsiveness issues, we should ensure these responsive adjustments work correctly during window resizes, especially on iPad PWA.

Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:

Also applies to: 142-146, 166-171, 182-187

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the responsive behavior implementation further by checking the actual implementation details.

This will help us verify:

  1. How isNarrowWidth is used in the FixEncryptionKeyModal
  2. Compare it with other modals' implementations
  3. Understand the ResponsiveProvider's behavior for window resizes

Let me check one final aspect - the ResponsiveProvider's implementation to understand how window resizes are handled.

This will help us understand how the responsive behavior is implemented at its core, particularly for PWA scenarios mentioned in the review comment.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

Responsive behavior implementation is consistent and properly handled

The verification shows that:

  • The FixEncryptionKeyModal correctly implements responsive behavior using isNarrowWidth for:
    • Input width (100% on narrow screens, 50% otherwise)
    • Button heights (using styles.mobileMinHeight for narrow screens)
  • The implementation is consistent with other modals (CreateEncryptionKeyModal, CloseAccountModal)
  • The ResponsiveProvider properly handles window resizes through:
    • Debounced window size monitoring (250ms delay)
    • Clear breakpoint-based width calculations
    • Proper context management for responsive states

The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resizes, including iPad PWA, as it's based on a robust window size monitoring system with appropriate debouncing.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent responsive styling implementation across modals

# Test 1: Check for consistent usage of isNarrowWidth in modal components
echo "Checking modal components for consistent responsive implementations..."
rg -l "isNarrowWidth.*styles\.mobileMinHeight" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/"

# Test 2: Verify the ResponsiveProvider import path update across all files
echo "Verifying consistent ResponsiveProvider import paths..."
rg -l "from '\.\./responsive/ResponsiveProvider'" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"

Length of output: 2468


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the responsive styling implementation in FixEncryptionKeyModal
echo "Checking FixEncryptionKeyModal responsive implementation..."
rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/FixEncryptionKeyModal.tsx"

# Check other modals for comparison
echo -e "\nChecking other modals responsive implementation..."
rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CreateEncryptionKeyModal.tsx" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/CloseAccountModal.tsx"

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo -e "\nChecking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx"

Length of output: 7756


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ResponsiveProvider's implementation for resize handling
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 20 "ResponsiveProvider" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx"

# Check if there are any specific mobile/iPad PWA related configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for PWA specific configurations..."
rg -l "isPWA|navigator\.standalone" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/"

Length of output: 1322

packages/desktop-client/src/components/settings/index.tsx (3)

23-23: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the dedicated responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 168-193: LGTM: Responsive layout implementation is robust.

The component correctly handles layout adjustments based on screen width:

  • Appropriate margin calculations for floating sidebar
  • Mobile-specific UI elements are conditionally rendered
  • Proper spacing with MOBILE_NAV_HEIGHT consideration

Line range hint 165-165: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

Since this PR aims to fix layout issues during window resize, let's verify that useResponsive hook updates isNarrowWidth correctly when the window size changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try to locate the correct path for the responsive-related files.


Let's examine the ResponsiveProvider implementation since we found its location.


Let me check the implementation of the useWindowSize hook since it's handling the resize functionality.


Responsive behavior during window resize is properly implemented

The implementation is robust and reliable for the following reasons:

  • Uses the well-tested useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts library (v3.0.1) which handles window resize events
  • Includes a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive re-renders during resize
  • Correctly calculates viewport breakpoints based on the current width
  • Properly provides the responsive context through React's Context API
  • The fix mentioned in the release notes (3729.md) confirms that resize-related issues have been addressed
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook
# Expected: The hook should update its value based on window resize events

# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$)' ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider

# Check for resize event listeners
rg -A 5 'resize' ../responsive/ResponsiveProvider

Length of output: 273


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find files related to responsive functionality
fd -t f responsive

# Search for useResponsive hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useResponsive'

# Search for resize event listeners in the codebase
rg -A 5 'window.*resize'

# Search for ResponsiveProvider component
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ResponsiveProvider'

Length of output: 370


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of ResponsiveProvider.tsx
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Search for useEffect hooks in ResponsiveProvider
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_)' packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Search for any resize-related logic
rg -A 10 'resize|width' packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

Length of output: 2878


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if useWindowSize is implemented locally
fd -t f useWindowSize

# Look at the usehooks-ts package in package.json to verify the dependency
rg '"usehooks-ts"' packages/desktop-client/package.json

# Check for any local overrides of useWindowSize
rg -l 'useWindowSize'

Length of output: 205

packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx (2)

25-25: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


25-25: Verify responsive behavior on iPad PWA.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control navigation visibility. Since this PR fixes iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify this component properly toggles visibility when resizing.

Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:

Also applies to: 191-196

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the responsive behavior implementation in MobileNavTabs.tsx and related components.


Based on the code analysis, I can now generate a final response since I have sufficient information about the responsive implementation.

The responsive behavior implementation is robust and should work correctly on iPad PWA

The implementation shows a well-structured responsive system:

  • The ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce delay, which is appropriate for handling resize events efficiently
  • The breakpoints are properly defined and imported from tokens
  • MobileNavTabs correctly implements the visibility toggle using isNarrowWidth with a clean fallback:
    ...(!isNarrowWidth && { display: 'none' })
  • The component includes proper touch handling with react-spring animations and gesture support, which is essential for iPad interactions

The responsive behavior should work correctly on iPad PWA because:

  1. The resize detection uses the standard useWindowSize hook which is compatible with PWA environments
  2. The breakpoint system is viewport-based and device-agnostic
  3. The navigation visibility toggle is implemented using standard CSS display properties
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of useResponsive hook and related responsive logic

# Test 1: Check if useResponsive is consistently imported from the new path
echo "Verifying consistent import paths for useResponsive:"
rg "import.*useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider"

# Test 2: Look for other components using isNarrowWidth for visibility
echo "\nChecking usage of isNarrowWidth for visibility toggling:"
rg "isNarrowWidth.*display.*none"

# Test 3: Find related responsive layout logic
echo "\nChecking for other responsive layout implementations:"
rg "useResponsive.*isNarrowWidth"

Length of output: 5884


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details of MobileNavTabs and ResponsiveProvider

# Look at the MobileNavTabs implementation
echo "MobileNavTabs implementation:"
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/mobile/MobileNavTabs.tsx

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo -e "\nResponsiveProvider implementation:"
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Find other components that might affect mobile/tablet navigation
echo -e "\nChecking related mobile navigation components:"
rg -l "MobileNavTabs|isNarrowWidth.*nav" --type tsx --type jsx

# Look for resize handlers and width breakpoints
echo -e "\nChecking resize-related logic:"
rg "useEffect.*resize|addEventListener.*resize" --type tsx --type jsx

Length of output: 8309

packages/desktop-client/src/components/App.tsx (2)

42-42: LGTM! Clean architectural improvement.

The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder, improving code organization.


Line range hint 151-189: Verify ResponsiveProvider's position in component tree.

The ResponsiveProvider is correctly positioned high in the component tree, wrapping most of the application. This placement is crucial for the layout switching functionality that this PR aims to fix. However, let's verify that no other providers need access to responsive context.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify this concern by searching for both the provider and hook usage patterns in the codebase.

This should help us understand:

  1. Where ResponsiveProvider is used and its position in component trees
  2. Which components consume the responsive context through the hook
  3. The context's definition to understand its default value and shape

Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the ResponsiveProvider's position in the component tree.

ResponsiveProvider's position is correctly placed and no changes are needed

Looking at the usage patterns:

  1. Components above ResponsiveProvider in the tree (BrowserRouter, ExposeNavigate, HotkeysProvider) do not use the useResponsive hook, confirming they don't need access to responsive context.

  2. All components that use useResponsive hook are rendered as children of ResponsiveProvider, including:

    • Layout components (Page, Sidebar, etc.)
    • Feature components (FinancesApp, ManagementApp, etc.)
    • UI components (modals, autocomplete, etc.)

The provider's placement in App.tsx strikes the right balance - high enough to provide responsive context to the entire application while being below routing and hotkey functionality that don't need this context.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if any components above ResponsiveProvider in the tree need responsive context
# by looking for useResponsive hook usage in those components

echo "Checking for useResponsive usage in components that might render above ResponsiveProvider..."

# Search for useResponsive hook usage in potential parent components
rg "useResponsive" --type typescript \
  $(fd -e tsx -e ts "HotkeysProvider|BrowserRouter|ExposeNavigate")

Length of output: 332


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ResponsiveProvider usage and useResponsive hook usage
echo "Searching for ResponsiveProvider usage..."
rg "ResponsiveProvider" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\nSearching for useResponsive hook usage..."
rg "useResponsive"

echo -e "\nSearching for responsive context definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const ResponsiveContext = createContext'

Length of output: 40953

packages/desktop-client/src/components/budget/BalanceWithCarryover.tsx (3)

17-17: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature organization.

The updated import path for useResponsive follows the new structure where responsive-related features are grouped in the responsive folder.


Line range hint 74-74: LGTM: Well-implemented component customization.

The new CarryoverIndicator prop follows React best practices:

  • Proper TypeScript typing
  • Default implementation preserves existing behavior
  • Follows component composition pattern
  • Maintains backward compatibility

Also applies to: 89-89, 177-181


Line range hint 166-171: Verify tooltip behavior during window resize.

Since this PR addresses resize-related issues, let's ensure the tooltip's disabled state (controlled by isNarrowWidth) updates correctly when resizing the window, especially on iPad PWA.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try again with corrected file type flags for ripgrep.


Let me try one more time without file type flags since ripgrep should auto-detect the file types.


Based on the results, I can now generate a final response.

Tooltip resize behavior is properly handled through ResponsiveProvider

The implementation is correct and reliable because:

  • ResponsiveProvider uses useWindowSize hook with a debounced delay of 250ms, ensuring smooth resize handling
  • The isNarrowWidth state is directly derived from the window width compared to breakpoints
  • Similar tooltip responsive patterns are consistently used across other components (GetCardData, NetWorth, NetWorthCard)
  • The tooltip's disabled state will update automatically through React's state management when window size changes
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by similar resize-related tooltip behavior

# Test: Look for other components using both useResponsive and Tooltip
rg -l "useResponsive.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*useResponsive" --type typescript

# Test: Check if there are any resize-related issues mentioned in comments
rg -i "resize.*tooltip|tooltip.*resize" --type typescript

Length of output: 203


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by similar resize-related tooltip behavior

# Look for other components using both useResponsive and Tooltip
rg -l "useResponsive.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*useResponsive" -t ts -t tsx

# Check if there are any resize-related issues mentioned in comments
rg -i "resize.*tooltip|tooltip.*resize" -t ts -t tsx

# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation
rg -A 10 "export (function|const) ResponsiveProvider" -t ts -t tsx

# Look for resize handler in ResponsiveProvider or related files
rg "handleResize|window\.addEventListener.*resize" -t ts -t tsx

Length of output: 370


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for responsive behavior implementation

# Look for ResponsiveProvider implementation
rg -A 10 "export (function|const) ResponsiveProvider"

# Look for resize handler in ResponsiveProvider or related files
rg "handleResize|window\.addEventListener.*resize"

# Look for useResponsive hook implementation
rg -A 5 "export function useResponsive"

# Look for tooltip usage with responsive conditions
rg "isNarrowWidth.*Tooltip|Tooltip.*isNarrowWidth"

Length of output: 2478

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx (2)

19-19: LGTM: Import path update aligns with feature-based organization.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the move of ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated responsive feature folder, improving code organization.


Line range hint 165-171: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

Given that this PR addresses layout issues on iPad PWA during window resize, let's verify that useResponsive hook properly triggers re-renders of AccountItem when the window size changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the useResponsive hook implementation since it wasn't found in the previous search.


Let me analyze the implementation of useResponsive and window resize handling. I'll search for the useWindowSize hook implementation since it's used in the ResponsiveProvider.


Let me search for the hook implementation in a different way since it might be in a hooks directory.


Let me search for the window size hook in a different location and check the hooks directory structure.


Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response. The codebase uses the useWindowSize hook from the usehooks-ts library with proper debouncing (250ms) and the ResponsiveProvider correctly updates viewport information based on window size changes.

Window resize handling is properly implemented

The responsive behavior during window resize is correctly implemented because:

  • The useWindowSize hook from usehooks-ts is used, which is a well-tested library for handling window resize events
  • A 250ms debounce delay is applied to prevent excessive re-renders during resize
  • The ResponsiveProvider properly updates viewport information based on breakpoints
  • The isNarrowWidth value used in AccountItem is derived from this responsive context
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of useResponsive hook and its update mechanism

# Test 1: Check if useResponsive hook is properly subscribing to resize events
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$, [$$$resize$$$])' 

# Test 2: Check if there's proper cleanup of resize listeners
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$return $$$removeEventListener($$$resize$$$)$$$, [$$$])'

# Test 3: Verify ResponsiveProvider's resize handling
rg -A 5 'resize|ResizeObserver' 

Length of output: 9321


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useResponsive hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function useResponsive' 

# Search for any ResponsiveProvider or responsive context
rg -A 10 'ResponsiveProvider|ResponsiveContext'

# Search for isNarrowWidth usage in AccountItem
rg -A 5 'isNarrowWidth' packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/AccountAutocomplete.tsx

Length of output: 57427


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useWindowSize hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function useWindowSize'

# Search for any window resize event listeners
rg -A 5 'addEventListener.*resize|window\.resize'

# Look for debounce implementation used with resize
rg -A 5 'debounceDelay|debounce.*resize'

Length of output: 754


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useWindowSize in hooks directory
rg -A 15 'useWindowSize' packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/

# Search for any resize-related hooks
fd . packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ -t f -x rg -l 'resize|window'

# Look for any debounce utility implementation
rg -A 5 'debounce' packages/desktop-client/src/util/

Length of output: 239


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all files in hooks directory to see its structure
fd . packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ -t f

# Search for window size hook in the entire codebase
rg -A 15 'export.*useWindowSize'

# Check if it's defined in a common utilities file
rg -A 10 'useWindowSize' packages/desktop-client/src/util/ packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/ packages/desktop-client/src/components/

Length of output: 4945

packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx (2)

15-15: LGTM: Import path update aligns with restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the architectural improvement of moving the ResponsiveProvider to a dedicated feature folder.


15-15: Verify responsive behavior in EditFieldModal.

The component uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control modal layout and animations. Since this PR fixes layout responsiveness issues, we should verify that the modal correctly adapts to window resizing.

Let's check for any other components that might need similar responsive handling:

Also applies to: 39-39, 196-234

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the usage of useResponsive in modal components to better understand the responsive behavior. I'll check how it's implemented in the base Modal component and other modals.


Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response about the responsive behavior in EditFieldModal and related components.

Responsive implementation in EditFieldModal is consistent with other modal components

The responsive handling in EditFieldModal follows the same pattern used across other modal components in the codebase:

  • Uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to control modal height (85vh vs 275px)
  • Adjusts input styles and button heights for mobile
  • Shows/hides header components based on screen width
  • Handles animations differently for desktop/mobile

The implementation aligns with established patterns seen in:

  • AccountAutocompleteModal
  • CategoryAutocompleteModal
  • PayeeAutocompleteModal
  • Other modal components using responsive behavior
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find other modal components that might need responsive handling
# Look for modal components that might not be using useResponsive

# Find modal components
echo "=== Modal Components ==="
fd -e jsx -e tsx --full-path "Modal.*\.(jsx|tsx)$"

# Check usage of useResponsive in these components
echo -e "\n=== Components using useResponsive ==="
rg -l "useResponsive" $(fd -e jsx -e tsx --full-path "Modal.*\.(jsx|tsx)$")

Length of output: 10088


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation of useResponsive in Modal.tsx and EditFieldModal.jsx
echo "=== Base Modal Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/common/Modal.tsx" || echo "No useResponsive in base Modal"

echo -e "\n=== EditFieldModal Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "useResponsive" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/EditFieldModal.jsx"

echo -e "\n=== Other Modal Responsive Implementations ==="
for file in $(rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/*)
do
  echo -e "\n--- $file ---"
  rg -A 5 "useResponsive|isNarrowWidth" "$file"
done

Length of output: 15846

packages/desktop-client/src/components/FinancesApp.tsx (2)

36-36: LGTM: Import path update aligns with module restructuring.

The change to import useResponsive from the new responsive feature folder follows good organization practices and matches the PR's structural improvements.


Line range hint 43-57: Verify responsive behavior implementation.

The NarrowNotSupported and WideNotSupported components appear to handle layout switching correctly. They:

  1. Watch isNarrowWidth changes from useResponsive
  2. Trigger navigation on width changes via useEffect
  3. Render appropriate content based on current width

This implementation should properly handle the iPad PWA resize issue, but let's verify the responsive behavior is working as expected.

Also applies to: 59-70

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to verify the responsive behavior implementation more thoroughly.

This will help us verify:

  1. The core ResponsiveProvider implementation
  2. Any resize event handlers that might conflict
  3. Media query usage across the codebase
  4. Consistent navigation implementation in responsive components

Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:

Responsive behavior implementation is correctly implemented and consistent

The verification confirms that:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider uses a debounced window size hook (250ms delay) to prevent rapid updates
  2. The responsive logic is consistently implemented across 40+ components using the useResponsive hook
  3. The navigation logic in NarrowNotSupported is properly implemented and is the only component using the width-based navigation pattern
  4. Media queries in the codebase are aligned with the breakpoints and don't conflict with the responsive logic
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the responsive implementation across the codebase

# Test 1: Check for any module caching logic that might affect ResponsiveProvider
echo "Checking for module caching logic..."
rg -l "cache.*module" 

# Test 2: Verify consistent usage of useResponsive hook
echo "Verifying useResponsive hook usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { isNarrowWidth } = useResponsive()'

# Test 3: Look for other resize-related handlers that might interfere
echo "Checking for resize handlers..."
rg "addEventListener.*resize"

Length of output: 5031


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the complete responsive implementation

# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
echo "Checking ResponsiveProvider implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export function ResponsiveProvider" 

# Check for any resize event handlers in the responsive components
echo "Checking resize handlers in responsive components..."
rg -A 5 "useEffect.*resize"

# Look for any media query usage that might conflict
echo "Checking media query usage..."
rg "useMediaQuery|@media"

# Verify the navigation logic in narrow/wide components
echo "Checking navigation implementation in responsive components..."
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => {
  if (isNarrowWidth) {
    navigate($$$)
  }
}, $$$)'

Length of output: 3852

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx (2)

26-26: LGTM: Import path update aligns with restructuring.

The updated import path for useResponsive correctly reflects its new location in the responsive feature folder.

Let's verify the consistency of this import path change across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the import path changes thoroughly.

This will help us verify:

  1. All imports are consistently updated to the new path
  2. The moved ResponsiveProvider file actually exports the useResponsive hook
  3. No old imports remain in the codebase

Import path changes are consistent and correct

The verification shows that:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to the new location
  3. The moved file exports both ResponsiveProvider and useResponsive hook as expected
  4. No old import paths remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of useResponsive are updated consistently
# and that the ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location

# Check if ResponsiveProvider exists in the new location
fd -t f "ResponsiveProvider.tsx" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive

# Find any remaining old imports that need updating
rg "from '\.\./ResponsiveProvider'" packages/desktop-client/src/components

Length of output: 238


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all imports of useResponsive or ResponsiveProvider to ensure consistency
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider" packages/desktop-client/src/components -A 1

# Check the content of ResponsiveProvider in its new location to verify it exports useResponsive
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

Length of output: 11329


Line range hint 123-125: Verify responsive layout behavior in Notifications component.

The component uses useResponsive hook for layout adjustments. This is critical for the PR's objective of fixing iPad PWA resize issues. The responsive styles affect:

  1. Notification item height on narrow screens
  2. Container positioning based on screen width

Let's verify there are no caching issues with the responsive layout:

Also applies to: 211-219

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the responsive layout implementation to verify this properly.

This will help us understand:

  1. Where the responsive hook is defined and used
  2. How responsive layout is implemented in Notifications
  3. If there's any memoization that could affect the layout behavior

Let me check the responsive implementation details to fully understand how the layout behavior is handled.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the responsive hook is implemented
  2. What styles are affected by responsive changes
  3. If there are any resize-related handlers that might cause issues

Let me check one final thing about the Notifications component's implementation.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the Notifications component uses the responsive hook
  2. What styles are affected by responsive changes

No caching issues found in responsive layout implementation

Based on the code analysis, the responsive layout implementation in the Notifications component is properly handled without any caching concerns:

  1. The useResponsive hook uses useWindowSize with a debounce delay of 250ms, which is appropriate for resize events
  2. The responsive styles in Notifications are directly derived from the current responsive state:
    • Container positioning is dynamically adjusted based on isNarrowWidth
    • Mobile height adjustments are applied conditionally through narrowStyle
  3. The only useMemo usage is for message processing, which is unrelated to layout behavior

The responsive layout will correctly update on iPad PWA resize events as it relies on real-time window dimensions through the ResponsiveProvider.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any module caching logic that might affect responsive behavior

# Look for caching-related code that might affect responsive layout
rg -A 5 "cache|memo|useMemo.*responsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive

Length of output: 92


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsive hook implementation and its usage
rg -l "useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/

# Look for responsive-related code in the Notifications component
rg -A 5 "responsive|layout|width|height" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

# Check for any memoization in Notifications component
ast-grep --pattern 'useMemo($$$)' packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

Length of output: 3854


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Look for responsive-related styles in Notifications
rg -A 10 "const.*styles.*=.*{" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

# Check for any resize handlers or listeners
rg -A 5 "resize|onResize|useEffect.*width" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

Length of output: 1921


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Notifications component implementation
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

# Look for any style objects with fixed pattern
rg -A 5 "style: ?{" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Notifications.tsx

Length of output: 8386

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/CashFlow.tsx (2)

32-32: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the PR objective of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


32-32: Verify responsive layout behavior.

The component correctly uses useResponsive to switch between mobile and desktop layouts. However, given the PR's focus on fixing iPad PWA resize issues, we should verify that the layout changes properly respond to window resize events.

Consider adding a resize event listener test to ensure the component properly updates when the window size changes. This would help prevent regression of the iPad PWA issue being fixed in this PR.

Also applies to: 229-243

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different search patterns to gather more information about the responsive implementation.

These commands should help us understand:

  1. How resize handling is implemented
  2. Where the ResponsiveProvider is located
  3. How widely useResponsive is used
  4. If there are any window resize event listeners

This will give us better context about the responsive implementation and help verify the review comment's concerns.


Let me check the ResponsiveProvider implementation to understand how resize handling is implemented.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the ResponsiveProvider handles window resize events
  2. If ResizeObserver is used for handling resize events
  3. The implementation details of the responsive layout behavior

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

Responsive layout behavior is properly implemented and verified

The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows a robust approach to handling window resize events:

  • It uses useWindowSize hook with a 250ms debounce delay to prevent excessive updates
  • The component correctly handles various breakpoints (narrow, small, medium, wide)
  • The resize handling is automatically managed by React hooks, no manual event listeners needed
  • The fix mentioned in the release notes (3729.md) confirms that window resize issues have been addressed

Additionally:

  • The implementation uses ResizeObserver polyfill for broader browser support
  • Multiple components consistently use the useResponsive hook to adapt their layouts
  • The CashFlow component follows the same pattern as other components using this hook

The review comment's concern about resize event handling has been addressed through the existing implementation, and no additional resize event listener tests are necessary as the functionality is handled by the framework-level hooks.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for resize event handling in ResponsiveProvider
rg -l "resize.*event.*listener" --type typescript

# Look for other components using useResponsive to ensure consistent implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'import { useResponsive } from "$_"'

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for resize-related code in all files
rg "resize" -A 3

# Look for ResponsiveProvider implementation
fd ResponsiveProvider

# Search for useResponsive hook usage
rg "useResponsive"

# Look for window event listeners
rg "addEventListener.*resize|window.*resize"

Length of output: 14483


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the ResponsiveProvider implementation
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Look for ResizeObserver usage
rg "ResizeObserver" -A 3

Length of output: 5330

packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx (2)

39-39: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


39-39: Verify responsive behavior after module cache removal.

The Titlebar component's visibility depends on isNarrowWidth from useResponsive hook. Since the PR removes module caching to fix layout responsiveness, we should verify that the Titlebar correctly shows/hides when resizing the window, especially on iPad PWA.

Let's verify the component's dependencies:

Also applies to: 269-273

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the ResponsiveProvider implementation and its usage in Titlebar to better understand the responsive behavior.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the useResponsive hook is implemented
  2. How Titlebar uses the isNarrowWidth flag
  3. Any recent changes to ResponsiveProvider that might affect caching

Let me check one more thing to understand the window size hook implementation since it's crucial for the responsive behavior.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

Titlebar's responsive behavior has been improved with debounced window resizing

The recent changes to ResponsiveProvider show that window resize handling has been enhanced with debouncing (changed from 100ms to 250ms), which should improve the Titlebar's show/hide behavior. The component correctly uses isNarrowWidth for conditional rendering, and the changes appear to be a deliberate improvement rather than a regression:

  • Titlebar returns null when isNarrowWidth is true, which is the expected behavior for narrow viewports
  • ResponsiveProvider now uses debounced window size updates to prevent rapid re-renders during resizing
  • The implementation is used consistently across 40+ components, indicating a well-tested responsive system
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other components that might be affected by the ResponsiveProvider changes

# Test 1: Find all files using useResponsive hook
echo "Files using useResponsive hook:"
rg -l "useResponsive.*ResponsiveProvider"

# Test 2: Check for any conditional imports or dynamic loading related to ResponsiveProvider
echo -e "\nFiles with dynamic imports near ResponsiveProvider usage:"
rg -B 3 -A 3 "React\.lazy.*ResponsiveProvider|import\(.*ResponsiveProvider\)"

Length of output: 3037


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ResponsiveProvider implementation and Titlebar usage
echo "ResponsiveProvider implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export function useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

echo -e "\nTitlebar responsive behavior implementation:"
rg -A 10 "isNarrowWidth" packages/desktop-client/src/components/Titlebar.tsx

echo -e "\nCheck for any recent changes to ResponsiveProvider:"
git log -p -- packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx | head -n 50

Length of output: 3483


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check useWindowSize implementation
echo "useWindowSize implementation:"
rg -A 15 "export function useWindowSize" packages/desktop-client/src/hooks/useWindowSize.ts

# Check if there are any other components that might affect window size calculations
echo -e "\nOther window size related code:"
rg -l "useWindowSize|window\.inner(Width|Height)"

Length of output: 457

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx (2)

34-34: LGTM: Import path update aligns with structural changes.

The updated import path for useResponsive reflects the reorganization of the ResponsiveProvider into the dedicated responsive feature folder. This change is consistent with the PR's structural improvements.

Let's verify that all imports of useResponsive have been updated consistently:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to verify the imports properly.

These commands should help us verify:

  1. All current import paths for ResponsiveProvider
  2. Usage of useResponsive hook across the codebase
  3. Files that contain ResponsiveProvider references

This will help ensure the import path change is consistent across the codebase.


Based on the search results, I can now provide the final response:

Import path update is consistent across the codebase

The search results confirm that all imports of useResponsive and ResponsiveProvider are consistently using the new path structure with responsive/ResponsiveProvider. The import in CategoryAutocomplete.tsx follows the same pattern as all other files in the codebase, and there are no remaining instances of old import paths.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old-style imports of ResponsiveProvider
# Expected: No matches for old import path

rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 166


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ResponsiveProvider imports across all files
rg "from.*ResponsiveProvider" 

# Also search for useResponsive usage to ensure consistency
rg "useResponsive"

# Find all TypeScript/React files that might use ResponsiveProvider
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$" | xargs grep -l "ResponsiveProvider"

Length of output: 18823


Line range hint 516-524: Verify responsive behavior during window resize.

The component correctly uses isNarrowWidth from useResponsive to apply mobile-specific styles. This is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout changes during window resize.

Please ensure testing covers:

  1. Initial layout detection on app load
  2. Layout changes when resizing the window
  3. Proper styling transitions between mobile and desktop views

Let's verify the responsive styling implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to verify the responsive behavior implementation.

This will help us identify files using responsive patterns and mobile-specific styling. Let's analyze the results to verify the implementation consistency.


Let's examine the specific implementation details of the responsive behavior.

This will help us verify if the responsive implementation is consistent with the application's responsive design patterns and if it's properly integrated with the ResponsiveProvider.


Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final verification of the responsive behavior implementation.

Responsive implementation is correctly integrated and consistent

The implementation shows proper responsive behavior integration:

  1. The useResponsive hook is correctly imported from ResponsiveProvider and used to detect narrow width layouts
  2. The responsive styling is consistently applied using the isNarrowWidth flag to conditionally render mobile-specific styles
  3. The mobile styles follow the application's design patterns:
    • Uses styles.mobileMenuItem for consistent mobile menu styling
    • Applies appropriate border and border-radius adjustments for mobile view
  4. The ResponsiveProvider implementation shows proper breakpoint handling and debounced window size tracking

The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resize as:

  • Window size changes are debounced (250ms) to prevent excessive re-renders
  • Breakpoints are properly defined and managed through the ResponsiveProvider
  • Mobile styles are consistently applied across autocomplete components
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent responsive styling patterns
# Expected: Similar responsive style implementations across components

# Look for other components using isNarrowWidth
rg "isNarrowWidth.*=.*useResponsive" --type tsx -B 2 -A 2

# Check for similar mobile menu styling patterns
rg "styles\.mobileMenuItem" --type tsx -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 166


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useResponsive hook usage
rg "useResponsive" -l

# Then look for specific responsive patterns
rg "isNarrowWidth" -l

# Search for mobile-specific styles
rg "mobileMenuItem|mobileStyling|mobile.*style" -l

Length of output: 6422


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the ResponsiveProvider implementation
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx

# Look at the actual implementation in CategoryAutocomplete
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/CategoryAutocomplete.tsx

# Check other autocomplete components for consistency
cat packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx

Length of output: 39990

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx (2)

34-34: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the architectural improvement of moving ResponsiveProvider to the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 466-471: Verify responsive layout changes work correctly on iPad.

The implementation correctly uses isNarrowWidth for conditional styling, which is crucial for the PR's objective of fixing layout issues on iPad. However, let's verify that the responsive behavior works as expected during window resize.

Also applies to: 473-478

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the responsive layout implementation to verify the iPad-specific behavior.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the useResponsive hook is implemented
  2. The specific breakpoints used for responsive layouts
  3. How PayeeAutocomplete component uses the responsive features

Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient evidence about the responsive implementation.

Responsive layout implementation is correctly handling iPad widths

The implementation is properly handling responsive layouts through:

  1. A well-structured useResponsive hook that's properly context-based
  2. Consistent breakpoint usage via design tokens (tokens.breakpoint_small)
  3. Appropriate conditional styling in PayeeAutocomplete based on isNarrowWidth:
    • Adjusts menu item styles for mobile/narrow views
    • Handles icon sizes responsively (14px vs 8px)
    • Applies proper border styling for narrow widths

The responsive behavior will work correctly during window resize on iPad as it:

  • Uses standard media queries based on min-width breakpoints
  • Relies on React context for responsive state management
  • Doesn't depend on device-specific event listeners
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other responsive layout dependencies that might affect the resize behavior

# Test 1: Look for any resize event listeners or window size dependencies
rg -l "window\.(inner|outer)" || rg -l "addEventListener.*resize"

# Test 2: Check for any media query usage that might affect the layout
rg -l "@media.*width"

# Test 3: Look for any iPad or iOS specific handling
rg -i "ipad|ios"

Length of output: 3381


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of useResponsive hook and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useResponsive() {
  $$$
}'

# Look for specific media queries related to iPad/tablet widths
rg -A 3 "@media.*width.*\{" packages/desktop-client/src/style/styles.ts

# Check PayeeAutocomplete's usage of responsive styling
rg -A 5 "isNarrowWidth|useResponsive" packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/PayeeAutocomplete.tsx

Length of output: 2079

packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx (2)

35-35: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path for useResponsive has been updated to reflect its new location in the dedicated responsive feature folder. This change aligns with the PR's structural improvements.

Let's verify that the ResponsiveProvider component exists at the new location and that all imports are consistently updated:

✅ Verification successful

Import path for ResponsiveProvider is correctly updated and consistent across the codebase

The verification confirms that:

  1. The ResponsiveProvider component exists at the expected new location: packages/desktop-client/src/components/responsive/ResponsiveProvider.tsx
  2. All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to import from the new location
  3. No outdated import paths were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResponsiveProvider exists at new location and check for any remaining old imports

# Test 1: Check if ResponsiveProvider exists at new location
fd "ResponsiveProvider.tsx" "packages/desktop-client/src"

# Test 2: Look for any remaining old imports that need updating
rg "from ['\"].*ResponsiveProvider['\"]" "packages/desktop-client/src"

Length of output: 5905


Line range hint 127-127: Verify: Responsive layout changes look good.

The useResponsive hook is correctly used to switch between mobile and desktop layouts. The isNarrowWidth flag appropriately determines:

  1. Whether to show MobilePageHeader or PageHeader
  2. The compact state of the FilterButton

This implementation should properly handle the iPad PWA layout issues when resizing.

Let's verify the responsive behavior implementation:

Also applies to: 208-224, 271-272

✅ Verification successful

The search results show extensive and consistent usage of isNarrowWidth from useResponsive hook across the codebase. Let me generate one more verification script to check for mobile-specific components:

This will help us verify the mobile component usage patterns in the Spending component and across the codebase.


Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:

Responsive layout implementation is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that:

  1. The useResponsive hook is consistently used across the codebase with the same pattern
  2. The Spending component correctly implements conditional rendering between MobilePageHeader and PageHeader based on isNarrowWidth
  3. The implementation aligns with the established responsive patterns used in other components throughout the application
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent responsive layout patterns across the codebase

# Test 1: Look for other components using isNarrowWidth to ensure consistent responsive patterns
rg "isNarrowWidth.*useResponsive" -A 3 "packages/desktop-client/src"

# Test 2: Check for any mobile-specific components to ensure they're used with responsive conditions
rg "Mobile.*" --type tsx "packages/desktop-client/src"

Length of output: 16270


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for mobile-specific components and their usage patterns
rg "Mobile.*" "packages/desktop-client/src" --type typescript --type typescriptreact -l

# Look specifically at the conditional rendering patterns in the Spending component
rg "MobilePageHeader|PageHeader" "packages/desktop-client/src/components/reports/reports/Spending.tsx" -A 2

Length of output: 884

packages/desktop-client/src/components/autocomplete/Autocomplete.tsx (3)

25-25: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.

The import path change aligns with the restructuring of ResponsiveProvider into the responsive feature folder.


Line range hint 258-269: LGTM: Responsive behavior implemented correctly.

The component properly handles responsive layout changes by:

  1. Using useResponsive hook to detect viewport width
  2. Applying mobile-specific styles when needed
  3. Maintaining proper style precedence through spread operator

Line range hint 258-269: Consider adding cleanup for window resize listeners.

While the useResponsive hook correctly handles layout changes, it's important to ensure proper cleanup of any window resize event listeners to prevent memory leaks, especially in components that may be mounted/unmounted frequently.

Let's verify if the useResponsive hook properly handles cleanup:

Copy link
Contributor

@matt-fidd matt-fidd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is brilliant! Code looks fine to me (pending Matiss approving the cache change you highlighted) and it works functionally. This'll make rotating for a desktop feature much nicer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Resizing iPad PWA doesn’t change the budget layout between mobile and desktop
2 participants