From 14209b114ebb0d144f772d3838e80b95e2ded373 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Amy J. Ko"
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:36:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Coadvising advice.
---
src/routes/(app)/faq/+page.svelte | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/routes/(app)/faq/+page.svelte b/src/routes/(app)/faq/+page.svelte
index 7d1ec0c8..afdef08a 100644
--- a/src/routes/(app)/faq/+page.svelte
+++ b/src/routes/(app)/faq/+page.svelte
@@ -162,6 +162,65 @@
+
+ I advise a lot of doctoral students, but also advise a lot of faculty
+ who advise doctoral students, and one of the most common areas of
+ concern that comes up is how to do co-advising well. I wouldn't say I'm
+ an expert on this, but I do feel like I know the challenges that arise.
+ Here are the questions I think are key for everyone in a co-advising
+ situation — co-advisors and co-advisees — to have shared
+ agreement on:
+
+
+ - How does each advisor see their role in the student's work and
+ success? Are they compatible? In conflict? Some advisors might see students
+ as people who can accelerate their research focus; others might view
+ them as students who they are mentoring. Others still might view students
+ as collaborators. All three of these perspectives come with different
+ expectations and relationships, and so it's important for co-advisors
+ to come to some shared understanding about them.
+ - Who is responsible for the long term funding with the student?
+ Is that fixed or dynamic? This is key, because it shapes who feels responsible for resourcing
+ a PhD students' time, and offering the student certainty about their
+ funding stability.
+ - Should both advisors always be a collaborator on a students'
+ work. Or does that depend on the paper and project?. Authorship
+ expectations are wildly different between researchers, so these
+ should be stated and negotiated upfront.
+ - When advisors' disagree on how a student should proceed, is it
+ the student's job to reconcile the disagreement?. Are they free to choose without consequence from either advisor?
+ Or is it the advisors' job to come to consensus? Is that done with
+ or without the students' involvement? Everyone should agree on how
+ this happens.
+ - When there is interpersonal conflict between advisors, how is a
+ student shielded from that? Or is a student expected to be the mediator? (Not recommended).
+
+
+ What other questions do you think are important to answer?
+
+
When writing and reviewing scientific papers, there are a lot of