You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have ops that are polymorphic. The first one that comes to mind is If, but there may be others. For these cases, we should specialize the op for each type it could take, for example IfBV, IfFP, etc. This would allow us to more easily have fully typed ASTs in the future. It might be preferable to have a breaking API change to accommodate this, as that would reduce the amount of runtime type checking required, although this isn't strictly necessary, just a performance micro-optimization.
Known others: fpToFP
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
We have ops that are polymorphic. The first one that comes to mind is
If, but there may be others. For these cases, we should specialize the op for each type it could take, for exampleIfBV,IfFP, etc. This would allow us to more easily have fully typed ASTs in the future. It might be preferable to have a breaking API change to accommodate this, as that would reduce the amount of runtime type checking required, although this isn't strictly necessary, just a performance micro-optimization.Known others: fpToFP
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: