Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Documentation] [zos_archive] Example is focused on GDG and terse yet really does not align to a terse example. #1731

Open
1 task done
ddimatos opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Documentation Report documetation errors or needed changes Needs Triage Issue need assessment by a team member(s)

Comments

@ddimatos
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • There are no existing issues.

Documentation issue description

Compare this terse example to others, it does not seem to really have meant to be a terse example.

- name: Archive multiple data sets into a new GDS
  zos_archive:
    src: "USER.ARCHIVE.*"
    dest: "USER.GDG(+1)"
    format:
      name: terse
      format_options:
        use_adrdssu: True

Others that align to terse.

- name: Archive multiple GDSs into a terse
  zos_archive:
    src:
      - "USER.GDG(0)"
      - "USER.GDG(-1)"
      - "USER.GDG(-2)"
    dest: "USER.ARCHIVE.RESULT.TRS"
    format:
      name: terse
      format_options:
        use_adrdssu: True

IBM z/OS Ansible core Version

v1.9.0 (default)

Ansible module

No response

@ddimatos ddimatos added the Documentation Report documetation errors or needed changes label Sep 27, 2024
@ddimatos ddimatos added the Needs Triage Issue need assessment by a team member(s) label Sep 27, 2024
@fernandofloresg
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't see why this does not align with terse samples ? Tested this and it does work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Report documetation errors or needed changes Needs Triage Issue need assessment by a team member(s)
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants