[yaml] Enhance YAML API docs

[Polber]

The current YAML API refernce docs look like the following:

This PR adds formatting to make the docs look more like the Sphinx-themed PyDocs used by the Python SDK:

This change not only adds some color and easier-to-read formatting , but also separates the transforms into individual pages to reduce clutter. This should hopefully make the user-experience a bit better.

UPDATE: the doc will remain as one page, but will include the new side panel and formatting changes.

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

[Polber]

R: @robertwb

[github-actions]

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.44%. Comparing base (67dc973) to head (a8987bd).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
sdks/python/apache_beam/yaml/generate_yaml_docs.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #32825      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     60.39%   60.44%   +0.04%     
  Complexity    15099    15099              
============================================
  Files          2735     2736       +1     
  Lines        265201   265331     +130     
  Branches      12106    12106              
============================================
+ Hits         160171   160378     +207     
+ Misses        98610    98533      -77     
  Partials       6420     6420              

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	81.59% <0.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[liferoad]

Can you check https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/11579341692/job/32235315129?pr=32825?

[robertwb]

We should try to get to the bottom of this... File a bug?

[damccorm]

Agreed, this isn't super sustainable. I think we can just use #32832

[robertwb]

This looks lots nicer.

[damccorm]

LGTM, thanks!

[damccorm]

Test failures are pretty clearly unrelated, so I'm going to merge