Suppress errors in JvmInitializer#beforeProcessing if successfully initialized before

[Abacn]

A band-aid fix aimed at mitigate #32990 while do not change the current behavior (JvmInitializer invoked multiple times in embedded environment)

Please add a meaningful description for your change here

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

[Abacn]

PostCommit Java PVR Spark Batch passed

[github-actions]

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

[Abacn]

assign set of reviewers

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @damondouglas for label java.
R: @damccorm for label build.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[damccorm]

Thanks, I think this is a positive change