Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Study changes to t/op/*.t (5 of 12) #215

Closed
jkeenan opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Study changes to t/op/*.t (5 of 12) #215

jkeenan opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
study Study changes made by developers since 5.32.0

Comments

@jkeenan
Copy link
Collaborator

jkeenan commented Aug 17, 2020

In this ticket we will study our progress in pursuit of Objective 2, "strict-by-default", for the following files in the Perl core distribution:

t/op/fh.t
t/op/filetest.t
t/op/flip.t
t/op/for.t
t/op/fork.t
t/op/glob.t
t/op/grent.t
t/op/grep.t
t/op/gv.t
t/op/hashassign.t

These files should be evaluated in light of the guidelines presented on this wiki page. Please post the summary of your findings in a single comment in this issue.

First-time contributors: (1) Please post a comment to this ticket indicating you are working on it. That will enable us to assign the ticket to you. (GitHub won't let us do that until it already thinks you're part of the project.) (2) You should subscribe to this repository so that you get email updates.

Thank you for helping to improve the Perl programming language.

@jkeenan jkeenan added the study Study changes made by developers since 5.32.0 label Aug 17, 2020
@oodler577
Copy link
Contributor

@jkeenan interested in taking this

@oodler577
Copy link
Contributor

t/op/fh.t

  • looks ok
  • adds no strict 'refs'

t/op/filetest.t

  • looks ok
  • added "no strict 'refs'"*

t/op/flip.t

  • looks good

t/op/for.t

  • looks good

t/op/fork.t

  • looks good

t/op/glob.t

  • looks ok
  • added "no warnings 'uninitialized';"

t/op/grent.t

  • looks good*

t/op/grep.t

  • looks good

t/op/gv.t

  • looks ok
  • included comment explaining turning off of strict in some cases,
    so I won't include this here

t/op/hashassign.t

  • looks good

@oodler577
Copy link
Contributor

back to you @jkeenan

@jkeenan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jkeenan commented Oct 10, 2020

Looks like these files are in good shape. Thanks for your review. Closing ticket.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
study Study changes made by developers since 5.32.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants