Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reassigning stewardship #134

Open
orthecreedence opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Reassigning stewardship #134

orthecreedence opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
layer:core Regarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc) project:paper tag:governance Having to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc) tag:property Having to do with use/stewardship with property or resources type:discussion Discussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)
Milestone

Comments

@orthecreedence
Copy link
Member

Picking up from where #86 left off, while having some very loose concept of resource management makes sense (ie, get the hell out of the way and let people figure it out), there needs to be some form of failsafe such that stewardship of a resource can be re-assigned if necessary.

The idea is a bloc might be in stewardship of a resource (an apartment building maybe) and there's some mass-exodus, leaving a few asshole stewards left int he entire bloc who refuse to let anyone live in the building. They cannot be reasoned with. What is the solution?

There needs to be some framework for reassigning stewardship from one bloc to another. The general idea here is that the people most affected by a decision are the ones who make it. This is impossible to quantify in any meaningful sense, so we have to rely on one or more workarounds.

Ideas:

  • Geography. If we can somehow determine where people spend their time (at home, at work, hanging out under bridges) then we can assign some sphere of location-based influence that allows them some say.
  • Quadratic voting. Everyone gets some small, time-based vote budget that caps out at some number. They can use this voting power to reassign stewardship.

If you have more thoughts on this, be sure to leave it in the comments below, and don't forget to smash that subscribe button!!1

@orthecreedence orthecreedence added project:paper tag:governance Having to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc) tag:property Having to do with use/stewardship with property or resources type:discussion Discussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy) labels Oct 8, 2021
@orthecreedence orthecreedence added this to the v0.3 - core milestone Oct 8, 2021
@orthecreedence orthecreedence changed the title Reassining stewardship Reassigning stewardship Oct 8, 2021
@orthecreedence orthecreedence added the layer:core Regarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc) label Apr 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
layer:core Regarding the core protocol (cost tracking, transactional fabric, etc) project:paper tag:governance Having to do with governance in general (global,companies, resources, etc) tag:property Having to do with use/stewardship with property or resources type:discussion Discussion or ideas for future direction, input welcome (don't be shy)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant