-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
exp3_analysis_ratings.Rmd
202 lines (165 loc) · 5.3 KB
/
exp3_analysis_ratings.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
---
title: 'Experiment 3: Ratings Analysis'
date: "`r Sys.Date()`"
output:
github_document:
toc: true
toc_depth: 3
pdf_document:
toc: true
toc_depth: 3
editor_options:
markdown:
wrap: 72
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
library(tidyverse)
options(dplyr.summarise.inform = FALSE)
library(magrittr)
library(lme4)
library(lmerTest)
library(buildmer)
```
# Setup
Variable names:
- Experiment: exp3\_
- Data (\_d\_)
- d = main df
- Models (\_m\_)
- like = Likeability ratings
- acc = Accomplishment ratings
- imp = Importance ratings
- ratings = build model with all 3 ratings
Load data and select columns used in model. See data/exp3_data_about.txt
for more details.
```{r load-data}
exp3_d <- read.csv("../data/exp3_data.csv", stringsAsFactors = TRUE) %>%
rename("Participant" = "SubjID", "Item" = "Name") %>%
select(
Participant, Condition, GenderRating, Item,
He, She, Other,
Likeable, Accomplished, Important
)
str(exp3_d)
```
Center gender rating for names: Original scale from 1 to 7, with 1 as
most masculine and 7 as most feminine. Mean-centered with higher still
as more feminine.
```{r center-gender-rating}
exp3_d %<>% mutate(GenderRatingCentered = scale(GenderRating, scale = FALSE))
```
Set contrasts for name conditions, now weighted to account for uneven
sample sizes. This uses Scott Fraundorf's function for weighted
contrasts. (The psycholing package version doesn't support doing 2v1
comparisons, only 1v1.) Condition1 is Last vs First+Full. Condition2 is
First vs Full.
```{r contrast-coding}
source("centerfactor.R")
contrasts(exp3_d$Condition) <- centerfactor(
exp3_d$Condition, c("last", "first")
)
contrasts(exp3_d$Condition)
```
Flip ratings from 1=most likeable/accomplished/important to 7=most
L/A/I, to make interpreting models easier, then mean-center.
```{r flip-ratings}
exp3_d %<>% mutate(
LikeableFlip = recode(Likeable,
"1" = 7, "2" = 6, "3" = 5, "4" = 4, "5" = 3, "6" = 2, "7" = 1
),
AccomplishedFlip = recode(Accomplished,
"1" = 7, "2" = 6, "3" = 5, "4" = 4, "5" = 3, "6" = 2, "7" = 1
),
ImportantFlip = recode(Important,
"1" = 7, "2" = 6, "3" = 5, "4" = 4, "5" = 3, "6" = 2, "7" = 1
),
LikeableCentered = scale(LikeableFlip, scale = FALSE),
AccomplishedCentered = scale(AccomplishedFlip, scale = FALSE),
ImportantCentered = scale(ImportantFlip, scale = FALSE)
)
str(exp3_d)
```
# Likeability
Summary statistics:
```{r means-likeable}
summary(exp3_d$Likeable)
summary(exp3_d$LikeableFlip)
sd(exp3_d$Likeable)
```
Does the Likeability rating of the character predict the likelihood of
*she* as opposed to *he* and *other* responses? The maximal model
includes all interactions, then random intercepts by item but not by
participant.
```{r model-likeable, cache=TRUE}
exp3_m_like <- buildmer(
formula = She ~ Condition * GenderRatingCentered *
LikeableCentered + (1 | Participant) + (1 | Item),
data = exp3_d, family = binomial,
buildmerControl(direction = "order", quiet = TRUE)
)
summary(exp3_m_like)
```
- Characters who are rated as more Likeable are more likely to be
referred to with *she*
# Accomplishment
Summary statistics:
```{r means-accomplishment}
summary(exp3_d$Accomplished)
summary(exp3_d$AccomplishedFlip)
sd(exp3_d$Accomplished)
```
Does the Accomplishment rating of the character predict the likelihood
of *she* as opposed to *he* and *other* responses? The maximal model
includes all interactions, then random intercepts by item but not by
participant.
```{r model-accomplishment, cache=TRUE}
exp3_m_acc <- buildmer(
formula = She ~ Condition * GenderRatingCentered *
AccomplishedCentered + (1 | Participant) + (1 | Item),
data = exp3_d, family = binomial,
buildmerControl(direction = "order", quiet = TRUE)
)
summary(exp3_m_acc)
```
- Characters who are rated as more Accomplished are more likely to be
referred to with *she*, but this is n.s. after correction for
multiple comparisons.
- Interaction between Accomplishment, Name Gender Rating, and
Condition (L vs F+F), but this is n.s. after correction for multiple
comparisons, so I'm not going to dig into it.
# Importance
Summary statistics:
```{r means-importance}
summary(exp3_d$Important)
summary(exp3_d$ImportantFlip)
sd(exp3_d$Important)
```
Does the Importance rating of the character predict the likelihood of
*she* as opposed to *he* and *other* responses The maximal model
includes all interactions, then random intercepts by item but not by
participant.
```{r model-importance, cache=TRUE}
exp3_m_imp <- buildmer(
formula = She ~ Condition * GenderRatingCentered *
ImportantCentered + (1 | Participant) + (1 | Item),
data = exp3_d, family = binomial,
buildmerControl(direction = "order", quiet = TRUE)
)
summary(exp3_m_imp)
```
- Interaction between Important, Name Gender Rating, and Condition (L
vs F+F), but this is way too small to be significant after
correction for multiple comparisons
# All Ratings
```{r model-ratings-all, cache=TRUE}
exp3_m_ratings <- buildmer(
formula = She ~ Condition * GenderRatingCentered * LikeableCentered *
AccomplishedCentered * ImportantCentered +
(1 | Participant) + (1 | Item),
data = exp3_d,
family = binomial,
buildmerControl(direction = c("order", "backward"), quiet = TRUE)
)
summary(exp3_m_ratings)
```