Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should all login_hint formats be supported by an implementation? #227

Open
trehman-gsma opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@trehman-gsma
Copy link
Collaborator

trehman-gsma commented Nov 12, 2024

Problem description
Seeking clarification on the extent of format support that is required within a flow that uses the login_hint parameter.

The Security and Interoperability Profile currently has 3 login_hint formats:

  • Is it mandatory for an API implementation to support all login_hint formats? For example, a SimSwap implementation may not find value in supporting ipport.

  • If not mandatory, what is the expected response when an unsupported login_hint is passed in?

Expected action
Clarification in documentation.

@trehman-gsma trehman-gsma added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant