Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs(content/update): migration guide Process Instance Modification #1689

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

docs(content/update): migration guide Process Instance Modification #1689

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

venetrius
Copy link
Member

@venetrius venetrius self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@venetrius venetrius mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Closed
psavidis
psavidis requested changes Oct 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@psavidis psavidis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job to describe a very technical concept which is very specific.
In this regard, the description of the changes is indeed harder.

I've listed below some recommendations for changing the phrasing which was a bit confusing to me.

@venetrius
Copy link
Member Author

I've listed below some recommendations for changing the phrasing which was a bit confusing to me.
Thanks!
They all are great improvement, committed them.

@psavidis psavidis force-pushed the 4632-start-date-modify-operation branch from 74a2020 to 801adcb Compare October 4, 2024 12:11
@venetrius venetrius merged commit 0f236e5 into master Oct 4, 2024
1 check passed
@venetrius venetrius deleted the 4632-start-date-modify-operation branch October 4, 2024 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@psavidis psavidis psavidis approved these changes

Assignees

@venetrius venetrius

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@venetrius @psavidis