You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using the read() method, and I don't provide headers and don't specify that the first row is headers, the library returns a query with columns named column1, etc That is convenient syntax to work with and makes the code more readable. When using readLargeFile and returning a struct, it would be great if you could do the same thing with the columns array.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The read() method does that because a query must have column names. readCsv() returns an array of arrays which doesn't require them. If you don't specify them then I think it's right that columns should be empty. If you want to add them you can using the withHeader() method:
When using the
read()
method, and I don't provide headers and don't specify that the first row is headers, the library returns a query with columns namedcolumn1, etc
That is convenient syntax to work with and makes the code more readable. When usingreadLargeFile
and returning a struct, it would be great if you could do the same thing with thecolumns
array.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: